Cargando…

An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure

PURPOSE: ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 have been developed for use as outcome measures with individuals aged 16 and over, experiencing mental health difficulties. This paper reports modelling results from the item response theory (IRT) analyses that were used for item reduction. METHODS: From several stages...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keetharuth, Anju Devianee, Bjorner, Jakob Bue, Barkham, Michael, Browne, John, Croudace, Tim, Brazier, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2
_version_ 1783645011756187648
author Keetharuth, Anju Devianee
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
Barkham, Michael
Browne, John
Croudace, Tim
Brazier, John
author_facet Keetharuth, Anju Devianee
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
Barkham, Michael
Browne, John
Croudace, Tim
Brazier, John
author_sort Keetharuth, Anju Devianee
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 have been developed for use as outcome measures with individuals aged 16 and over, experiencing mental health difficulties. This paper reports modelling results from the item response theory (IRT) analyses that were used for item reduction. METHODS: From several stages of preparatory work including focus groups and a previous psychometric survey, a pool of items was developed. After confirming that the ReQoL item pool was sufficiently unidimensional for scoring, IRT model parameters were estimated using Samejima’s Graded Response Model (GRM). All 39 mental health items were evaluated with respect to item fit and differential item function regarding age, gender, ethnicity, and diagnosis. Scales were evaluated regarding overall measurement precision and known-groups validity (by care setting type and self-rating of overall mental health). RESULTS: The study recruited 4266 participants with a wide range of mental health diagnoses from multiple settings. The IRT parameters demonstrated excellent coverage of the latent construct with the centres of item information functions ranging from − 0.98 to 0.21 and with discrimination slope parameters from 1.4 to 3.6. We identified only two poorly fitting items and no evidence of differential item functioning of concern. Scales showed excellent measurement precision and known-groups validity. CONCLUSION: The results from the IRT analyses confirm the robust structure properties and internal construct validity of the ReQoL instruments. The strong psychometric evidence generated guided item selection for the final versions of the ReQoL measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7847872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78478722021-02-08 An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure Keetharuth, Anju Devianee Bjorner, Jakob Bue Barkham, Michael Browne, John Croudace, Tim Brazier, John Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20 have been developed for use as outcome measures with individuals aged 16 and over, experiencing mental health difficulties. This paper reports modelling results from the item response theory (IRT) analyses that were used for item reduction. METHODS: From several stages of preparatory work including focus groups and a previous psychometric survey, a pool of items was developed. After confirming that the ReQoL item pool was sufficiently unidimensional for scoring, IRT model parameters were estimated using Samejima’s Graded Response Model (GRM). All 39 mental health items were evaluated with respect to item fit and differential item function regarding age, gender, ethnicity, and diagnosis. Scales were evaluated regarding overall measurement precision and known-groups validity (by care setting type and self-rating of overall mental health). RESULTS: The study recruited 4266 participants with a wide range of mental health diagnoses from multiple settings. The IRT parameters demonstrated excellent coverage of the latent construct with the centres of item information functions ranging from − 0.98 to 0.21 and with discrimination slope parameters from 1.4 to 3.6. We identified only two poorly fitting items and no evidence of differential item functioning of concern. Scales showed excellent measurement precision and known-groups validity. CONCLUSION: The results from the IRT analyses confirm the robust structure properties and internal construct validity of the ReQoL instruments. The strong psychometric evidence generated guided item selection for the final versions of the ReQoL measures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-09-09 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7847872/ /pubmed/32909162 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Keetharuth, Anju Devianee
Bjorner, Jakob Bue
Barkham, Michael
Browne, John
Croudace, Tim
Brazier, John
An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title_full An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title_fullStr An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title_full_unstemmed An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title_short An item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measure
title_sort item response theory analysis of an item pool for the recovering quality of life (reqol) measure
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32909162
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02622-2
work_keys_str_mv AT keetharuthanjudevianee anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT bjornerjakobbue anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT barkhammichael anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT brownejohn anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT croudacetim anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT brazierjohn anitemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT keetharuthanjudevianee itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT bjornerjakobbue itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT barkhammichael itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT brownejohn itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT croudacetim itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure
AT brazierjohn itemresponsetheoryanalysisofanitempoolfortherecoveringqualityoflifereqolmeasure