Cargando…
A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the us...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240 |
_version_ | 1783645028280696832 |
---|---|
author | Efkemann, Simone A. Scholten, Matthé Bottlender, Ronald Juckel, Georg Gather, Jakov |
author_facet | Efkemann, Simone A. Scholten, Matthé Bottlender, Ronald Juckel, Georg Gather, Jakov |
author_sort | Efkemann, Simone A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the use of coercion. Aim: The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Methods: The original English version of the SACS published was translated into German. Subsequently, it was empirically validated on a sample of N = 209 mental health professionals by conducting an exploratory factor analysis. Results: The three-factor structure in the original version of the SACS, consisting of critical, pragmatic and positive attitudes toward the use of coercion, could not be replicated. Instead, the German version revealed one factor ranging from rejecting to approving the use of coercion. Conclusion: The SACS is one of the first instruments created to assess staff attitudes toward coercion in a validated way. The version of the instrument developed in this study allows for a validated assessment of those attitudes in German. Our results highlight the ethical importance of using validated measurements in studies on the role of staff factors in the reduction of coercion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7847975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78479752021-02-02 A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation Efkemann, Simone A. Scholten, Matthé Bottlender, Ronald Juckel, Georg Gather, Jakov Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the use of coercion. Aim: The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Methods: The original English version of the SACS published was translated into German. Subsequently, it was empirically validated on a sample of N = 209 mental health professionals by conducting an exploratory factor analysis. Results: The three-factor structure in the original version of the SACS, consisting of critical, pragmatic and positive attitudes toward the use of coercion, could not be replicated. Instead, the German version revealed one factor ranging from rejecting to approving the use of coercion. Conclusion: The SACS is one of the first instruments created to assess staff attitudes toward coercion in a validated way. The version of the instrument developed in this study allows for a validated assessment of those attitudes in German. Our results highlight the ethical importance of using validated measurements in studies on the role of staff factors in the reduction of coercion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7847975/ /pubmed/33536947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240 Text en Copyright © 2021 Efkemann, Scholten, Bottlender, Juckel and Gather. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Efkemann, Simone A. Scholten, Matthé Bottlender, Ronald Juckel, Georg Gather, Jakov A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title | A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title_full | A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title_fullStr | A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title_full_unstemmed | A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title_short | A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation |
title_sort | german version of the staff attitude to coercion scale. development and empirical validation |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT efkemannsimonea agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT scholtenmatthe agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT bottlenderronald agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT juckelgeorg agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT gatherjakov agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT efkemannsimonea germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT scholtenmatthe germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT bottlenderronald germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT juckelgeorg germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation AT gatherjakov germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation |