Cargando…

A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation

Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Efkemann, Simone A., Scholten, Matthé, Bottlender, Ronald, Juckel, Georg, Gather, Jakov
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240
_version_ 1783645028280696832
author Efkemann, Simone A.
Scholten, Matthé
Bottlender, Ronald
Juckel, Georg
Gather, Jakov
author_facet Efkemann, Simone A.
Scholten, Matthé
Bottlender, Ronald
Juckel, Georg
Gather, Jakov
author_sort Efkemann, Simone A.
collection PubMed
description Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the use of coercion. Aim: The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Methods: The original English version of the SACS published was translated into German. Subsequently, it was empirically validated on a sample of N = 209 mental health professionals by conducting an exploratory factor analysis. Results: The three-factor structure in the original version of the SACS, consisting of critical, pragmatic and positive attitudes toward the use of coercion, could not be replicated. Instead, the German version revealed one factor ranging from rejecting to approving the use of coercion. Conclusion: The SACS is one of the first instruments created to assess staff attitudes toward coercion in a validated way. The version of the instrument developed in this study allows for a validated assessment of those attitudes in German. Our results highlight the ethical importance of using validated measurements in studies on the role of staff factors in the reduction of coercion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7847975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78479752021-02-02 A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation Efkemann, Simone A. Scholten, Matthé Bottlender, Ronald Juckel, Georg Gather, Jakov Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Background: Individual staff factors, such as personality traits and attitudes, are increasingly seen as an important factor in the reduction of coercion in mental health services. At the same time, only a few validated instruments exist to measure those factors and examine their influence on the use of coercion. Aim: The present study aimed to develop and validate a German version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS). Methods: The original English version of the SACS published was translated into German. Subsequently, it was empirically validated on a sample of N = 209 mental health professionals by conducting an exploratory factor analysis. Results: The three-factor structure in the original version of the SACS, consisting of critical, pragmatic and positive attitudes toward the use of coercion, could not be replicated. Instead, the German version revealed one factor ranging from rejecting to approving the use of coercion. Conclusion: The SACS is one of the first instruments created to assess staff attitudes toward coercion in a validated way. The version of the instrument developed in this study allows for a validated assessment of those attitudes in German. Our results highlight the ethical importance of using validated measurements in studies on the role of staff factors in the reduction of coercion. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7847975/ /pubmed/33536947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240 Text en Copyright © 2021 Efkemann, Scholten, Bottlender, Juckel and Gather. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Efkemann, Simone A.
Scholten, Matthé
Bottlender, Ronald
Juckel, Georg
Gather, Jakov
A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title_full A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title_fullStr A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title_full_unstemmed A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title_short A German Version of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale. Development and Empirical Validation
title_sort german version of the staff attitude to coercion scale. development and empirical validation
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7847975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.573240
work_keys_str_mv AT efkemannsimonea agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT scholtenmatthe agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT bottlenderronald agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT juckelgeorg agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT gatherjakov agermanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT efkemannsimonea germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT scholtenmatthe germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT bottlenderronald germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT juckelgeorg germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation
AT gatherjakov germanversionofthestaffattitudetocoercionscaledevelopmentandempiricalvalidation