Cargando…

Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)

The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pardede, Saga, Gausel, Nicolay, Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090
_version_ 1783645051375583232
author Pardede, Saga
Gausel, Nicolay
Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn
author_facet Pardede, Saga
Gausel, Nicolay
Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn
author_sort Pardede, Saga
collection PubMed
description The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and three different theoretical models of acceptance (with a total of 20 items). In a first step, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) failed to provide support for these eight theoretical models. In a second step, we therefore applied Exploratory Factor Analysis yielding three factors, which we interpreted as communicating: (1) Belongingness, (2) Emotion-Acceptance, and (3) Social Self-Representation. In a third step, these three factors were corroborated by a CFA. We discuss how these two factors of “belongingness,” “emotion-acceptance” respond to the literature on the need to belong and be accepted, and we reflect on how ‘social self-representation’ seems to be an alternative motivation for how we present ourselves to our social relations to fulfill our needs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7848075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78480752021-02-02 Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) Pardede, Saga Gausel, Nicolay Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn Front Psychol Psychology The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and three different theoretical models of acceptance (with a total of 20 items). In a first step, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) failed to provide support for these eight theoretical models. In a second step, we therefore applied Exploratory Factor Analysis yielding three factors, which we interpreted as communicating: (1) Belongingness, (2) Emotion-Acceptance, and (3) Social Self-Representation. In a third step, these three factors were corroborated by a CFA. We discuss how these two factors of “belongingness,” “emotion-acceptance” respond to the literature on the need to belong and be accepted, and we reflect on how ‘social self-representation’ seems to be an alternative motivation for how we present ourselves to our social relations to fulfill our needs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7848075/ /pubmed/33536975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pardede, Gausel and Høie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Pardede, Saga
Gausel, Nicolay
Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn
Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title_full Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title_fullStr Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title_short Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
title_sort revisiting the “the breakfast club”: testing different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance (and social self-representation)
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536975
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090
work_keys_str_mv AT pardedesaga revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation
AT gauselnicolay revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation
AT høiemagnhildmjavatn revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation