Cargando…
Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation)
The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and thr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090 |
_version_ | 1783645051375583232 |
---|---|
author | Pardede, Saga Gausel, Nicolay Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn |
author_facet | Pardede, Saga Gausel, Nicolay Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn |
author_sort | Pardede, Saga |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and three different theoretical models of acceptance (with a total of 20 items). In a first step, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) failed to provide support for these eight theoretical models. In a second step, we therefore applied Exploratory Factor Analysis yielding three factors, which we interpreted as communicating: (1) Belongingness, (2) Emotion-Acceptance, and (3) Social Self-Representation. In a third step, these three factors were corroborated by a CFA. We discuss how these two factors of “belongingness,” “emotion-acceptance” respond to the literature on the need to belong and be accepted, and we reflect on how ‘social self-representation’ seems to be an alternative motivation for how we present ourselves to our social relations to fulfill our needs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7848075 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78480752021-02-02 Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) Pardede, Saga Gausel, Nicolay Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn Front Psychol Psychology The current work tests different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance as fundamental needs for human motivation. In the current study, 372 participants were presented with 52 different items measuring five different theoretical models of belongingness (with a total of 32 items) and three different theoretical models of acceptance (with a total of 20 items). In a first step, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) failed to provide support for these eight theoretical models. In a second step, we therefore applied Exploratory Factor Analysis yielding three factors, which we interpreted as communicating: (1) Belongingness, (2) Emotion-Acceptance, and (3) Social Self-Representation. In a third step, these three factors were corroborated by a CFA. We discuss how these two factors of “belongingness,” “emotion-acceptance” respond to the literature on the need to belong and be accepted, and we reflect on how ‘social self-representation’ seems to be an alternative motivation for how we present ourselves to our social relations to fulfill our needs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7848075/ /pubmed/33536975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090 Text en Copyright © 2021 Pardede, Gausel and Høie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Pardede, Saga Gausel, Nicolay Høie, Magnhild Mjåvatn Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title | Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title_full | Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title_fullStr | Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title_full_unstemmed | Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title_short | Revisiting the “The Breakfast Club”: Testing Different Theoretical Models of Belongingness and Acceptance (and Social Self-Representation) |
title_sort | revisiting the “the breakfast club”: testing different theoretical models of belongingness and acceptance (and social self-representation) |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848075/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604090 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pardedesaga revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation AT gauselnicolay revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation AT høiemagnhildmjavatn revisitingthethebreakfastclubtestingdifferenttheoreticalmodelsofbelongingnessandacceptanceandsocialselfrepresentation |