Cargando…
Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging
Development of veterinary subunit vaccines comes with a spectrum of challenges, such as the choice of adjuvant, antigen delivery vehicle, and optimization of dosing strategy. Over the years, our laboratory has largely focused on investigating silica vesicles (SVs) for developing effective veterinary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.606652 |
_version_ | 1783645062082592768 |
---|---|
author | Mody, Karishma T. Zhang, Bing Li, Xun Fletcher, Nicholas L. Akhter, Dewan T. Jarrett, Sandy Zhang, Jun Yu, Chengzhong Thurecht, Kristofer J. Mahony, Timothy J. Mitter, Neena |
author_facet | Mody, Karishma T. Zhang, Bing Li, Xun Fletcher, Nicholas L. Akhter, Dewan T. Jarrett, Sandy Zhang, Jun Yu, Chengzhong Thurecht, Kristofer J. Mahony, Timothy J. Mitter, Neena |
author_sort | Mody, Karishma T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Development of veterinary subunit vaccines comes with a spectrum of challenges, such as the choice of adjuvant, antigen delivery vehicle, and optimization of dosing strategy. Over the years, our laboratory has largely focused on investigating silica vesicles (SVs) for developing effective veterinary vaccines for multiple targets. Rhipicephalus microplus (cattle tick) are known to have a high impact on cattle health and the livestock industry in the tropical and subtropical regions. Development of vaccine using Bm86 antigen against R. microplus has emerged as an attractive alternative to control ticks. In this study, we have investigated the biodistribution of SV in a live animal model, as well as further explored the SV ability for vaccine development. Rhodamine-labeled SV-140-C(18) (Rho-SV-140-C(18)) vesicles were used to adsorb the Cy5-labeled R. microplus Bm86 antigen (Cy5-Bm86) to enable detection and characterization of the biodistribution of SV as well as antigen in vivo in a small animal model for up to 28 days using optical fluorescence imaging. We tracked the in vivo biodistribution of SVs and Bm86 antigen at different timepoints (days 3, 8, 13, and 28) in BALB/c mice. The biodistribution analysis by live imaging as well as by measuring the fluorescent intensity of harvested organs over the duration of the experiment (28 days) showed greater accumulation of SVs at the site of injection. The Bm86 antigen biodistribution was traced in lymph nodes, kidney, and liver, contributing to our understanding how this delivery platform successfully elicits antibody responses in the groups administered antigen in combination with SV. Selected tissues (skin, lymph nodes, spleen, kidney, liver, and lungs) were examined for any cellular abnormalities by histological analysis. No adverse effect or any other abnormalities were observed in the tissues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7848120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78481202021-02-02 Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging Mody, Karishma T. Zhang, Bing Li, Xun Fletcher, Nicholas L. Akhter, Dewan T. Jarrett, Sandy Zhang, Jun Yu, Chengzhong Thurecht, Kristofer J. Mahony, Timothy J. Mitter, Neena Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Development of veterinary subunit vaccines comes with a spectrum of challenges, such as the choice of adjuvant, antigen delivery vehicle, and optimization of dosing strategy. Over the years, our laboratory has largely focused on investigating silica vesicles (SVs) for developing effective veterinary vaccines for multiple targets. Rhipicephalus microplus (cattle tick) are known to have a high impact on cattle health and the livestock industry in the tropical and subtropical regions. Development of vaccine using Bm86 antigen against R. microplus has emerged as an attractive alternative to control ticks. In this study, we have investigated the biodistribution of SV in a live animal model, as well as further explored the SV ability for vaccine development. Rhodamine-labeled SV-140-C(18) (Rho-SV-140-C(18)) vesicles were used to adsorb the Cy5-labeled R. microplus Bm86 antigen (Cy5-Bm86) to enable detection and characterization of the biodistribution of SV as well as antigen in vivo in a small animal model for up to 28 days using optical fluorescence imaging. We tracked the in vivo biodistribution of SVs and Bm86 antigen at different timepoints (days 3, 8, 13, and 28) in BALB/c mice. The biodistribution analysis by live imaging as well as by measuring the fluorescent intensity of harvested organs over the duration of the experiment (28 days) showed greater accumulation of SVs at the site of injection. The Bm86 antigen biodistribution was traced in lymph nodes, kidney, and liver, contributing to our understanding how this delivery platform successfully elicits antibody responses in the groups administered antigen in combination with SV. Selected tissues (skin, lymph nodes, spleen, kidney, liver, and lungs) were examined for any cellular abnormalities by histological analysis. No adverse effect or any other abnormalities were observed in the tissues. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7848120/ /pubmed/33537291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.606652 Text en Copyright © 2021 Mody, Zhang, Li, Fletcher, Akhter, Jarrett, Zhang, Yu, Thurecht, Mahony and Mitter. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Mody, Karishma T. Zhang, Bing Li, Xun Fletcher, Nicholas L. Akhter, Dewan T. Jarrett, Sandy Zhang, Jun Yu, Chengzhong Thurecht, Kristofer J. Mahony, Timothy J. Mitter, Neena Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title | Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title_full | Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title_fullStr | Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title_short | Characterization of the Biodistribution of a Silica Vesicle Nanovaccine Carrying a Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Protective Antigen With in vivo Live Animal Imaging |
title_sort | characterization of the biodistribution of a silica vesicle nanovaccine carrying a rhipicephalus (boophilus) microplus protective antigen with in vivo live animal imaging |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537291 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.606652 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT modykarishmat characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT zhangbing characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT lixun characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT fletchernicholasl characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT akhterdewant characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT jarrettsandy characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT zhangjun characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT yuchengzhong characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT thurechtkristoferj characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT mahonytimothyj characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging AT mitterneena characterizationofthebiodistributionofasilicavesiclenanovaccinecarryingarhipicephalusboophilusmicroplusprotectiveantigenwithinvivoliveanimalimaging |