Cargando…

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever

EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, Søren Saxmose, Alvarez, Julio, Bicout, Dominique Joseph, Calistri, Paolo, Depner, Klaus, Drewe, Julian Ashley, Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno, Gonzales Rojas, José Luis, Gortázar Schmidt, Christian, Herskin, Mette, Michel, Virginie, Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel, Pasquali, Paolo, Roberts, Helen Clare, Sihvonen, Liisa Helena, Spoolder, Hans, Ståhl, Karl, Velarde, Antonio, Viltrop, Arvo, Winckler, Christoph, De Clercq, Kris, Klement, Eyal, Stegeman, Jan Arend, Gubbins, Simon, Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni, Broglia, Alessandro, Van der Stede, Yves, Zancanaro, Gabriele, Aznar, Inma
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552298
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402
_version_ 1783645076696596480
author Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
author_facet Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
collection PubMed
description EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7848183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78481832021-02-05 Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7848183/ /pubmed/33552298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Scientific Opinion
Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
Alvarez, Julio
Bicout, Dominique Joseph
Calistri, Paolo
Depner, Klaus
Drewe, Julian Ashley
Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
Gortázar Schmidt, Christian
Herskin, Mette
Michel, Virginie
Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
Pasquali, Paolo
Roberts, Helen Clare
Sihvonen, Liisa Helena
Spoolder, Hans
Ståhl, Karl
Velarde, Antonio
Viltrop, Arvo
Winckler, Christoph
De Clercq, Kris
Klement, Eyal
Stegeman, Jan Arend
Gubbins, Simon
Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni
Broglia, Alessandro
Van der Stede, Yves
Zancanaro, Gabriele
Aznar, Inma
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_full Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_fullStr Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_full_unstemmed Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_short Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
title_sort scientific opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: african swine fever
topic Scientific Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552298
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402
work_keys_str_mv AT scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT nielsensørensaxmose scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT alvarezjulio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT bicoutdominiquejoseph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT calistripaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT depnerklaus scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT drewejulianashley scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT garinbastujibruno scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT gortazarschmidtchristian scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT herskinmette scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT michelvirginie scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT mirandachuecamiguelangel scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT pasqualipaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT robertshelenclare scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT sihvonenliisahelena scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT spoolderhans scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT stahlkarl scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT velardeantonio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT viltroparvo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT wincklerchristoph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT declercqkris scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT klementeyal scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT stegemanjanarend scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT gubbinssimon scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT antoniousotiriaeleni scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT brogliaalessandro scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT vanderstedeyves scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT zancanarogabriele scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever
AT aznarinma scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever