Cargando…
Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever
EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402 |
_version_ | 1783645076696596480 |
---|---|
author | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma |
author_facet | Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma |
collection | PubMed |
description | EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7848183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78481832021-02-05 Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma EFSA J Scientific Opinion EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases (‘Animal Health Law’). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for African Swine Fever (ASF). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts reviewed the effectiveness of: (i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, (ii) monitoring period and (iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zone, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, specific details of the model used for the assessment of the laboratory sampling procedures for ASF are presented here. Here, also, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. In summary, several sampling procedures as described in the diagnostic manual for ASF were considered ineffective and a suggestion to exclude, or to substitute with more effective procedures was made. The monitoring period was assessed as non‐effective for several scenarios and a longer monitoring period was suggested to ensure detection of potentially infected herds. It was demonstrated that the surveillance zone comprises 95% of the infections from an affected establishment, and therefore is considered effective. Recommendations provided for each of the scenarios assessed aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to ASF. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7848183/ /pubmed/33552298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402 Text en © 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Opinion Nielsen, Søren Saxmose Alvarez, Julio Bicout, Dominique Joseph Calistri, Paolo Depner, Klaus Drewe, Julian Ashley Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno Gonzales Rojas, José Luis Gortázar Schmidt, Christian Herskin, Mette Michel, Virginie Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel Pasquali, Paolo Roberts, Helen Clare Sihvonen, Liisa Helena Spoolder, Hans Ståhl, Karl Velarde, Antonio Viltrop, Arvo Winckler, Christoph De Clercq, Kris Klement, Eyal Stegeman, Jan Arend Gubbins, Simon Antoniou, Sotiria‐Eleni Broglia, Alessandro Van der Stede, Yves Zancanaro, Gabriele Aznar, Inma Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title | Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title_full | Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title_fullStr | Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title_full_unstemmed | Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title_short | Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category A diseases of Animal Health Law: African Swine Fever |
title_sort | scientific opinion on the assessment of the control measures of the category a diseases of animal health law: african swine fever |
topic | Scientific Opinion |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552298 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6402 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT nielsensørensaxmose scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT alvarezjulio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT bicoutdominiquejoseph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT calistripaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT depnerklaus scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT drewejulianashley scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT garinbastujibruno scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT gonzalesrojasjoseluis scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT gortazarschmidtchristian scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT herskinmette scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT michelvirginie scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT mirandachuecamiguelangel scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT pasqualipaolo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT robertshelenclare scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT sihvonenliisahelena scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT spoolderhans scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT stahlkarl scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT velardeantonio scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT viltroparvo scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT wincklerchristoph scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT declercqkris scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT klementeyal scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT stegemanjanarend scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT gubbinssimon scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT antoniousotiriaeleni scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT brogliaalessandro scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT vanderstedeyves scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT zancanarogabriele scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever AT aznarinma scientificopinionontheassessmentofthecontrolmeasuresofthecategoryadiseasesofanimalhealthlawafricanswinefever |