Cargando…

Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys

Mitigating the spread of disease is crucial for the well-being of agricultural production systems. Implementing biosecurity disease prevention measures can be expensive, so producers must balance the costs of biosecurity investments with the expected benefits of reducing the risk of infections. To i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Clark, Eric M., Merrill, Scott C., Trinity, Luke, Bucini, Gabriela, Cheney, Nicholas, Langle-Chimal, Ollin, Shrum, Trisha, Koliba, Christopher, Zia, Asim, Smith, Julia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.556668
_version_ 1783645083816427520
author Clark, Eric M.
Merrill, Scott C.
Trinity, Luke
Bucini, Gabriela
Cheney, Nicholas
Langle-Chimal, Ollin
Shrum, Trisha
Koliba, Christopher
Zia, Asim
Smith, Julia M.
author_facet Clark, Eric M.
Merrill, Scott C.
Trinity, Luke
Bucini, Gabriela
Cheney, Nicholas
Langle-Chimal, Ollin
Shrum, Trisha
Koliba, Christopher
Zia, Asim
Smith, Julia M.
author_sort Clark, Eric M.
collection PubMed
description Mitigating the spread of disease is crucial for the well-being of agricultural production systems. Implementing biosecurity disease prevention measures can be expensive, so producers must balance the costs of biosecurity investments with the expected benefits of reducing the risk of infections. To investigate the risk associated with this decision making process, we developed an online experimental game that simulates biosecurity investment allocation of a pork production facility during an outbreak. Participants are presented with several scenarios that vary the visibility of the disease status and biosecurity protection implemented at neighboring facilities. Certain rounds allowed participants to spend resources to reduce uncertainty and reveal neighboring biosecurity and/or disease status. We then test how this uncertainty affects the decisions to spend simulation dollars to increase biosecurity and reduce risk. We recruited 50 attendees from the 2018 World Pork Expo to participate in our simulation. We compared their performance to an opportunity sample of 50 online participants from the survey crowdsourcing tool, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). With respect to biosecurity investment, we did not find a significant difference between the risk behaviors of industry professionals and those of MTurk participants for each set of experimental scenarios. Notably, we found that our sample of industry professionals opted to pay to reveal disease and biosecurity information more often than MTurk participants. However, the biosecurity investment decisions were not significantly different during rounds in which additional information could be purchased. To further validate these findings, we compared the risk associated with each group's responses using a well-established risk assessment survey implementing paired lottery choices. Interestingly, we did not find a correlation in risk quantified with simulated biosecurity investment in comparison to the paired lottery choice survey. This may be evidence that general economic risk preferences may not always translate into simulated behavioral risk, perhaps due to the contextual immersion provided by experimental gaming simulations. Online recruitment tools can provide cost effective research quality data that can be rapidly assembled in comparison to industry professionals, who may be more challenging to sample at scale. Using a convenience sample of industry professionals for validation can also provide additional insights into the decision making process. These findings lend support to using online experimental simulations for interpreting risk associated with a complex decision mechanism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7848213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78482132021-02-02 Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys Clark, Eric M. Merrill, Scott C. Trinity, Luke Bucini, Gabriela Cheney, Nicholas Langle-Chimal, Ollin Shrum, Trisha Koliba, Christopher Zia, Asim Smith, Julia M. Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Mitigating the spread of disease is crucial for the well-being of agricultural production systems. Implementing biosecurity disease prevention measures can be expensive, so producers must balance the costs of biosecurity investments with the expected benefits of reducing the risk of infections. To investigate the risk associated with this decision making process, we developed an online experimental game that simulates biosecurity investment allocation of a pork production facility during an outbreak. Participants are presented with several scenarios that vary the visibility of the disease status and biosecurity protection implemented at neighboring facilities. Certain rounds allowed participants to spend resources to reduce uncertainty and reveal neighboring biosecurity and/or disease status. We then test how this uncertainty affects the decisions to spend simulation dollars to increase biosecurity and reduce risk. We recruited 50 attendees from the 2018 World Pork Expo to participate in our simulation. We compared their performance to an opportunity sample of 50 online participants from the survey crowdsourcing tool, Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk). With respect to biosecurity investment, we did not find a significant difference between the risk behaviors of industry professionals and those of MTurk participants for each set of experimental scenarios. Notably, we found that our sample of industry professionals opted to pay to reveal disease and biosecurity information more often than MTurk participants. However, the biosecurity investment decisions were not significantly different during rounds in which additional information could be purchased. To further validate these findings, we compared the risk associated with each group's responses using a well-established risk assessment survey implementing paired lottery choices. Interestingly, we did not find a correlation in risk quantified with simulated biosecurity investment in comparison to the paired lottery choice survey. This may be evidence that general economic risk preferences may not always translate into simulated behavioral risk, perhaps due to the contextual immersion provided by experimental gaming simulations. Online recruitment tools can provide cost effective research quality data that can be rapidly assembled in comparison to industry professionals, who may be more challenging to sample at scale. Using a convenience sample of industry professionals for validation can also provide additional insights into the decision making process. These findings lend support to using online experimental simulations for interpreting risk associated with a complex decision mechanism. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7848213/ /pubmed/33537351 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.556668 Text en Copyright © 2021 Clark, Merrill, Trinity, Bucini, Cheney, Langle-Chimal, Shrum, Koliba, Zia and Smith. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Clark, Eric M.
Merrill, Scott C.
Trinity, Luke
Bucini, Gabriela
Cheney, Nicholas
Langle-Chimal, Ollin
Shrum, Trisha
Koliba, Christopher
Zia, Asim
Smith, Julia M.
Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title_full Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title_fullStr Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title_full_unstemmed Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title_short Emulating Agricultural Disease Management: Comparing Risk Preferences Between Industry Professionals and Online Participants Using Experimental Gaming Simulations and Paired Lottery Choice Surveys
title_sort emulating agricultural disease management: comparing risk preferences between industry professionals and online participants using experimental gaming simulations and paired lottery choice surveys
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537351
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.556668
work_keys_str_mv AT clarkericm emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT merrillscottc emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT trinityluke emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT bucinigabriela emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT cheneynicholas emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT langlechimalollin emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT shrumtrisha emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT kolibachristopher emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT ziaasim emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys
AT smithjuliam emulatingagriculturaldiseasemanagementcomparingriskpreferencesbetweenindustryprofessionalsandonlineparticipantsusingexperimentalgamingsimulationsandpairedlotterychoicesurveys