Cargando…

Plasma symmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine concentrations and glomerular filtration rate in cats with normal and decreased renal function

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the gold standard in assessing renal function but is impractical. Serum creatinine (sCr) has limited sensitivity in identifying early chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) has been commercialized as more accurate bioma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brans, Marleen, Daminet, Sylvie, Mortier, Femke, Duchateau, Luc, Lefebvre, Hervé P., Paepe, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33274800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.15975
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the gold standard in assessing renal function but is impractical. Serum creatinine (sCr) has limited sensitivity in identifying early chronic kidney disease (CKD), whereas symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) has been commercialized as more accurate biomarker. Studies comparing SDMA and sCr with GFR in cats are limited. OBJECTIVES: To further investigate the diagnostic performance of SDMA in nonazotemic and azotemic cats. ANIMALS: Forty‐nine client‐owned cats: 17 cats with CKD, 15 cats with diabetes mellitus (DM), and 17 healthy cats. METHODS: Retrospective study using spare blood samples from cats with documented sCr and GFR results for SDMA analysis. Diagnostic performances of SDMA and sCr were evaluated using correlation coefficients, sensitivities, specificities, and receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: Compared to healthy cats and cats with DM, CKD cats had significantly higher SDMA(plasma) (26.7 ± 9.9 μg/dL) and sCr (249.7 ± 71.6 μmol/L [2.8 ± 0.8 mg/dL]; both P < .001) values. SDMA(plasma) (τ (B) = −0.57; P < .001) and sCr (τ (B) = −0.56; P < .001) were significantly correlated with GFR. SDMA(plasma) (τ (B) = 0.52; P < .001) had a significant relationship with sCr. SDMA(plasma) and sCr had similar sensitivity (76%‐94% and 71%‐88%, respectively) in detecting reduced renal function. Creatinine had higher specificity (94%‐96%) than SDMA(plasma) (75%‐76%) (P < .05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In this study of azotemic and nonazotemic cats, SDMA was a reliable marker to identify decreased GFR. However, superiority of SDMA over sCr could not be confirmed.