Cargando…

Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib

ROS1 rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which can be treated effectively with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ROS1/MET/ALK rearrangements. Diverse efficacy was observed in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients. Because of its rar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Yueming, Sheng, Wang, Hu, Weiguo, Lin, Jing, Liu, Junjun, Yu, Bing, Mao, Xinru, Zhang, Lu, Huang, Jin, Wang, Guangsuo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cognizant Communication Corporation 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15509372008132
_version_ 1783645118676336640
author He, Yueming
Sheng, Wang
Hu, Weiguo
Lin, Jing
Liu, Junjun
Yu, Bing
Mao, Xinru
Zhang, Lu
Huang, Jin
Wang, Guangsuo
author_facet He, Yueming
Sheng, Wang
Hu, Weiguo
Lin, Jing
Liu, Junjun
Yu, Bing
Mao, Xinru
Zhang, Lu
Huang, Jin
Wang, Guangsuo
author_sort He, Yueming
collection PubMed
description ROS1 rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which can be treated effectively with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ROS1/MET/ALK rearrangements. Diverse efficacy was observed in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients. Because of its rareness, very limited studies have investigated the correlation between different fusion partners and response to crizotinib. In this study, we retrospectively screened 6,235 advanced NSCLC patients (stage IIIB to IV) from five hospitals and identified 106 patients with ROS1 rearrangements based on either plasma or tumor tissue testing using capture-based targeted sequencing. The most frequently occurring fusion partners included cluster of differentiation 74 (CD74), ezrin (EZR), syndecan 4 (SDC4), and tropomyosin 3 (TPM3), occurring in 49.1%, 17%, 14.2%, and 4.7% of patients, respectively. Among them, 38 patients were treated with crizotinib. Seventeen patients were treatment naive, and the remaining were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Collectively, there was no significant difference among patients with various types of ROS1 fusion partners in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who were treated with crizotinib as first-line therapy showed comparable PFS (p = 0.26) to patients who were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. For treatment-naive patients, patients with low baseline ROS1 allelic fraction (AF) had a statistically significant longer OS than those with high ROS1 AF (184 vs. 110 days, p = 0.048). Collectively, our study demonstrates that ROS1 (+) patients with various fusion partners show comparable efficacy to crizotinib.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7848361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Cognizant Communication Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78483612021-02-16 Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib He, Yueming Sheng, Wang Hu, Weiguo Lin, Jing Liu, Junjun Yu, Bing Mao, Xinru Zhang, Lu Huang, Jin Wang, Guangsuo Oncol Res Article ROS1 rearrangements define a distinct molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which can be treated effectively with crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) targeting ROS1/MET/ALK rearrangements. Diverse efficacy was observed in ROS1-rearranged NSCLC patients. Because of its rareness, very limited studies have investigated the correlation between different fusion partners and response to crizotinib. In this study, we retrospectively screened 6,235 advanced NSCLC patients (stage IIIB to IV) from five hospitals and identified 106 patients with ROS1 rearrangements based on either plasma or tumor tissue testing using capture-based targeted sequencing. The most frequently occurring fusion partners included cluster of differentiation 74 (CD74), ezrin (EZR), syndecan 4 (SDC4), and tropomyosin 3 (TPM3), occurring in 49.1%, 17%, 14.2%, and 4.7% of patients, respectively. Among them, 38 patients were treated with crizotinib. Seventeen patients were treatment naive, and the remaining were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Collectively, there was no significant difference among patients with various types of ROS1 fusion partners in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Patients who were treated with crizotinib as first-line therapy showed comparable PFS (p = 0.26) to patients who were previously treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. For treatment-naive patients, patients with low baseline ROS1 allelic fraction (AF) had a statistically significant longer OS than those with high ROS1 AF (184 vs. 110 days, p = 0.048). Collectively, our study demonstrates that ROS1 (+) patients with various fusion partners show comparable efficacy to crizotinib. Cognizant Communication Corporation 2019-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7848361/ /pubmed/30940295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15509372008132 Text en Copyright © 2019 Cognizant, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
He, Yueming
Sheng, Wang
Hu, Weiguo
Lin, Jing
Liu, Junjun
Yu, Bing
Mao, Xinru
Zhang, Lu
Huang, Jin
Wang, Guangsuo
Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title_full Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title_fullStr Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title_full_unstemmed Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title_short Different Types of ROS1 Fusion Partners Yield Comparable Efficacy to Crizotinib
title_sort different types of ros1 fusion partners yield comparable efficacy to crizotinib
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30940295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15509372008132
work_keys_str_mv AT heyueming differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT shengwang differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT huweiguo differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT linjing differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT liujunjun differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT yubing differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT maoxinru differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT zhanglu differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT huangjin differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib
AT wangguangsuo differenttypesofros1fusionpartnersyieldcomparableefficacytocrizotinib