Cargando…

Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)

INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex procedure with high perioperative morbidity. In an effort to reduce complications, robotic-assisted RC (RARC) has been adopted as a minimally invasive alternative to the open approach (ORC). Herein, we examine post-operative outcomes of the two surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo, Garcia-Castaneda, Jenny, Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh, Zeng, Jiping, Batai, Ken, Lee, Benjamin R., Chipollini, Juan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Polish Urological Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552567
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0230
_version_ 1783645211217362944
author Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo
Garcia-Castaneda, Jenny
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
Zeng, Jiping
Batai, Ken
Lee, Benjamin R.
Chipollini, Juan
author_facet Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo
Garcia-Castaneda, Jenny
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
Zeng, Jiping
Batai, Ken
Lee, Benjamin R.
Chipollini, Juan
author_sort Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex procedure with high perioperative morbidity. In an effort to reduce complications, robotic-assisted RC (RARC) has been adopted as a minimally invasive alternative to the open approach (ORC). Herein, we examine post-operative outcomes of the two surgical approaches in the United States (US) using a large all-payer database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) codes, patient who underwent RC were captured from National Inpatient Sample (2008–2014). ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify post-operative complications. Trends in the utilization of RARC were analyzed. Logistic and log-linear regression accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years were performed to analyze outcomes after adjustment of pertinent covariates. RESULTS: Of 11,189 patients, 14% underwent RARC. RARC was performed in more teaching hospitals, male patients, those with private insurance, and lower comorbidity score. Performance of RARC steadily increased over the study period (p <0.01). In the last year of the study, 22.8% of cases performed robotically. The weighted average length-of-stay were 10.4 and 8.79 days for ORC and RARC, respectively (p <0.01). In multivariable analyses, RARC was associated with decreased blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, pneumonia, surgical-site infection, wound and respiratory complications (all, p <0.05). No significant differences were found for in-hospital mortality, cardiac, genitourinary, and vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of RARC has significantly increased in recent years. RARC appears safe and feasible for select patients. Earlier discharge and lower complications were noted for those undergoing RARC across different hospital systems nationwide.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7848836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Polish Urological Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78488362021-02-04 Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014) Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo Garcia-Castaneda, Jenny Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh Zeng, Jiping Batai, Ken Lee, Benjamin R. Chipollini, Juan Cent European J Urol Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a complex procedure with high perioperative morbidity. In an effort to reduce complications, robotic-assisted RC (RARC) has been adopted as a minimally invasive alternative to the open approach (ORC). Herein, we examine post-operative outcomes of the two surgical approaches in the United States (US) using a large all-payer database. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using International Classification of Disease, ninth revision (ICD-9) codes, patient who underwent RC were captured from National Inpatient Sample (2008–2014). ICD-9 diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify post-operative complications. Trends in the utilization of RARC were analyzed. Logistic and log-linear regression accounting for hospital sample weights and sampling years were performed to analyze outcomes after adjustment of pertinent covariates. RESULTS: Of 11,189 patients, 14% underwent RARC. RARC was performed in more teaching hospitals, male patients, those with private insurance, and lower comorbidity score. Performance of RARC steadily increased over the study period (p <0.01). In the last year of the study, 22.8% of cases performed robotically. The weighted average length-of-stay were 10.4 and 8.79 days for ORC and RARC, respectively (p <0.01). In multivariable analyses, RARC was associated with decreased blood transfusion, parenteral nutrition, pneumonia, surgical-site infection, wound and respiratory complications (all, p <0.05). No significant differences were found for in-hospital mortality, cardiac, genitourinary, and vascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: Performance of RARC has significantly increased in recent years. RARC appears safe and feasible for select patients. Earlier discharge and lower complications were noted for those undergoing RARC across different hospital systems nationwide. Polish Urological Association 2020-11-04 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7848836/ /pubmed/33552567 http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0230 Text en Copyright by Polish Urological Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Harb-De la Rosa, Alfredo
Garcia-Castaneda, Jenny
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
Zeng, Jiping
Batai, Ken
Lee, Benjamin R.
Chipollini, Juan
Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title_full Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title_fullStr Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title_full_unstemmed Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title_short Perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
title_sort perioperative outcomes of open vs. robotic radical cystectomy: a nationwide comparative analysis (2008–2014)
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7848836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552567
http://dx.doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2020.0230
work_keys_str_mv AT harbdelarosaalfredo perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT garciacastanedajenny perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT hsuchiuhsieh perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT zengjiping perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT bataiken perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT leebenjaminr perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014
AT chipollinijuan perioperativeoutcomesofopenvsroboticradicalcystectomyanationwidecomparativeanalysis20082014