Cargando…

The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer

The proportion of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 prostate cancers at prostate biopsy has a clinically significant impact on risk stratification for patients with prostate cancer. In pathological diagnosis including GP 4, a biopsy Gleason score (GS) of 3+4 has a more favorable prognosis than a GS of 4+3 and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tohi, Yoichiro, Matsuda, Iori, Fujiwara, Kengo, Harada, Satoshi, Ito, Ayako, Yamasaki, Mari, Miyauchi, Yasuyuki, Matsuoka, Yuki, Kato, Takuma, Taoka, Rikiya, Tsunemori, Hiroyuki, Ueda, Nobufumi, Sugimoto, Mikio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: D.A. Spandidos 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604046
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2218
_version_ 1783645241045155840
author Tohi, Yoichiro
Matsuda, Iori
Fujiwara, Kengo
Harada, Satoshi
Ito, Ayako
Yamasaki, Mari
Miyauchi, Yasuyuki
Matsuoka, Yuki
Kato, Takuma
Taoka, Rikiya
Tsunemori, Hiroyuki
Ueda, Nobufumi
Sugimoto, Mikio
author_facet Tohi, Yoichiro
Matsuda, Iori
Fujiwara, Kengo
Harada, Satoshi
Ito, Ayako
Yamasaki, Mari
Miyauchi, Yasuyuki
Matsuoka, Yuki
Kato, Takuma
Taoka, Rikiya
Tsunemori, Hiroyuki
Ueda, Nobufumi
Sugimoto, Mikio
author_sort Tohi, Yoichiro
collection PubMed
description The proportion of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 prostate cancers at prostate biopsy has a clinically significant impact on risk stratification for patients with prostate cancer. In pathological diagnosis including GP 4, a biopsy Gleason score (GS) of 3+4 has a more favorable prognosis than a GS of 4+3 and 4+4. However, the discrepancy between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens is well known. The current study investigated the clinical parameters and biopsy specimens associated with pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in biopsies with a GS of 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer. A total of 302 patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between August 2013 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 103 patients had biopsies with GSs of 4+3 and GS 4+4 (unfavorable pathology). The proportion of patients who were downgraded from unfavorable disease to GS ≤3+4 (favorable pathology) in prostatectomy specimens was investigated. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between clinical parameters and downgrading in prostatectomy specimens. A total of 43 patients (41.7%) were downgraded from biopsy GS to prostatectomy GS. The proportions of downgrade in biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 were 14.6 and 27.1%, respectively. The percentage of highest GS out of positive biopsy cores and the maximum percentage of cancer involvement within a positive core with the highest GS were lower in the downgrade group than in the no downgrade group (45 vs. 66.7%, P=0.025; 20 vs. 30%, P=0.048, respectively). When performing multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for downgrade was lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores (odds ratio, 2.469; 95% confidence interval, 1.029-5.925 P=0.043). In conclusion, patients with biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 often exhibit a downgrade to GS 3+4 or less in prostatectomy specimens. The lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores was associated with downgrade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher D.A. Spandidos
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78490602021-02-17 The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer Tohi, Yoichiro Matsuda, Iori Fujiwara, Kengo Harada, Satoshi Ito, Ayako Yamasaki, Mari Miyauchi, Yasuyuki Matsuoka, Yuki Kato, Takuma Taoka, Rikiya Tsunemori, Hiroyuki Ueda, Nobufumi Sugimoto, Mikio Mol Clin Oncol Articles The proportion of Gleason pattern (GP) 4 prostate cancers at prostate biopsy has a clinically significant impact on risk stratification for patients with prostate cancer. In pathological diagnosis including GP 4, a biopsy Gleason score (GS) of 3+4 has a more favorable prognosis than a GS of 4+3 and 4+4. However, the discrepancy between biopsy and prostatectomy specimens is well known. The current study investigated the clinical parameters and biopsy specimens associated with pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in biopsies with a GS of 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer. A total of 302 patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between August 2013 and May 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 103 patients had biopsies with GSs of 4+3 and GS 4+4 (unfavorable pathology). The proportion of patients who were downgraded from unfavorable disease to GS ≤3+4 (favorable pathology) in prostatectomy specimens was investigated. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the association between clinical parameters and downgrading in prostatectomy specimens. A total of 43 patients (41.7%) were downgraded from biopsy GS to prostatectomy GS. The proportions of downgrade in biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 were 14.6 and 27.1%, respectively. The percentage of highest GS out of positive biopsy cores and the maximum percentage of cancer involvement within a positive core with the highest GS were lower in the downgrade group than in the no downgrade group (45 vs. 66.7%, P=0.025; 20 vs. 30%, P=0.048, respectively). When performing multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only significant predictor for downgrade was lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores (odds ratio, 2.469; 95% confidence interval, 1.029-5.925 P=0.043). In conclusion, patients with biopsy GS 4+4 and 4+3 often exhibit a downgrade to GS 3+4 or less in prostatectomy specimens. The lower percentage of highest GS cores out of positive biopsy cores was associated with downgrade. D.A. Spandidos 2021-03 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7849060/ /pubmed/33604046 http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2218 Text en Copyright: © Tohi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Articles
Tohi, Yoichiro
Matsuda, Iori
Fujiwara, Kengo
Harada, Satoshi
Ito, Ayako
Yamasaki, Mari
Miyauchi, Yasuyuki
Matsuoka, Yuki
Kato, Takuma
Taoka, Rikiya
Tsunemori, Hiroyuki
Ueda, Nobufumi
Sugimoto, Mikio
The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title_full The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title_fullStr The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title_short The predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy Gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
title_sort predictive factor for pathological downgrading after prostatectomy in patients with biopsy gleason score 4+3 or 4+4 prostate cancer
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33604046
http://dx.doi.org/10.3892/mco.2021.2218
work_keys_str_mv AT tohiyoichiro thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT matsudaiori thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT fujiwarakengo thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT haradasatoshi thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT itoayako thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT yamasakimari thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT miyauchiyasuyuki thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT matsuokayuki thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT katotakuma thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT taokarikiya thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT tsunemorihiroyuki thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT uedanobufumi thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT sugimotomikio thepredictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT tohiyoichiro predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT matsudaiori predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT fujiwarakengo predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT haradasatoshi predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT itoayako predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT yamasakimari predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT miyauchiyasuyuki predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT matsuokayuki predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT katotakuma predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT taokarikiya predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT tsunemorihiroyuki predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT uedanobufumi predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer
AT sugimotomikio predictivefactorforpathologicaldowngradingafterprostatectomyinpatientswithbiopsygleasonscore43or44prostatecancer