Cargando…
Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The commitment to engage patients as partners in research has been described as a political, moral and ethical imperative. Researchers feel ill-equipped to deal with potential ethical implications of engaging patients as partners. The aim of this study is to identify the ethical consider...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00254-5 |
_version_ | 1783645246765137920 |
---|---|
author | Ludwig, Claire Graham, Ian D. Lavoie, Josee Gifford, Wendy Stacey, Dawn |
author_facet | Ludwig, Claire Graham, Ian D. Lavoie, Josee Gifford, Wendy Stacey, Dawn |
author_sort | Ludwig, Claire |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The commitment to engage patients as partners in research has been described as a political, moral and ethical imperative. Researchers feel ill-equipped to deal with potential ethical implications of engaging patients as partners. The aim of this study is to identify the ethical considerations related to engaging frail and seriously ill (FSI) patients as partners in research. METHODS: We conducted a sub-analysis of a prior systematic review of 30 studies that engaged FSI patients as partners in research. Studies were included if they reported ethical considerations associated with partnering. We performed deductive content analysis, data were categorized according to Beauchamp and Childress’ Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2019): autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included. Common ethical considerations reported in relation to the principles were: autonomy – promoting desired level of involvement, addressing relational and intellectual power, facilitating knowledge and understanding of research; non-maleficence – protection from financial burden, physical and emotional suffering; beneficence – putting things right for others, showing value-added, and supporting patient-partners; and, justice – achieving appropriate representation, mutual respect for contributions, and distributing risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS: When partnering with FSI patients, research teams need to establish shared values and ensure processes are in place to identify and address ethical issues. Researchers and patients should work together to clarify the intent and outcomes of the partnership, actively address power differentials, recognize and minimize the potential for unintended harm, and strive to maximize the benefits of partnership. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for the original systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42019127994). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7849091 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78490912021-02-03 Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review Ludwig, Claire Graham, Ian D. Lavoie, Josee Gifford, Wendy Stacey, Dawn Res Involv Engagem Review Article BACKGROUND: The commitment to engage patients as partners in research has been described as a political, moral and ethical imperative. Researchers feel ill-equipped to deal with potential ethical implications of engaging patients as partners. The aim of this study is to identify the ethical considerations related to engaging frail and seriously ill (FSI) patients as partners in research. METHODS: We conducted a sub-analysis of a prior systematic review of 30 studies that engaged FSI patients as partners in research. Studies were included if they reported ethical considerations associated with partnering. We performed deductive content analysis, data were categorized according to Beauchamp and Childress’ Principles of Biomedical Ethics (2019): autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies were included. Common ethical considerations reported in relation to the principles were: autonomy – promoting desired level of involvement, addressing relational and intellectual power, facilitating knowledge and understanding of research; non-maleficence – protection from financial burden, physical and emotional suffering; beneficence – putting things right for others, showing value-added, and supporting patient-partners; and, justice – achieving appropriate representation, mutual respect for contributions, and distributing risks and benefits. CONCLUSIONS: When partnering with FSI patients, research teams need to establish shared values and ensure processes are in place to identify and address ethical issues. Researchers and patients should work together to clarify the intent and outcomes of the partnership, actively address power differentials, recognize and minimize the potential for unintended harm, and strive to maximize the benefits of partnership. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol for the original systematic review has been registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO (CRD42019127994). BioMed Central 2021-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7849091/ /pubmed/33517912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00254-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Ludwig, Claire Graham, Ian D. Lavoie, Josee Gifford, Wendy Stacey, Dawn Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title | Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title_full | Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title_short | Ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
title_sort | ethical considerations for engaging frail and seriously ill patients as partners in research: sub-analysis of a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849091/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33517912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-021-00254-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ludwigclaire ethicalconsiderationsforengagingfrailandseriouslyillpatientsaspartnersinresearchsubanalysisofasystematicreview AT grahamiand ethicalconsiderationsforengagingfrailandseriouslyillpatientsaspartnersinresearchsubanalysisofasystematicreview AT lavoiejosee ethicalconsiderationsforengagingfrailandseriouslyillpatientsaspartnersinresearchsubanalysisofasystematicreview AT giffordwendy ethicalconsiderationsforengagingfrailandseriouslyillpatientsaspartnersinresearchsubanalysisofasystematicreview AT staceydawn ethicalconsiderationsforengagingfrailandseriouslyillpatientsaspartnersinresearchsubanalysisofasystematicreview |