Cargando…
Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans
BACKGROUND: Multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans can alleviate issues with bone or joint positioning during scan acquisition. The repeatability of these reconstructions is dependent on human operators applying reconstruction criteria, and therefore is subject to error, which...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-021-00047-7 |
_version_ | 1783645256468660224 |
---|---|
author | Miles, James E. Buelund, Lene E. |
author_facet | Miles, James E. Buelund, Lene E. |
author_sort | Miles, James E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans can alleviate issues with bone or joint positioning during scan acquisition. The repeatability of these reconstructions is dependent on human operators applying reconstruction criteria, and therefore is subject to error, which could affect measurement reliability for angular or spatial measurements made for orthopaedic surgery. We describe a method for quantifying inter-reconstruction variability numerically and graphically using metadata from the CT header to find vectors describing reconstruction axis alignment. The approach is demonstrated using 3 sets of computed tomographic reconstructions of 24 vulpine femorotibial joints. RESULTS: Vectors describing axis alignments permitted identification and subsequent analysis of deviations from optimal alignment between reconstruction sets. For the worked example, alignment deviations equivalent to femoral abduction/adduction were nearly twice those for extension/flexion, and simulation of the effects of these deviations on measurements closely matched published data. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented here is straightforward and permits numerical and graphical analysis of reconstruction variability. Reconstruction alignment variability should be considered before adopting new reconstruction criteria for clinical use, and evaluated whenever there is suspicion that reconstruction variability could unduly influence subsequent measurements. These evaluations may help drive improvements in reconstruction criteria. The methods described here could also be employed for comparing patient positioning between scans and between different scan modalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7849145 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78491452021-02-03 Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans Miles, James E. Buelund, Lene E. BMC Biomed Eng Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography (CT) scans can alleviate issues with bone or joint positioning during scan acquisition. The repeatability of these reconstructions is dependent on human operators applying reconstruction criteria, and therefore is subject to error, which could affect measurement reliability for angular or spatial measurements made for orthopaedic surgery. We describe a method for quantifying inter-reconstruction variability numerically and graphically using metadata from the CT header to find vectors describing reconstruction axis alignment. The approach is demonstrated using 3 sets of computed tomographic reconstructions of 24 vulpine femorotibial joints. RESULTS: Vectors describing axis alignments permitted identification and subsequent analysis of deviations from optimal alignment between reconstruction sets. For the worked example, alignment deviations equivalent to femoral abduction/adduction were nearly twice those for extension/flexion, and simulation of the effects of these deviations on measurements closely matched published data. CONCLUSIONS: The method presented here is straightforward and permits numerical and graphical analysis of reconstruction variability. Reconstruction alignment variability should be considered before adopting new reconstruction criteria for clinical use, and evaluated whenever there is suspicion that reconstruction variability could unduly influence subsequent measurements. These evaluations may help drive improvements in reconstruction criteria. The methods described here could also be employed for comparing patient positioning between scans and between different scan modalities. BioMed Central 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7849145/ /pubmed/33522969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-021-00047-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Miles, James E. Buelund, Lene E. Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title | Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title_full | Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title_fullStr | Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title_short | Quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
title_sort | quantifying the variability between multiple multiplanar reconstructions of computed tomography scans |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849145/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33522969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42490-021-00047-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milesjamese quantifyingthevariabilitybetweenmultiplemultiplanarreconstructionsofcomputedtomographyscans AT buelundlenee quantifyingthevariabilitybetweenmultiplemultiplanarreconstructionsofcomputedtomographyscans |