Cargando…

Reproducible image handling and analysis

Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Kota, Nørrelykke, Simon F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480052
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889
_version_ 1783645278225563648
author Miura, Kota
Nørrelykke, Simon F
author_facet Miura, Kota
Nørrelykke, Simon F
author_sort Miura, Kota
collection PubMed
description Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to address this problem. A new norm for reporting reproducible image analyses will diminish mishandling, as it will alert co‐authors, referees, and journals to aberrant image data processing or, if published nonetheless, it will document it to the reader. To promote this norm, we discuss the effectiveness of this approach and give some step‐by‐step instructions for publishing reproducible image data processing and analysis workflows.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78493012021-02-04 Reproducible image handling and analysis Miura, Kota Nørrelykke, Simon F EMBO J Commentary Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to address this problem. A new norm for reporting reproducible image analyses will diminish mishandling, as it will alert co‐authors, referees, and journals to aberrant image data processing or, if published nonetheless, it will document it to the reader. To promote this norm, we discuss the effectiveness of this approach and give some step‐by‐step instructions for publishing reproducible image data processing and analysis workflows. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-22 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7849301/ /pubmed/33480052 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Miura, Kota
Nørrelykke, Simon F
Reproducible image handling and analysis
title Reproducible image handling and analysis
title_full Reproducible image handling and analysis
title_fullStr Reproducible image handling and analysis
title_full_unstemmed Reproducible image handling and analysis
title_short Reproducible image handling and analysis
title_sort reproducible image handling and analysis
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480052
http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889
work_keys_str_mv AT miurakota reproducibleimagehandlingandanalysis
AT nørrelykkesimonf reproducibleimagehandlingandanalysis