Cargando…
Reproducible image handling and analysis
Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480052 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889 |
_version_ | 1783645278225563648 |
---|---|
author | Miura, Kota Nørrelykke, Simon F |
author_facet | Miura, Kota Nørrelykke, Simon F |
author_sort | Miura, Kota |
collection | PubMed |
description | Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to address this problem. A new norm for reporting reproducible image analyses will diminish mishandling, as it will alert co‐authors, referees, and journals to aberrant image data processing or, if published nonetheless, it will document it to the reader. To promote this norm, we discuss the effectiveness of this approach and give some step‐by‐step instructions for publishing reproducible image data processing and analysis workflows. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7849301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78493012021-02-04 Reproducible image handling and analysis Miura, Kota Nørrelykke, Simon F EMBO J Commentary Image data are universal in life sciences research. Their proper handling is not. A significant proportion of image data in research papers show signs of mishandling that undermine their interpretation. We propose that a precise description of the image processing and analysis applied is required to address this problem. A new norm for reporting reproducible image analyses will diminish mishandling, as it will alert co‐authors, referees, and journals to aberrant image data processing or, if published nonetheless, it will document it to the reader. To promote this norm, we discuss the effectiveness of this approach and give some step‐by‐step instructions for publishing reproducible image data processing and analysis workflows. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-01-22 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7849301/ /pubmed/33480052 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Miura, Kota Nørrelykke, Simon F Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title | Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title_full | Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title_fullStr | Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title_short | Reproducible image handling and analysis |
title_sort | reproducible image handling and analysis |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480052 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embj.2020105889 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT miurakota reproducibleimagehandlingandanalysis AT nørrelykkesimonf reproducibleimagehandlingandanalysis |