Cargando…

Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carvalho, Janaína de Pina, de Assis, Tália Machado, Simões, Taynãna César, Cota, Gláucia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020
_version_ 1783645282364293120
author Carvalho, Janaína de Pina
de Assis, Tália Machado
Simões, Taynãna César
Cota, Gláucia
author_facet Carvalho, Janaína de Pina
de Assis, Tália Machado
Simões, Taynãna César
Cota, Gláucia
author_sort Carvalho, Janaína de Pina
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849328
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78493282021-02-03 Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil Carvalho, Janaína de Pina de Assis, Tália Machado Simões, Taynãna César Cota, Gláucia Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Major Article INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7849328/ /pubmed/33533816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
spellingShingle Major Article
Carvalho, Janaína de Pina
de Assis, Tália Machado
Simões, Taynãna César
Cota, Gláucia
Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title_full Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title_fullStr Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title_short Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
title_sort estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in brazil
topic Major Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849328/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533816
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020
work_keys_str_mv AT carvalhojanainadepina estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil
AT deassistaliamachado estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil
AT simoestaynanacesar estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil
AT cotaglaucia estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil