Cargando…
Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil
INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare syste...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020 |
_version_ | 1783645282364293120 |
---|---|
author | Carvalho, Janaína de Pina de Assis, Tália Machado Simões, Taynãna César Cota, Gláucia |
author_facet | Carvalho, Janaína de Pina de Assis, Tália Machado Simões, Taynãna César Cota, Gláucia |
author_sort | Carvalho, Janaína de Pina |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7849328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78493282021-02-03 Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil Carvalho, Janaína de Pina de Assis, Tália Machado Simões, Taynãna César Cota, Gláucia Rev Soc Bras Med Trop Major Article INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis (ML) using three therapeutic approaches in the Brazilian context. METHODS: We performed this economic assessment from the perspective of the Brazilian public healthcare system. The following therapeutic approaches were evaluated: meglumine antimoniate, liposomal amphotericin B, and miltefosine. Direct medical costs were estimated considering four treatment components: a) drug, b) combined medical products, c) procedures, and d) complementary tests. RESULTS: Treatment with meglumine antimoniate had the lowest average cost per patient (US$ 167.66), followed by miltefosine (US$ 259.92) in the outpatient treatment regimen. The average cost of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was US$ 715.35 both in inpatient regimen. In all estimates, the drugs accounted for more than 60% of the total cost for each treatment approach. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate the marked differences in costs between the therapeutic alternatives for ML. In addition to efficacy rates and costs related to adverse events, our data have the potential to support a complete cost-effectiveness study in the future. Complete analyses comparing costs and benefits for interventions will assist health managers in choosing drugs for ML treatment in Brazil as well as in establishing effective public health policies. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical - SBMT 2021-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7849328/ /pubmed/33533816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License |
spellingShingle | Major Article Carvalho, Janaína de Pina de Assis, Tália Machado Simões, Taynãna César Cota, Gláucia Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title | Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title_full | Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title_fullStr | Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title_short | Estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in Brazil |
title_sort | estimating direct costs of the treatment for mucosal leishmaniasis in brazil |
topic | Major Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33533816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0037-8682-0454-2020 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carvalhojanainadepina estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil AT deassistaliamachado estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil AT simoestaynanacesar estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil AT cotaglaucia estimatingdirectcostsofthetreatmentformucosalleishmaniasisinbrazil |