Cargando…

Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients

The development of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in the current and planned clinical trials is essential for the success of a public health response. This paper focuses on how physicians should implement the results of these clinical trials when counseling patients who are pregnant, planning to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chervenak, Frank A., McCullough, Laurence B., Bornstein, Eran, Johnson, Lisa, Katz, Adi, McLeod-Sordjan, Renee, Nimaroff, Michael, Rochelson, Burton L., Tekbali, Asma, Warman, Ashley, Williams, Kim, Grünebaum, Amos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.027
_version_ 1783645298192547840
author Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Bornstein, Eran
Johnson, Lisa
Katz, Adi
McLeod-Sordjan, Renee
Nimaroff, Michael
Rochelson, Burton L.
Tekbali, Asma
Warman, Ashley
Williams, Kim
Grünebaum, Amos
author_facet Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Bornstein, Eran
Johnson, Lisa
Katz, Adi
McLeod-Sordjan, Renee
Nimaroff, Michael
Rochelson, Burton L.
Tekbali, Asma
Warman, Ashley
Williams, Kim
Grünebaum, Amos
author_sort Chervenak, Frank A.
collection PubMed
description The development of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in the current and planned clinical trials is essential for the success of a public health response. This paper focuses on how physicians should implement the results of these clinical trials when counseling patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed about vaccines with government authorization for clinical use. Determining the most effective approach to counsel patients about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination is challenging. We address the professionally responsible counseling of 3 groups of patients—those who are pregnant, those planning to become pregnant, and those breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed. We begin with an evidence-based account of the following 5 major challenges: the limited evidence base, the documented increased risk for severe disease among pregnant coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients, conflicting guidance from government agencies and professional associations, false information about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines, and maternal mistrust and vaccine hesitancy. We subsequently provide evidence-based, ethically justified, practical guidance for meeting these challenges in the professionally responsible counseling of patients about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. To guide the professionally responsible counseling of patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, and breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed, we explain how obstetrician-gynecologists should evaluate the current clinical information, why a recommendation of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination should be made, and how this assessment should be presented to patients during the informed consent process with the goal of empowering them to make informed decisions. We also present a proactive account of how to respond when patients refuse the recommended vaccination, including the elements of the legal obligation of informed refusal and the ethical obligation to ask patients to reconsider. During this process, the physician should be alert to vaccine hesitancy, ask patients to express their hesitation and reasons for it, and respectfully address them. In contrast to the conflicting guidance from government agencies and professional associations, evidence-based professional ethics in obstetrics and gynecology provides unequivocal and clear guidance: Physicians should recommend coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination to patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, and breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed. To prevent widening of the health inequities, build trust in the health benefits of vaccination, and encourage coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine and treatment uptake, in addition to recommending coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations, physicians should engage with communities to tailor strategies to overcome mistrust and deliver evidence-based information, robust educational campaigns, and novel approaches to immunization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78494242021-02-02 Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients Chervenak, Frank A. McCullough, Laurence B. Bornstein, Eran Johnson, Lisa Katz, Adi McLeod-Sordjan, Renee Nimaroff, Michael Rochelson, Burton L. Tekbali, Asma Warman, Ashley Williams, Kim Grünebaum, Amos Am J Obstet Gynecol Clinical Opinion The development of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines in the current and planned clinical trials is essential for the success of a public health response. This paper focuses on how physicians should implement the results of these clinical trials when counseling patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed about vaccines with government authorization for clinical use. Determining the most effective approach to counsel patients about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination is challenging. We address the professionally responsible counseling of 3 groups of patients—those who are pregnant, those planning to become pregnant, and those breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed. We begin with an evidence-based account of the following 5 major challenges: the limited evidence base, the documented increased risk for severe disease among pregnant coronavirus disease 2019-infected patients, conflicting guidance from government agencies and professional associations, false information about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines, and maternal mistrust and vaccine hesitancy. We subsequently provide evidence-based, ethically justified, practical guidance for meeting these challenges in the professionally responsible counseling of patients about coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination. To guide the professionally responsible counseling of patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, and breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed, we explain how obstetrician-gynecologists should evaluate the current clinical information, why a recommendation of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination should be made, and how this assessment should be presented to patients during the informed consent process with the goal of empowering them to make informed decisions. We also present a proactive account of how to respond when patients refuse the recommended vaccination, including the elements of the legal obligation of informed refusal and the ethical obligation to ask patients to reconsider. During this process, the physician should be alert to vaccine hesitancy, ask patients to express their hesitation and reasons for it, and respectfully address them. In contrast to the conflicting guidance from government agencies and professional associations, evidence-based professional ethics in obstetrics and gynecology provides unequivocal and clear guidance: Physicians should recommend coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination to patients who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant, and breastfeeding or planning to breastfeed. To prevent widening of the health inequities, build trust in the health benefits of vaccination, and encourage coronavirus disease 2019 vaccine and treatment uptake, in addition to recommending coronavirus disease 2019 vaccinations, physicians should engage with communities to tailor strategies to overcome mistrust and deliver evidence-based information, robust educational campaigns, and novel approaches to immunization. Elsevier Inc. 2021-05 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7849424/ /pubmed/33539825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.027 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Clinical Opinion
Chervenak, Frank A.
McCullough, Laurence B.
Bornstein, Eran
Johnson, Lisa
Katz, Adi
McLeod-Sordjan, Renee
Nimaroff, Michael
Rochelson, Burton L.
Tekbali, Asma
Warman, Ashley
Williams, Kim
Grünebaum, Amos
Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title_full Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title_fullStr Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title_full_unstemmed Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title_short Professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
title_sort professionally responsible coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination counseling of obstetrical and gynecologic patients
topic Clinical Opinion
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33539825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2021.01.027
work_keys_str_mv AT chervenakfranka professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT mcculloughlaurenceb professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT bornsteineran professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT johnsonlisa professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT katzadi professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT mcleodsordjanrenee professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT nimaroffmichael professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT rochelsonburtonl professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT tekbaliasma professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT warmanashley professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT williamskim professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients
AT grunebaumamos professionallyresponsiblecoronavirusdisease2019vaccinationcounselingofobstetricalandgynecologicpatients