Cargando…

Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients

Background: It is not only important for counseling purposes and for healthcare management. This study investigates the prediction accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach and a linear model. The heuristic expecting 1 day of stay per percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) ser...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elrod, Julia, Mohr, Christoph, Wolff, Ruben, Boettcher, Michael, Reinshagen, Konrad, Bartels, Pia, Koenigs, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.613736
_version_ 1783645304295260160
author Elrod, Julia
Mohr, Christoph
Wolff, Ruben
Boettcher, Michael
Reinshagen, Konrad
Bartels, Pia
Koenigs, Ingo
author_facet Elrod, Julia
Mohr, Christoph
Wolff, Ruben
Boettcher, Michael
Reinshagen, Konrad
Bartels, Pia
Koenigs, Ingo
author_sort Elrod, Julia
collection PubMed
description Background: It is not only important for counseling purposes and for healthcare management. This study investigates the prediction accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach and a linear model. The heuristic expecting 1 day of stay per percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) serves as the performance benchmark. Methods: The study is based on pediatric burn patient's data sets from an international burn registry (N = 8,542). Mean absolute error and standard error are calculated for each prediction model (rule of thumb, linear regression, and random forest). Factors contributing to a prolonged stay and the relationship between TBSA and the residual error are analyzed. Results: The random forest-based approach and the linear model are statistically superior to the rule of thumb (p < 0.001, resp. p = 0.009). The residual error rises as TBSA increases for all methods. Factors associated with a prolonged LOS are particularly TBSA, depth of burn, and inhalation trauma. Conclusion: Applying AI-based algorithms to data from large international registries constitutes a promising tool for the purpose of prediction in medicine in the future; however, certain prerequisites concerning the underlying data sets and certain shortcomings must be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7849450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78494502021-02-02 Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients Elrod, Julia Mohr, Christoph Wolff, Ruben Boettcher, Michael Reinshagen, Konrad Bartels, Pia Koenigs, Ingo Front Pediatr Pediatrics Background: It is not only important for counseling purposes and for healthcare management. This study investigates the prediction accuracy of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based approach and a linear model. The heuristic expecting 1 day of stay per percentage of total body surface area (TBSA) serves as the performance benchmark. Methods: The study is based on pediatric burn patient's data sets from an international burn registry (N = 8,542). Mean absolute error and standard error are calculated for each prediction model (rule of thumb, linear regression, and random forest). Factors contributing to a prolonged stay and the relationship between TBSA and the residual error are analyzed. Results: The random forest-based approach and the linear model are statistically superior to the rule of thumb (p < 0.001, resp. p = 0.009). The residual error rises as TBSA increases for all methods. Factors associated with a prolonged LOS are particularly TBSA, depth of burn, and inhalation trauma. Conclusion: Applying AI-based algorithms to data from large international registries constitutes a promising tool for the purpose of prediction in medicine in the future; however, certain prerequisites concerning the underlying data sets and certain shortcomings must be considered. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7849450/ /pubmed/33537267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.613736 Text en Copyright © 2021 Elrod, Mohr, Wolff, Boettcher, Reinshagen, Bartels, German Burn Registry and Koenigs. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pediatrics
Elrod, Julia
Mohr, Christoph
Wolff, Ruben
Boettcher, Michael
Reinshagen, Konrad
Bartels, Pia
Koenigs, Ingo
Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title_full Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title_fullStr Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title_full_unstemmed Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title_short Using Artificial Intelligence to Obtain More Evidence? Prediction of Length of Hospitalization in Pediatric Burn Patients
title_sort using artificial intelligence to obtain more evidence? prediction of length of hospitalization in pediatric burn patients
topic Pediatrics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33537267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fped.2020.613736
work_keys_str_mv AT elrodjulia usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT mohrchristoph usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT wolffruben usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT boettchermichael usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT reinshagenkonrad usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT bartelspia usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients
AT koenigsingo usingartificialintelligencetoobtainmoreevidencepredictionoflengthofhospitalizationinpediatricburnpatients