Cargando…
Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review
OBJECTIVES: Medical image analysis practices face challenges that can potentially be addressed with algorithm-based segmentation tools. In this study, we map the field of automatic MR brain lesion segmentation to understand the clinical applicability of prevalent methods and study designs, as well a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042660 |
_version_ | 1783645374628495360 |
---|---|
author | Gryska, Emilia Schneiderman, Justin Björkman-Burtscher, Isabella Heckemann, Rolf A |
author_facet | Gryska, Emilia Schneiderman, Justin Björkman-Burtscher, Isabella Heckemann, Rolf A |
author_sort | Gryska, Emilia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Medical image analysis practices face challenges that can potentially be addressed with algorithm-based segmentation tools. In this study, we map the field of automatic MR brain lesion segmentation to understand the clinical applicability of prevalent methods and study designs, as well as challenges and limitations in the field. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Three databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore and Scopus) were searched with tailored queries. Studies were included based on predefined criteria. Emerging themes during consecutive title, abstract, methods and whole-text screening were identified. The full-text analysis focused on materials, preprocessing, performance evaluation and comparison. RESULTS: Out of 2990 unique articles identified through the search, 441 articles met the eligibility criteria, with an estimated growth rate of 10% per year. We present a general overview and trends in the field with regard to publication sources, segmentation principles used and types of lesions. Algorithms are predominantly evaluated by measuring the agreement of segmentation results with a trusted reference. Few articles describe measures of clinical validity. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reporting practices leave room for improvement with a view to studying replication, method comparison and clinical applicability. To promote this improvement, we propose a list of recommendations for future studies in the field. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7849889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78498892021-02-02 Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review Gryska, Emilia Schneiderman, Justin Björkman-Burtscher, Isabella Heckemann, Rolf A BMJ Open Radiology and Imaging OBJECTIVES: Medical image analysis practices face challenges that can potentially be addressed with algorithm-based segmentation tools. In this study, we map the field of automatic MR brain lesion segmentation to understand the clinical applicability of prevalent methods and study designs, as well as challenges and limitations in the field. DESIGN: Scoping review. SETTING: Three databases (PubMed, IEEE Xplore and Scopus) were searched with tailored queries. Studies were included based on predefined criteria. Emerging themes during consecutive title, abstract, methods and whole-text screening were identified. The full-text analysis focused on materials, preprocessing, performance evaluation and comparison. RESULTS: Out of 2990 unique articles identified through the search, 441 articles met the eligibility criteria, with an estimated growth rate of 10% per year. We present a general overview and trends in the field with regard to publication sources, segmentation principles used and types of lesions. Algorithms are predominantly evaluated by measuring the agreement of segmentation results with a trusted reference. Few articles describe measures of clinical validity. CONCLUSIONS: The observed reporting practices leave room for improvement with a view to studying replication, method comparison and clinical applicability. To promote this improvement, we propose a list of recommendations for future studies in the field. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7849889/ /pubmed/33514580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042660 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Radiology and Imaging Gryska, Emilia Schneiderman, Justin Björkman-Burtscher, Isabella Heckemann, Rolf A Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title | Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title_full | Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title_fullStr | Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title_short | Automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
title_sort | automatic brain lesion segmentation on standard magnetic resonance images: a scoping review |
topic | Radiology and Imaging |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7849889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33514580 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042660 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gryskaemilia automaticbrainlesionsegmentationonstandardmagneticresonanceimagesascopingreview AT schneidermanjustin automaticbrainlesionsegmentationonstandardmagneticresonanceimagesascopingreview AT bjorkmanburtscherisabella automaticbrainlesionsegmentationonstandardmagneticresonanceimagesascopingreview AT heckemannrolfa automaticbrainlesionsegmentationonstandardmagneticresonanceimagesascopingreview |