Cargando…

Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?

OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta at an aneurysmal diameter of >55 mm to prevent acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in non-Marfan patients. Several publications have challenged this threshold, suggesting that surgery should be performed in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tozzi, Piergiorgio, Gunga, Ziyad, Niclauss, Lars, Delay, Dominique, Roumy, Aurelian, Pfister, Raymond, Colombier, Sebastien, Patella, Francesco, Qanadli, Salah Dine, Kirsch, Matthias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa351
_version_ 1783645400411930624
author Tozzi, Piergiorgio
Gunga, Ziyad
Niclauss, Lars
Delay, Dominique
Roumy, Aurelian
Pfister, Raymond
Colombier, Sebastien
Patella, Francesco
Qanadli, Salah Dine
Kirsch, Matthias
author_facet Tozzi, Piergiorgio
Gunga, Ziyad
Niclauss, Lars
Delay, Dominique
Roumy, Aurelian
Pfister, Raymond
Colombier, Sebastien
Patella, Francesco
Qanadli, Salah Dine
Kirsch, Matthias
author_sort Tozzi, Piergiorgio
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta at an aneurysmal diameter of >55 mm to prevent acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in non-Marfan patients. Several publications have challenged this threshold, suggesting that surgery should be performed in smaller aneurysms to prevent this devastating disease. We reviewed our experience with measuring aortic size at the time of TAAD to validate the existing recommendation for prophylactic ascending aorta replacement. METHODS: All patients who had been admitted for TAAD to our emergency department from 2014 to 2019 and underwent ascending aorta replacement were included. Marfan patients were excluded. The maximum diameter of the dissected aorta was measured preoperatively using CT scan. We estimated the aortic diameter at the time of dissection to be 7 mm smaller than the measured maximum diameter of the dissected aorta (modelled pre-dissection diameter). RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were included. Of these, 67 were male (65.6%) and 35 were female (34.4%), and the cohort’s mean age was 65 ± 12.1 years. In addition, 66% were treated for arterial hypertension. The mean maximum modelled pre-dissection diameter was 39.6 ± 4.8 mm: 39.1 ± 5.1 mm in men and 40.7 ± 2.8 mm in women (P = 0.1). The cumulative 30-day mortality rate was 19.6% (20/102). CONCLUSIONS: TAAD occurred at a modelled aortic diameter below 45 mm in 87.7% of our patients. Therefore, the current aortic diameter threshold of 55 mm excludes ∼99% of patients with TAAD from prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta warrants reappraisal and this parameter should be a distinct part of a personalized decision-making process that also takes into account age, gender and body surface area to establish the surgical indication for preventive aorta replacement aimed to improve the survival benefit of this procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7850065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78500652021-02-03 Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery? Tozzi, Piergiorgio Gunga, Ziyad Niclauss, Lars Delay, Dominique Roumy, Aurelian Pfister, Raymond Colombier, Sebastien Patella, Francesco Qanadli, Salah Dine Kirsch, Matthias Eur J Cardiothorac Surg Conventional Aortic Surgery OBJECTIVES: Current guidelines recommend prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta at an aneurysmal diameter of >55 mm to prevent acute Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in non-Marfan patients. Several publications have challenged this threshold, suggesting that surgery should be performed in smaller aneurysms to prevent this devastating disease. We reviewed our experience with measuring aortic size at the time of TAAD to validate the existing recommendation for prophylactic ascending aorta replacement. METHODS: All patients who had been admitted for TAAD to our emergency department from 2014 to 2019 and underwent ascending aorta replacement were included. Marfan patients were excluded. The maximum diameter of the dissected aorta was measured preoperatively using CT scan. We estimated the aortic diameter at the time of dissection to be 7 mm smaller than the measured maximum diameter of the dissected aorta (modelled pre-dissection diameter). RESULTS: Overall, 102 patients were included. Of these, 67 were male (65.6%) and 35 were female (34.4%), and the cohort’s mean age was 65 ± 12.1 years. In addition, 66% were treated for arterial hypertension. The mean maximum modelled pre-dissection diameter was 39.6 ± 4.8 mm: 39.1 ± 5.1 mm in men and 40.7 ± 2.8 mm in women (P = 0.1). The cumulative 30-day mortality rate was 19.6% (20/102). CONCLUSIONS: TAAD occurred at a modelled aortic diameter below 45 mm in 87.7% of our patients. Therefore, the current aortic diameter threshold of 55 mm excludes ∼99% of patients with TAAD from prophylactic replacement of the ascending aorta. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta warrants reappraisal and this parameter should be a distinct part of a personalized decision-making process that also takes into account age, gender and body surface area to establish the surgical indication for preventive aorta replacement aimed to improve the survival benefit of this procedure. Oxford University Press 2020-10-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7850065/ /pubmed/33006606 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa351 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Conventional Aortic Surgery
Tozzi, Piergiorgio
Gunga, Ziyad
Niclauss, Lars
Delay, Dominique
Roumy, Aurelian
Pfister, Raymond
Colombier, Sebastien
Patella, Francesco
Qanadli, Salah Dine
Kirsch, Matthias
Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title_full Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title_fullStr Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title_full_unstemmed Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title_short Type A aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
title_sort type a aortic dissection in aneurysms having modelled pre-dissection maximum diameter below 45 mm: should we implement current guidelines to improve the survival benefit of prophylactic surgery?
topic Conventional Aortic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33006606
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezaa351
work_keys_str_mv AT tozzipiergiorgio typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT gungaziyad typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT niclausslars typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT delaydominique typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT roumyaurelian typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT pfisterraymond typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT colombiersebastien typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT patellafrancesco typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT qanadlisalahdine typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery
AT kirschmatthias typeaaorticdissectioninaneurysmshavingmodelledpredissectionmaximumdiameterbelow45mmshouldweimplementcurrentguidelinestoimprovethesurvivalbenefitofprophylacticsurgery