Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yi-Lung, Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung, Gossop, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696
_version_ 1783645429924102144
author Chen, Yi-Lung
Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
Gossop, Michael
author_facet Chen, Yi-Lung
Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
Gossop, Michael
author_sort Chen, Yi-Lung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the Chen ADHD Scale, Chinese versions of the SNAP-IV, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We examined the psychometric properties of Chen ADHD Scale, including test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD. The Chen ADHD Scale demonstrated satisfactory test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.916), internal consistency (alpha = 0.966 to 0.978), a good model fit for a two-factor structure (inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity) and good convergent and divergent validity with SNAP-IV and SDQ. The AUC of Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD was 0.944. The optimal cut-off value of Chen ADHD Scale with impairment requirement for predicting ADHD was 37 with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. CONCLUSION: The Chen ADHD Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for screening ADHD symptoms in clinical settings in Taiwan.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7850380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78503802021-02-02 Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) Chen, Yi-Lung Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung Gossop, Michael Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Methodology PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the Chen ADHD Scale, Chinese versions of the SNAP-IV, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We examined the psychometric properties of Chen ADHD Scale, including test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD. The Chen ADHD Scale demonstrated satisfactory test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.916), internal consistency (alpha = 0.966 to 0.978), a good model fit for a two-factor structure (inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity) and good convergent and divergent validity with SNAP-IV and SDQ. The AUC of Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD was 0.944. The optimal cut-off value of Chen ADHD Scale with impairment requirement for predicting ADHD was 37 with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. CONCLUSION: The Chen ADHD Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for screening ADHD symptoms in clinical settings in Taiwan. Dove 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7850380/ /pubmed/33536756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696 Text en © 2021 Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Methodology
Chen, Yi-Lung
Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung
Gossop, Michael
Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
title_sort reliability and validity of the chen adhd scale (c-adhds)
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536756
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyilung reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds
AT chenvincentchinhung reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds
AT gossopmichael reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds