Cargando…
Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS)
PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696 |
_version_ | 1783645429924102144 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yi-Lung Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung Gossop, Michael |
author_facet | Chen, Yi-Lung Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung Gossop, Michael |
author_sort | Chen, Yi-Lung |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the Chen ADHD Scale, Chinese versions of the SNAP-IV, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We examined the psychometric properties of Chen ADHD Scale, including test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD. The Chen ADHD Scale demonstrated satisfactory test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.916), internal consistency (alpha = 0.966 to 0.978), a good model fit for a two-factor structure (inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity) and good convergent and divergent validity with SNAP-IV and SDQ. The AUC of Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD was 0.944. The optimal cut-off value of Chen ADHD Scale with impairment requirement for predicting ADHD was 37 with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. CONCLUSION: The Chen ADHD Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for screening ADHD symptoms in clinical settings in Taiwan. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7850380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78503802021-02-02 Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) Chen, Yi-Lung Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung Gossop, Michael Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat Methodology PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the Chen ADHD Scale and to examine its reliability and validity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We recruited 114 individuals diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and 39 non-ADHD controls aged between 5 and 18 years. Their parents completed the Chen ADHD Scale, Chinese versions of the SNAP-IV, and Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). We examined the psychometric properties of Chen ADHD Scale, including test–retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity, convergent and divergent validity. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to calculate the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity of the Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD. The Chen ADHD Scale demonstrated satisfactory test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation = 0.916), internal consistency (alpha = 0.966 to 0.978), a good model fit for a two-factor structure (inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity) and good convergent and divergent validity with SNAP-IV and SDQ. The AUC of Chen ADHD Scale for predicting ADHD was 0.944. The optimal cut-off value of Chen ADHD Scale with impairment requirement for predicting ADHD was 37 with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.97. CONCLUSION: The Chen ADHD Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for screening ADHD symptoms in clinical settings in Taiwan. Dove 2021-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7850380/ /pubmed/33536756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696 Text en © 2021 Chen et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php). |
spellingShingle | Methodology Chen, Yi-Lung Chen, Vincent Chin-Hung Gossop, Michael Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title | Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title_full | Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title_fullStr | Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title_short | Reliability and Validity of the Chen ADHD Scale (C-ADHDS) |
title_sort | reliability and validity of the chen adhd scale (c-adhds) |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33536756 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S292696 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyilung reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds AT chenvincentchinhung reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds AT gossopmichael reliabilityandvalidityofthechenadhdscalecadhds |