Cargando…
YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic
Introduction: YouTube is a popular website where public can access and gain information from videos related to COVID-19. This paper seeks to assess the quality and validity of information available on YouTube, based on the current Center for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1837412 |
_version_ | 1783645434118406144 |
---|---|
author | Andika, Reynold Kao, Chien T. Williams, Christopher Lee, Young J. Al-Battah, Hassan Alweis, Richard |
author_facet | Andika, Reynold Kao, Chien T. Williams, Christopher Lee, Young J. Al-Battah, Hassan Alweis, Richard |
author_sort | Andika, Reynold |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: YouTube is a popular website where public can access and gain information from videos related to COVID-19. This paper seeks to assess the quality and validity of information available on YouTube, based on the current Center for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Methods: We identified the 250 most-viewed videos from 1 January 2020 to 12 May 2020 on YouTube using keyword ‘COVID 19’. Two independent reviewers analyzed the English-language videos as useful, misleading, or news updates. Result: After excluding non-English and irrelevant videos, 100 videos were analyzed. Forty-four videos were classified as useful, 33 videos were classified as news updates, and 23 videos were classified as misleading. Independent users had five times increased odds of posting misleading videos (40% vs. 12%, OR = 5.05, 95% CI = 1.84–13.9, P = 0.001), whereas news agencies have 2.8 greater odds of posting useful or update videos (87% vs 44%, OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 0.959–8.45, P = 0.087). Conclusion: YouTube is an increasingly important source of medical information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the videos were useful, however due to the public nature of the platform, misleading information may also be easily disseminated. Independent users are more likely to post-misleading videos. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7850399 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78503992021-02-05 YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic Andika, Reynold Kao, Chien T. Williams, Christopher Lee, Young J. Al-Battah, Hassan Alweis, Richard J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect Brief Report Introduction: YouTube is a popular website where public can access and gain information from videos related to COVID-19. This paper seeks to assess the quality and validity of information available on YouTube, based on the current Center for Disease Control (CDC) and World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. Methods: We identified the 250 most-viewed videos from 1 January 2020 to 12 May 2020 on YouTube using keyword ‘COVID 19’. Two independent reviewers analyzed the English-language videos as useful, misleading, or news updates. Result: After excluding non-English and irrelevant videos, 100 videos were analyzed. Forty-four videos were classified as useful, 33 videos were classified as news updates, and 23 videos were classified as misleading. Independent users had five times increased odds of posting misleading videos (40% vs. 12%, OR = 5.05, 95% CI = 1.84–13.9, P = 0.001), whereas news agencies have 2.8 greater odds of posting useful or update videos (87% vs 44%, OR = 2.85, 95% CI = 0.959–8.45, P = 0.087). Conclusion: YouTube is an increasingly important source of medical information during the COVID-19 pandemic. Most of the videos were useful, however due to the public nature of the platform, misleading information may also be easily disseminated. Independent users are more likely to post-misleading videos. Taylor & Francis 2021-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7850399/ /pubmed/33552412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1837412 Text en © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group on behalf of Greater Baltimore Medical Center. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Andika, Reynold Kao, Chien T. Williams, Christopher Lee, Young J. Al-Battah, Hassan Alweis, Richard YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | YouTube as a source of information on the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | youtube as a source of information on the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850399/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20009666.2020.1837412 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andikareynold youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic AT kaochient youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic AT williamschristopher youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic AT leeyoungj youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic AT albattahhassan youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic AT alweisrichard youtubeasasourceofinformationonthecovid19pandemic |