Cargando…
Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies
Previous field and laboratory studies investigating airborne Burkholderia pseudomallei have used a variety of different aerosol samplers to detect and quantify concentrations of the bacteria in aerosols. However, the performance of aerosol samplers can vary in their ability to preserve the viability...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33524051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009001 |
_version_ | 1783645452077367296 |
---|---|
author | Schuit, Michael Gardner, Sierra Taylor, Jill Dabisch, Paul |
author_facet | Schuit, Michael Gardner, Sierra Taylor, Jill Dabisch, Paul |
author_sort | Schuit, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | Previous field and laboratory studies investigating airborne Burkholderia pseudomallei have used a variety of different aerosol samplers to detect and quantify concentrations of the bacteria in aerosols. However, the performance of aerosol samplers can vary in their ability to preserve the viability of collected microorganisms, depending on the resistance of the organisms to impaction, desiccation, or other stresses associated with the sampling process. Consequently, sampler selection is critical to maximizing the probability of detecting viable microorganisms in collected air samples in field studies and for accurate determination of aerosol concentrations in laboratory studies. To inform such decisions, the present study assessed the performance of four laboratory aerosol samplers, specifically the all-glass impinger (AGI), gelatin filter, midget impinger, and Mercer cascade impactor, for collecting aerosols containing B. pseudomallei generated from suspensions in two types of culture media. The results suggest that the relative performance of the sampling devices is dependent on the suspension medium utilized for aerosolization. Performance across the four samplers was similar for aerosols generated from suspensions supplemented with 4% glycerol. However, for aerosols generated from suspensions without glycerol, use of the filter sampler or an impactor resulted in significantly lower estimates of the viable aerosol concentration than those obtained with either the AGI or midget impinger. These results demonstrate that sampler selection has the potential to affect estimation of doses in inhalational animal models of melioidosis, as well as the likelihood of detection of viable B. pseudomallei in the environment, and will be useful to inform design of future laboratory and field studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7850477 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78504772021-02-09 Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies Schuit, Michael Gardner, Sierra Taylor, Jill Dabisch, Paul PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article Previous field and laboratory studies investigating airborne Burkholderia pseudomallei have used a variety of different aerosol samplers to detect and quantify concentrations of the bacteria in aerosols. However, the performance of aerosol samplers can vary in their ability to preserve the viability of collected microorganisms, depending on the resistance of the organisms to impaction, desiccation, or other stresses associated with the sampling process. Consequently, sampler selection is critical to maximizing the probability of detecting viable microorganisms in collected air samples in field studies and for accurate determination of aerosol concentrations in laboratory studies. To inform such decisions, the present study assessed the performance of four laboratory aerosol samplers, specifically the all-glass impinger (AGI), gelatin filter, midget impinger, and Mercer cascade impactor, for collecting aerosols containing B. pseudomallei generated from suspensions in two types of culture media. The results suggest that the relative performance of the sampling devices is dependent on the suspension medium utilized for aerosolization. Performance across the four samplers was similar for aerosols generated from suspensions supplemented with 4% glycerol. However, for aerosols generated from suspensions without glycerol, use of the filter sampler or an impactor resulted in significantly lower estimates of the viable aerosol concentration than those obtained with either the AGI or midget impinger. These results demonstrate that sampler selection has the potential to affect estimation of doses in inhalational animal models of melioidosis, as well as the likelihood of detection of viable B. pseudomallei in the environment, and will be useful to inform design of future laboratory and field studies. Public Library of Science 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7850477/ /pubmed/33524051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009001 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Schuit, Michael Gardner, Sierra Taylor, Jill Dabisch, Paul Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title | Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title_full | Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title_short | Evaluation of four sampling devices for Burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
title_sort | evaluation of four sampling devices for burkholderia pseudomallei laboratory aerosol studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850477/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33524051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schuitmichael evaluationoffoursamplingdevicesforburkholderiapseudomalleilaboratoryaerosolstudies AT gardnersierra evaluationoffoursamplingdevicesforburkholderiapseudomalleilaboratoryaerosolstudies AT taylorjill evaluationoffoursamplingdevicesforburkholderiapseudomalleilaboratoryaerosolstudies AT dabischpaul evaluationoffoursamplingdevicesforburkholderiapseudomalleilaboratoryaerosolstudies |