Cargando…
Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study)
Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagula...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714739 |
_version_ | 1783645530594738176 |
---|---|
author | Picker, Nils Lee, Agnes Y. Cohen, Alexander T. Maraveyas, Anthony Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Abdelgawwad, Khaled Fatoba, Samuel Thate-Waschke, Inga-Marion Bach, Miriam Wilke, Thomas |
author_facet | Picker, Nils Lee, Agnes Y. Cohen, Alexander T. Maraveyas, Anthony Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Abdelgawwad, Khaled Fatoba, Samuel Thate-Waschke, Inga-Marion Bach, Miriam Wilke, Thomas |
author_sort | Picker, Nils |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. Methods Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. Results Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. “Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks” showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). Conclusion This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by “route of administration,” with patients strongly preferring oral administration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7850882 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78508822021-02-03 Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) Picker, Nils Lee, Agnes Y. Cohen, Alexander T. Maraveyas, Anthony Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Abdelgawwad, Khaled Fatoba, Samuel Thate-Waschke, Inga-Marion Bach, Miriam Wilke, Thomas Thromb Haemost Introduction Clinical guidelines recommend anticoagulation therapy for the treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (VTE), but little is known about preferences. Therefore, the objective of this discrete choice experiment (DCE) was to elucidate patient preferences regarding anticoagulation convenience attributes. Methods Adult patients with cancer-associated VTE who switched to direct oral anticoagulants were included in a single-arm study (COSIMO). Patients were asked to decide between hypothetical treatment options based on a combination of the following attributes: route of administration (injection/tablet), frequency of intake (once/twice daily), need for regular controls of the international normalized ratio (INR) at least every 3 to 4 weeks (yes/no), interactions with food/alcohol (yes/no), and distance to treating physician (1 vs. 20 km) as an additional neutral attribute. DCE data were collected by structured telephone interviews and analyzed based on a conditional logit regression. Results Overall, 163 patients (mean age 63.7 years, 49.1% female) were included. They strongly preferred oral administration compared with self-injections (importance of this attribute for overall treatment decisions: 73.8%), and a treatment without dietary restrictions (11.8%). Even if these attributes were less important (7.2% and 6.5%, respectively), patients indicated a preference for a shorter distance to the treating physician and once-daily dosing compared with twice-daily intake. “Need for regular controls of INR at least every 3 to 4 weeks” showed no significant impact on the treatment decision (0.7%). Conclusion This study showed that treatment-related decision making in cancer-associated VTE, assuming comparable effectiveness and safety of anticoagulant treatments, is predominantly driven by “route of administration,” with patients strongly preferring oral administration. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-02 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7850882/ /pubmed/32877956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714739 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Picker, Nils Lee, Agnes Y. Cohen, Alexander T. Maraveyas, Anthony Beyer-Westendorf, Jan Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Abdelgawwad, Khaled Fatoba, Samuel Thate-Waschke, Inga-Marion Bach, Miriam Wilke, Thomas Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title | Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title_full | Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title_fullStr | Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title_full_unstemmed | Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title_short | Anticoagulation Treatment in Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism: Assessment of Patient Preferences Using a Discrete Choice Experiment (COSIMO Study) |
title_sort | anticoagulation treatment in cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: assessment of patient preferences using a discrete choice experiment (cosimo study) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7850882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32877956 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1714739 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pickernils anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT leeagnesy anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT cohenalexandert anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT maraveyasanthony anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT beyerwestendorfjan anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT mantovanilorenzog anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT abdelgawwadkhaled anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT fatobasamuel anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT thatewaschkeingamarion anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT bachmiriam anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy AT wilkethomas anticoagulationtreatmentincancerassociatedvenousthromboembolismassessmentofpatientpreferencesusingadiscretechoiceexperimentcosimostudy |