Cargando…

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment

PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) are a major concern after acute survival from trauma. Variations in treatment protocols for trauma patients exist worldwide. This study analyzes the differences in the number of VTE events and the associated complications of thromboprophylaxis between two level...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gunning, Amy C., Maier, Ronald V., de Rooij, Doret, Leenen, Luke P. H., Hietbrink, Falco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01208-z
_version_ 1783645560128929792
author Gunning, Amy C.
Maier, Ronald V.
de Rooij, Doret
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
author_facet Gunning, Amy C.
Maier, Ronald V.
de Rooij, Doret
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
author_sort Gunning, Amy C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) are a major concern after acute survival from trauma. Variations in treatment protocols for trauma patients exist worldwide. This study analyzes the differences in the number of VTE events and the associated complications of thromboprophylaxis between two level I trauma populations utilizing varying treatment protocols. METHODS: International multicenter trauma registry-based study was performed at the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) in The Netherlands (early commencement chemical prophylaxis), and Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in the United States (restrictive early chemical prophylaxis). All severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16), aged ≥ 18 years, and admitted in 2013 were included. Primary outcomes were VTE [deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (no screening), pulmonary embolism (PE)], and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: In UMCU, 279 patients were included and in HMC, 974 patients. Overall, 75% of the admitted trauma patients in UMCU and 81% in HMC (p < 0.001) received thromboprophylaxis, of which 100% in and 75% at, respectively, UMCU and HMC consisted of chemical prophylaxis. From these patients, 72% at UMCU and 47% at HMC (p < 0.001) were treated within 48 h after arrival. At UMCU, 4 patients (1.4%) (PE = 3, DVT = 1) and HMC 37 patients (3.8%) (PE = 22, DVT = 16; p = 0.06) developed a VTE. At UMCU, a greater percent of patients with VTE had traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Most VTE occurred despite adequate prophylaxis being given (75% UMCU and 81% HMC). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in, respectively, 4 (1.4%) and 10 (1%) patients in UMCU and HMC (p = 0.570). After adjustment for age, ISS, HLOS, and injury type, no significant difference was demonstrated in UMCU compared to HMC for the development of VTE, OR 2.397, p = 0.102 and hemorrhagic complications, OR 0. 586, p = 0.383. CONCLUSIONS: A more early commencement protocol resulted in almost twice as much chemical prophylaxis being started within the first 48 h in comparison with a more delayed initiation of treatment. Interestingly, most episodes of VTE developed while receiving recommended prophylaxis. Early chemical thromboprophylaxis did not significantly increase the bleeding complications and it appears to be safe to start early.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78510352021-02-08 Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment Gunning, Amy C. Maier, Ronald V. de Rooij, Doret Leenen, Luke P. H. Hietbrink, Falco Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: Venous thromboembolisms (VTE) are a major concern after acute survival from trauma. Variations in treatment protocols for trauma patients exist worldwide. This study analyzes the differences in the number of VTE events and the associated complications of thromboprophylaxis between two level I trauma populations utilizing varying treatment protocols. METHODS: International multicenter trauma registry-based study was performed at the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU) in The Netherlands (early commencement chemical prophylaxis), and Harborview Medical Center (HMC) in the United States (restrictive early chemical prophylaxis). All severely injured patients (ISS ≥ 16), aged ≥ 18 years, and admitted in 2013 were included. Primary outcomes were VTE [deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (no screening), pulmonary embolism (PE)], and hemorrhagic complications. RESULTS: In UMCU, 279 patients were included and in HMC, 974 patients. Overall, 75% of the admitted trauma patients in UMCU and 81% in HMC (p < 0.001) received thromboprophylaxis, of which 100% in and 75% at, respectively, UMCU and HMC consisted of chemical prophylaxis. From these patients, 72% at UMCU and 47% at HMC (p < 0.001) were treated within 48 h after arrival. At UMCU, 4 patients (1.4%) (PE = 3, DVT = 1) and HMC 37 patients (3.8%) (PE = 22, DVT = 16; p = 0.06) developed a VTE. At UMCU, a greater percent of patients with VTE had traumatic brain injuries (TBI). Most VTE occurred despite adequate prophylaxis being given (75% UMCU and 81% HMC). Hemorrhagic complications occurred in, respectively, 4 (1.4%) and 10 (1%) patients in UMCU and HMC (p = 0.570). After adjustment for age, ISS, HLOS, and injury type, no significant difference was demonstrated in UMCU compared to HMC for the development of VTE, OR 2.397, p = 0.102 and hemorrhagic complications, OR 0. 586, p = 0.383. CONCLUSIONS: A more early commencement protocol resulted in almost twice as much chemical prophylaxis being started within the first 48 h in comparison with a more delayed initiation of treatment. Interestingly, most episodes of VTE developed while receiving recommended prophylaxis. Early chemical thromboprophylaxis did not significantly increase the bleeding complications and it appears to be safe to start early. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-08-30 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7851035/ /pubmed/31471670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01208-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Gunning, Amy C.
Maier, Ronald V.
de Rooij, Doret
Leenen, Luke P. H.
Hietbrink, Falco
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title_full Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title_fullStr Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title_full_unstemmed Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title_short Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
title_sort venous thromboembolism (vte) prophylaxis in severely injured patients: an international comparative assessment
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31471670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-019-01208-z
work_keys_str_mv AT gunningamyc venousthromboembolismvteprophylaxisinseverelyinjuredpatientsaninternationalcomparativeassessment
AT maierronaldv venousthromboembolismvteprophylaxisinseverelyinjuredpatientsaninternationalcomparativeassessment
AT derooijdoret venousthromboembolismvteprophylaxisinseverelyinjuredpatientsaninternationalcomparativeassessment
AT leenenlukeph venousthromboembolismvteprophylaxisinseverelyinjuredpatientsaninternationalcomparativeassessment
AT hietbrinkfalco venousthromboembolismvteprophylaxisinseverelyinjuredpatientsaninternationalcomparativeassessment