Cargando…
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves respo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33154570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9 |
_version_ | 1783645587127664640 |
---|---|
author | Heinemann, Volker von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer Decker, Thomas Kiani, Alexander Kaiser, Florian Al-Batran, Salah-Edin Heintges, Tobias Lerchenmüller, Christoph Kahl, Christoph Seipelt, Gernot Kullmann, Frank Moehler, Markus Scheithauer, Werner Held, Swantje Miller-Phillips, Lisa Modest, Dominik Paul Jung, Andreas Kirchner, Thomas Stintzing, Sebastian |
author_facet | Heinemann, Volker von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer Decker, Thomas Kiani, Alexander Kaiser, Florian Al-Batran, Salah-Edin Heintges, Tobias Lerchenmüller, Christoph Kahl, Christoph Seipelt, Gernot Kullmann, Frank Moehler, Markus Scheithauer, Werner Held, Swantje Miller-Phillips, Lisa Modest, Dominik Paul Jung, Andreas Kirchner, Thomas Stintzing, Sebastian |
author_sort | Heinemann, Volker |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes. METHODS: The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00433927. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7851157 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78511572021-02-08 FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial Heinemann, Volker von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer Decker, Thomas Kiani, Alexander Kaiser, Florian Al-Batran, Salah-Edin Heintges, Tobias Lerchenmüller, Christoph Kahl, Christoph Seipelt, Gernot Kullmann, Frank Moehler, Markus Scheithauer, Werner Held, Swantje Miller-Phillips, Lisa Modest, Dominik Paul Jung, Andreas Kirchner, Thomas Stintzing, Sebastian Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes. METHODS: The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated. RESULTS: Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT00433927. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-11-06 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7851157/ /pubmed/33154570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Heinemann, Volker von Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer Decker, Thomas Kiani, Alexander Kaiser, Florian Al-Batran, Salah-Edin Heintges, Tobias Lerchenmüller, Christoph Kahl, Christoph Seipelt, Gernot Kullmann, Frank Moehler, Markus Scheithauer, Werner Held, Swantje Miller-Phillips, Lisa Modest, Dominik Paul Jung, Andreas Kirchner, Thomas Stintzing, Sebastian FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title_full | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title_fullStr | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title_full_unstemmed | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title_short | FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial |
title_sort | folfiri plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of fire-3, a randomised clinical trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851157/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33154570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heinemannvolker folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT vonweikersthalludwigfischer folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT deckerthomas folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kianialexander folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kaiserflorian folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT albatransalahedin folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT heintgestobias folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT lerchenmullerchristoph folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kahlchristoph folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT seipeltgernot folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kullmannfrank folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT moehlermarkus folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT scheithauerwerner folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT heldswantje folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT millerphillipslisa folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT modestdominikpaul folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT jungandreas folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT kirchnerthomas folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial AT stintzingsebastian folfiripluscetuximaborbevacizumabforadvancedcolorectalcancerfinalsurvivalandperprotocolanalysisoffire3arandomisedclinicaltrial |