Cargando…

Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: The Phase 2 SCALOP trial compared gemcitabine with capecitabine-based consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Thirty-five systematically identified circulating biomarkers were analysed in plasma samples from 60 patients enroled in SCAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willenbrock, Frances, Cox, Catrin M., Parkes, Eileen E., Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S., Abraham, Aswin G., Owens, Robert, Sabbagh, Ahmad, Jones, Christopher M., Hughes, Daniel L. I., Maughan, Tim, Hurt, Christopher N., O’Neill, Eric E., Mukherjee, Somnath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01120-z
_version_ 1783645618308120576
author Willenbrock, Frances
Cox, Catrin M.
Parkes, Eileen E.
Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S.
Abraham, Aswin G.
Owens, Robert
Sabbagh, Ahmad
Jones, Christopher M.
Hughes, Daniel L. I.
Maughan, Tim
Hurt, Christopher N.
O’Neill, Eric E.
Mukherjee, Somnath
author_facet Willenbrock, Frances
Cox, Catrin M.
Parkes, Eileen E.
Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S.
Abraham, Aswin G.
Owens, Robert
Sabbagh, Ahmad
Jones, Christopher M.
Hughes, Daniel L. I.
Maughan, Tim
Hurt, Christopher N.
O’Neill, Eric E.
Mukherjee, Somnath
author_sort Willenbrock, Frances
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Phase 2 SCALOP trial compared gemcitabine with capecitabine-based consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Thirty-five systematically identified circulating biomarkers were analysed in plasma samples from 60 patients enroled in SCALOP. Each was measured in triplicate at baseline (prior to three cycles of gemcitabine-capecitabine induction chemotherapy) and, for a subset, prior to CRT. Association with overall survival (OS) was determined using univariable Cox regression and optimal thresholds delineating low to high values identified using time-dependent ROC curves. Independence from known prognostic factors was assessed using Spearman correlation and the Wilcoxon rank sum test prior to multivariable Cox regression modelling including independent biomarkers and known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Baseline circulating levels of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) were significantly associated with OS, independent of other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with low circulating CCL5 (CCL5(low)) had a median OS of 18.5 (95% CI 11.76–21.32) months compared to 11.3 (95% CI 9.86–15.51) months in CCL5(high); hazard ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.04–8.65; p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: CCL5 is an independent prognostic biomarker in LAPC. Given the known role of CCL5 in tumour invasion, metastasis and the induction of an immunosuppressive micro-environment, targeting of CCL5-mediated pathways may offer therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SCALOP trial was registered with ISRCTN, number 96169987 (registered 29 May 2008).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78513942021-10-26 Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer Willenbrock, Frances Cox, Catrin M. Parkes, Eileen E. Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S. Abraham, Aswin G. Owens, Robert Sabbagh, Ahmad Jones, Christopher M. Hughes, Daniel L. I. Maughan, Tim Hurt, Christopher N. O’Neill, Eric E. Mukherjee, Somnath Br J Cancer Article BACKGROUND: The Phase 2 SCALOP trial compared gemcitabine with capecitabine-based consolidation chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). METHODS: Thirty-five systematically identified circulating biomarkers were analysed in plasma samples from 60 patients enroled in SCALOP. Each was measured in triplicate at baseline (prior to three cycles of gemcitabine-capecitabine induction chemotherapy) and, for a subset, prior to CRT. Association with overall survival (OS) was determined using univariable Cox regression and optimal thresholds delineating low to high values identified using time-dependent ROC curves. Independence from known prognostic factors was assessed using Spearman correlation and the Wilcoxon rank sum test prior to multivariable Cox regression modelling including independent biomarkers and known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Baseline circulating levels of C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) were significantly associated with OS, independent of other clinicopathological characteristics. Patients with low circulating CCL5 (CCL5(low)) had a median OS of 18.5 (95% CI 11.76–21.32) months compared to 11.3 (95% CI 9.86–15.51) months in CCL5(high); hazard ratio 1.95 (95% CI 1.04–8.65; p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: CCL5 is an independent prognostic biomarker in LAPC. Given the known role of CCL5 in tumour invasion, metastasis and the induction of an immunosuppressive micro-environment, targeting of CCL5-mediated pathways may offer therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The SCALOP trial was registered with ISRCTN, number 96169987 (registered 29 May 2008). Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-10-26 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7851394/ /pubmed/33100327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01120-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Cancer Research UK 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Note This work is published under the standard license to publish agreement. After 12 months the work will become freely available and the license terms will switch to a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).
spellingShingle Article
Willenbrock, Frances
Cox, Catrin M.
Parkes, Eileen E.
Wilhelm-Benartzi, Charlotte S.
Abraham, Aswin G.
Owens, Robert
Sabbagh, Ahmad
Jones, Christopher M.
Hughes, Daniel L. I.
Maughan, Tim
Hurt, Christopher N.
O’Neill, Eric E.
Mukherjee, Somnath
Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title_full Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title_fullStr Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title_full_unstemmed Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title_short Circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
title_sort circulating biomarkers and outcomes from a randomised phase 2 trial of gemcitabine versus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy for pancreatic cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33100327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41416-020-01120-z
work_keys_str_mv AT willenbrockfrances circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT coxcatrinm circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT parkeseileene circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT wilhelmbenartzicharlottes circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT abrahamaswing circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT owensrobert circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT sabbaghahmad circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT joneschristopherm circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT hughesdanielli circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT maughantim circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT hurtchristophern circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT oneillerice circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer
AT mukherjeesomnath circulatingbiomarkersandoutcomesfromarandomisedphase2trialofgemcitabineversuscapecitabinebasedchemoradiotherapyforpancreaticcancer