Cargando…

Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer

Tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, reported in vitro, might pose a problem for patients who receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and subsequently receive radiotherapy after surgery. Previous studies suggested that DNA damage repair or cell cycle genes are involved, and could therefore be targeted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Post, Annemarie E. M., Bussink, Johan, Sweep, Fred C. G. J., Span, Paul N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cognizant Communication Corporation 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15555794826018
_version_ 1783645649482285056
author Post, Annemarie E. M.
Bussink, Johan
Sweep, Fred C. G. J.
Span, Paul N.
author_facet Post, Annemarie E. M.
Bussink, Johan
Sweep, Fred C. G. J.
Span, Paul N.
author_sort Post, Annemarie E. M.
collection PubMed
description Tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, reported in vitro, might pose a problem for patients who receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and subsequently receive radiotherapy after surgery. Previous studies suggested that DNA damage repair or cell cycle genes are involved, and could therefore be targeted to preclude the occurrence of cross-resistance. We aimed to characterize the observed cross-resistance by investigating gene expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells that were cultured to tamoxifen resistance. RNA sequencing was performed, and expression of genes characteristic for several DNA damage repair pathways was investigated, as well as expression of genes involved in different phases of the cell cycle. The association of differentially expressed genes with outcome after radiotherapy was assessed in silico in a large breast cancer cohort. None of the DNA damage repair pathways showed differential gene expression in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Two DNA damage repair genes were more than two times upregulated (NEIL1 and EME2), and three DNA damage repair genes were more than two times downregulated (PCNA, BRIP1, and BARD1). However, these were not associated with outcome after radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort. Genes involved in G(1), G(1)/S, G(2), and G(2)/M phases were lower expressed in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Individual genes that were more than two times upregulated (MAPK13) or downregulated (E2F2, CKS2, GINS2, PCNA, MCM5, and EIF5A2) were not associated with response to radiotherapy in the patient cohort investigated. We assessed the expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Though several genes in both pathways were differentially expressed, these could not explain the cross-resistance for irradiation in these cells, since no association to response to radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cognizant Communication Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78515272021-02-16 Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer Post, Annemarie E. M. Bussink, Johan Sweep, Fred C. G. J. Span, Paul N. Oncol Res Article Tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, reported in vitro, might pose a problem for patients who receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and subsequently receive radiotherapy after surgery. Previous studies suggested that DNA damage repair or cell cycle genes are involved, and could therefore be targeted to preclude the occurrence of cross-resistance. We aimed to characterize the observed cross-resistance by investigating gene expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells that were cultured to tamoxifen resistance. RNA sequencing was performed, and expression of genes characteristic for several DNA damage repair pathways was investigated, as well as expression of genes involved in different phases of the cell cycle. The association of differentially expressed genes with outcome after radiotherapy was assessed in silico in a large breast cancer cohort. None of the DNA damage repair pathways showed differential gene expression in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Two DNA damage repair genes were more than two times upregulated (NEIL1 and EME2), and three DNA damage repair genes were more than two times downregulated (PCNA, BRIP1, and BARD1). However, these were not associated with outcome after radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort. Genes involved in G(1), G(1)/S, G(2), and G(2)/M phases were lower expressed in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Individual genes that were more than two times upregulated (MAPK13) or downregulated (E2F2, CKS2, GINS2, PCNA, MCM5, and EIF5A2) were not associated with response to radiotherapy in the patient cohort investigated. We assessed the expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Though several genes in both pathways were differentially expressed, these could not explain the cross-resistance for irradiation in these cells, since no association to response to radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort was found. Cognizant Communication Corporation 2020-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7851527/ /pubmed/31046897 http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15555794826018 Text en Copyright © 2020 Cognizant, LLC. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Post, Annemarie E. M.
Bussink, Johan
Sweep, Fred C. G. J.
Span, Paul N.
Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title_full Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title_short Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer
title_sort changes in dna damage repair gene expression and cell cycle gene expression do not explain radioresistance in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31046897
http://dx.doi.org/10.3727/096504019X15555794826018
work_keys_str_mv AT postannemarieem changesindnadamagerepairgeneexpressionandcellcyclegeneexpressiondonotexplainradioresistanceintamoxifenresistantbreastcancer
AT bussinkjohan changesindnadamagerepairgeneexpressionandcellcyclegeneexpressiondonotexplainradioresistanceintamoxifenresistantbreastcancer
AT sweepfredcgj changesindnadamagerepairgeneexpressionandcellcyclegeneexpressiondonotexplainradioresistanceintamoxifenresistantbreastcancer
AT spanpauln changesindnadamagerepairgeneexpressionandcellcyclegeneexpressiondonotexplainradioresistanceintamoxifenresistantbreastcancer