Cargando…

Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to review the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lemafulin. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review using the search terms of lefamulin and BC-3781 in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We also cross-referenced the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel, Julien, Daniel, Kelly, Alandra, Lindsay, Taylor, Lazaridis, Dovena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Healthcare 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00378-3
_version_ 1783645668624039936
author Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel
Julien, Daniel
Kelly, Alandra
Lindsay, Taylor
Lazaridis, Dovena
author_facet Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel
Julien, Daniel
Kelly, Alandra
Lindsay, Taylor
Lazaridis, Dovena
author_sort Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to review the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lemafulin. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review using the search terms of lefamulin and BC-3781 in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We also cross-referenced the pertinent articles and searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing and nonpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Published data from 2005 to 2019 evaluating the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety studies of lefamulin were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: In phase 3 clinical trials, two multicenter, randomized double-blinded studies—Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia 1 and 2 (LEAP 1 and 2)—compared the efficacy and safety of lemafulin with moxifloxacin in patients diagnosed with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Lemafulin given in doses of 600 mg orally or 150 mg intravenously were reported to have comparable efficacy to those of moxifloxacin with or without linezolid in patients with CABP. After the trial, the lefamulin group had an early clinical response (ECR) of 87.3% and the moxifloxacin group had an ECR of 90.2%. The difference of − 2.9% in the ECR was non-significant (CI − 8.5, 2.8). RELEVANCE TO PATIENTS AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lemafulin exhibits a unique binding property; therefore, it possess a potentially lower predisposition for the development of bacterial resistance and cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes. Lefamulin is active against gram-positive including methicillin-resistant strains and atypical organisms which are often implicated in CABP. Lefamulin may be a safe alternative for adult patients with CABP who may not be candidates for respiratory fluoroquinolones. Lefamulin demonstrates both bactericidal and bacteriostatic activity against gram-positive, fastidious gram-negatives, atypical pathogens, and some gram-negative anaerobes. It is bactericidal in vitro against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (including macrolide-resistant strains) at concentrations of 0.06, 0.5, and 0.008 µg/ml respectively, and bacteriostatic against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. The agent also demonstrates both time- and concentration-dependent killing against the pathogens S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. In vitro susceptibility testing demonstrated an MIC(50/90) of 0.06/0.12 µg/ml against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program found that at a concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml, lefamulin inhibited 100% S. pneumoniae isolates, 99.8% of S. aureus isolates, and 99.6% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates. It was not affected by resistance to various antibiotic classes such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, or macrolides.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78516342021-02-02 Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel Julien, Daniel Kelly, Alandra Lindsay, Taylor Lazaridis, Dovena Infect Dis Ther Review OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article is to review the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lemafulin. DATA SOURCES: We performed a systematic literature review using the search terms of lefamulin and BC-3781 in the PubMed and EMBASE databases. We also cross-referenced the pertinent articles and searched ClinicalTrials.gov to identify ongoing and nonpublished studies. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Published data from 2005 to 2019 evaluating the clinical pharmacology, efficacy, and safety studies of lefamulin were analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: In phase 3 clinical trials, two multicenter, randomized double-blinded studies—Lefamulin Evaluation Against Pneumonia 1 and 2 (LEAP 1 and 2)—compared the efficacy and safety of lemafulin with moxifloxacin in patients diagnosed with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). Lemafulin given in doses of 600 mg orally or 150 mg intravenously were reported to have comparable efficacy to those of moxifloxacin with or without linezolid in patients with CABP. After the trial, the lefamulin group had an early clinical response (ECR) of 87.3% and the moxifloxacin group had an ECR of 90.2%. The difference of − 2.9% in the ECR was non-significant (CI − 8.5, 2.8). RELEVANCE TO PATIENTS AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: Lemafulin exhibits a unique binding property; therefore, it possess a potentially lower predisposition for the development of bacterial resistance and cross-resistance to other antimicrobial classes. Lefamulin is active against gram-positive including methicillin-resistant strains and atypical organisms which are often implicated in CABP. Lefamulin may be a safe alternative for adult patients with CABP who may not be candidates for respiratory fluoroquinolones. Lefamulin demonstrates both bactericidal and bacteriostatic activity against gram-positive, fastidious gram-negatives, atypical pathogens, and some gram-negative anaerobes. It is bactericidal in vitro against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (including macrolide-resistant strains) at concentrations of 0.06, 0.5, and 0.008 µg/ml respectively, and bacteriostatic against Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. The agent also demonstrates both time- and concentration-dependent killing against the pathogens S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. In vitro susceptibility testing demonstrated an MIC(50/90) of 0.06/0.12 µg/ml against S. pneumoniae and S. aureus. The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program found that at a concentration ≤ 1 µg/ml, lefamulin inhibited 100% S. pneumoniae isolates, 99.8% of S. aureus isolates, and 99.6% of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates. It was not affected by resistance to various antibiotic classes such as beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, or macrolides. Springer Healthcare 2021-02-02 2021-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7851634/ /pubmed/33528794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00378-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Eraikhuemen, Nathaniel
Julien, Daniel
Kelly, Alandra
Lindsay, Taylor
Lazaridis, Dovena
Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title_full Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title_fullStr Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title_full_unstemmed Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title_short Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A Focus on Lefamulin
title_sort treatment of community-acquired pneumonia: a focus on lefamulin
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33528794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40121-020-00378-3
work_keys_str_mv AT eraikhuemennathaniel treatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaafocusonlefamulin
AT juliendaniel treatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaafocusonlefamulin
AT kellyalandra treatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaafocusonlefamulin
AT lindsaytaylor treatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaafocusonlefamulin
AT lazaridisdovena treatmentofcommunityacquiredpneumoniaafocusonlefamulin