Cargando…

Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019

IMPORTANCE: Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and postmarketing trials of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i demonstrated that these medications improve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McCoy, Rozalina G., Van Houten, Holly K., Deng, Yihong, Mandic, Pinar Karaca, Ross, Joseph S., Montori, Victor M., Shah, Nilay D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Medical Association 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33523188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792
_version_ 1783645682314248192
author McCoy, Rozalina G.
Van Houten, Holly K.
Deng, Yihong
Mandic, Pinar Karaca
Ross, Joseph S.
Montori, Victor M.
Shah, Nilay D.
author_facet McCoy, Rozalina G.
Van Houten, Holly K.
Deng, Yihong
Mandic, Pinar Karaca
Ross, Joseph S.
Montori, Victor M.
Shah, Nilay D.
author_sort McCoy, Rozalina G.
collection PubMed
description IMPORTANCE: Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and postmarketing trials of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i demonstrated that these medications improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in initiation of treatment with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i by older adults with type 2 diabetes insured by Medicare Advantage vs commercial health plans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Adults aged 58 to 66 years with type 2 diabetes who filled any medication prescription to lower glucose levels from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were compared between groups. EXPOSURE: Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage or commercial health insurance plan. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The odds of initiating GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment were examined for Medicare Advantage vs commercial insurance beneficiaries using 3 separate logistic regression models adjusted for year and demographic and clinical factors. These models were used to calculate adjusted annual rates of medication initiation by health plan. RESULTS: A total of 382 574 adults with pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes (52.9% men; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [2.7] years) were identified, including 172 180 Medicare Advantage and 210 394 commercial beneficiaries. From 2016 to 2019, adjusted rates of initiation of GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment increased among all beneficiaries, from 2.14% to 20.02% for GLP-1RA among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.50% to 11.44% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; from 2.74% to 18.15% for SGLT2i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.57% to 8.51% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; and from 3.30% to 11.71% for DPP-4i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 2.44% to 7.68% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Initiation rates for all 3 drug classes were consistently lower among Medicare Advantage than among commercial insurance beneficiaries. Within each calendar year, the odds of initiating GLP-1RA treatment ranged from 0.28 (95% CI, 0.26-0.29) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) for Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance beneficiaries, respectively; SGLT2i, from 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22) to 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.61), respectively; and DPP-4i, from 0.37 (95% CI, 0.34-0.39) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78), respectively (P < .001 for all). The odds of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased with income; for an income of $200 000 and higher vs less than $40 000, the odds ratio for GLP-1RA was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) and for SGLT2i was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries may be less likely than commercially insured beneficiaries to be treated with newer medications to lower glucose levels, with greater disparities among lower-income patients. Better understanding of nonclinical factors contributing to treatment decisions and efforts to promote greater equity in diabetes management appear to be needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Medical Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78517262021-02-11 Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019 McCoy, Rozalina G. Van Houten, Holly K. Deng, Yihong Mandic, Pinar Karaca Ross, Joseph S. Montori, Victor M. Shah, Nilay D. JAMA Netw Open Original Investigation IMPORTANCE: Glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and postmarketing trials of GLP-1RA and SGLT2i demonstrated that these medications improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To compare trends in initiation of treatment with GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i by older adults with type 2 diabetes insured by Medicare Advantage vs commercial health plans. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data from a deidentified database of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Adults aged 58 to 66 years with type 2 diabetes who filled any medication prescription to lower glucose levels from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019, were compared between groups. EXPOSURE: Enrollment in a Medicare Advantage or commercial health insurance plan. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The odds of initiating GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment were examined for Medicare Advantage vs commercial insurance beneficiaries using 3 separate logistic regression models adjusted for year and demographic and clinical factors. These models were used to calculate adjusted annual rates of medication initiation by health plan. RESULTS: A total of 382 574 adults with pharmacologically treated type 2 diabetes (52.9% men; mean [SD] age, 62.4 [2.7] years) were identified, including 172 180 Medicare Advantage and 210 394 commercial beneficiaries. From 2016 to 2019, adjusted rates of initiation of GLP-1RA, SGLT2i, and DPP-4i treatment increased among all beneficiaries, from 2.14% to 20.02% for GLP-1RA among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.50% to 11.44% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; from 2.74% to 18.15% for SGLT2i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 1.57% to 8.51% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries; and from 3.30% to 11.71% for DPP-4i among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from 2.44% to 7.68% among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. Initiation rates for all 3 drug classes were consistently lower among Medicare Advantage than among commercial insurance beneficiaries. Within each calendar year, the odds of initiating GLP-1RA treatment ranged from 0.28 (95% CI, 0.26-0.29) to 0.70 (95% CI, 0.65-0.75) for Medicare Advantage and commercial insurance beneficiaries, respectively; SGLT2i, from 0.21 (95% CI, 0.20-0.22) to 0.57 (95% CI, 0.53-0.61), respectively; and DPP-4i, from 0.37 (95% CI, 0.34-0.39) to 0.73 (95% CI, 0.69-0.78), respectively (P < .001 for all). The odds of starting GLP-1RA and SGLT2i increased with income; for an income of $200 000 and higher vs less than $40 000, the odds ratio for GLP-1RA was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.15-1.32) and for SGLT2i was 1.16 (95% CI, 1.09-1.24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest that Medicare Advantage beneficiaries may be less likely than commercially insured beneficiaries to be treated with newer medications to lower glucose levels, with greater disparities among lower-income patients. Better understanding of nonclinical factors contributing to treatment decisions and efforts to promote greater equity in diabetes management appear to be needed. American Medical Association 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7851726/ /pubmed/33523188 http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792 Text en Copyright 2021 McCoy RG et al. JAMA Network Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.
spellingShingle Original Investigation
McCoy, Rozalina G.
Van Houten, Holly K.
Deng, Yihong
Mandic, Pinar Karaca
Ross, Joseph S.
Montori, Victor M.
Shah, Nilay D.
Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title_full Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title_fullStr Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title_short Comparison of Diabetes Medications Used by Adults With Commercial Insurance vs Medicare Advantage, 2016 to 2019
title_sort comparison of diabetes medications used by adults with commercial insurance vs medicare advantage, 2016 to 2019
topic Original Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33523188
http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35792
work_keys_str_mv AT mccoyrozalinag comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT vanhoutenhollyk comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT dengyihong comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT mandicpinarkaraca comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT rossjosephs comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT montorivictorm comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019
AT shahnilayd comparisonofdiabetesmedicationsusedbyadultswithcommercialinsurancevsmedicareadvantage2016to2019