Cargando…

Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report

Several types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarver, Jordan, Cregan, Melissa, Cain, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2021.e00287
_version_ 1783645693132406784
author Sarver, Jordan
Cregan, Melissa
Cain, Daniel
author_facet Sarver, Jordan
Cregan, Melissa
Cain, Daniel
author_sort Sarver, Jordan
collection PubMed
description Several types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an IUD by providers. A 38-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 2, para 2, presented for a colposcopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). She had had a copper IUD (ParaGard) placed 10 years prior. She now requested to have it removed. After completion of the colposcopy and EMB, the provider located the IUD strings for removal. During careful removal of the IUD, a piece was broken off and remained in the uterine cavity. Upon visual inspection of the removed IUD, the right wing was missing and presumed to be still in the patient. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) confirmed presence of a portion of the IUD in the uterine wall near the cervix. The patient was scheduled for surgical removal of the IUD by robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. This case highlights the importance of thorough evaluation of an IUD upon removal. Practitioners who work with IUD insertion and removal should remain informed about this rare complication. Risk of fracture during IUD removal should be better communicated between physicians and patients. This case study underlines the importance of careful IUD planning, from insertion to removal. Further research considering improved stepwise removal should be considered.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78517932021-02-05 Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report Sarver, Jordan Cregan, Melissa Cain, Daniel Case Rep Womens Health Article Several types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an IUD by providers. A 38-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 2, para 2, presented for a colposcopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). She had had a copper IUD (ParaGard) placed 10 years prior. She now requested to have it removed. After completion of the colposcopy and EMB, the provider located the IUD strings for removal. During careful removal of the IUD, a piece was broken off and remained in the uterine cavity. Upon visual inspection of the removed IUD, the right wing was missing and presumed to be still in the patient. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) confirmed presence of a portion of the IUD in the uterine wall near the cervix. The patient was scheduled for surgical removal of the IUD by robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. This case highlights the importance of thorough evaluation of an IUD upon removal. Practitioners who work with IUD insertion and removal should remain informed about this rare complication. Risk of fracture during IUD removal should be better communicated between physicians and patients. This case study underlines the importance of careful IUD planning, from insertion to removal. Further research considering improved stepwise removal should be considered. Elsevier 2021-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7851793/ /pubmed/33552933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2021.e00287 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Sarver, Jordan
Cregan, Melissa
Cain, Daniel
Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_full Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_fullStr Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_short Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_sort fractured copper intrauterine device (iud) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2021.e00287
work_keys_str_mv AT sarverjordan fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport
AT creganmelissa fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport
AT caindaniel fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport