Cargando…

Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate on whether fructose plays a role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content in a double-blind randomized controlled trial u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simons, Nynke, Veeraiah, Pandichelvam, Simons, Pomme I H G, Schaper, Nicolaas C, Kooi, M Eline, Schrauwen-Hinderling, Vera B, Feskens, Edith J M, van der Ploeg, E M C (Liesbeth), Van den Eynde, Mathias D G, Schalkwijk, Casper G, Stehouwer, Coen D A, Brouwers, Martijn C G J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa332
_version_ 1783645698100559872
author Simons, Nynke
Veeraiah, Pandichelvam
Simons, Pomme I H G
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Kooi, M Eline
Schrauwen-Hinderling, Vera B
Feskens, Edith J M
van der Ploeg, E M C (Liesbeth)
Van den Eynde, Mathias D G
Schalkwijk, Casper G
Stehouwer, Coen D A
Brouwers, Martijn C G J
author_facet Simons, Nynke
Veeraiah, Pandichelvam
Simons, Pomme I H G
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Kooi, M Eline
Schrauwen-Hinderling, Vera B
Feskens, Edith J M
van der Ploeg, E M C (Liesbeth)
Van den Eynde, Mathias D G
Schalkwijk, Casper G
Stehouwer, Coen D A
Brouwers, Martijn C G J
author_sort Simons, Nynke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate on whether fructose plays a role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content in a double-blind randomized controlled trial using an isocaloric comparator. METHODS: Between March 2017 and October 2019, 44 adult overweight individuals with a fatty liver index ≥ 60 consumed a 6-wk fructose-restricted diet (<7.5 g/meal and <10 g/d) and were randomly assigned to supplementation with sachets of glucose (= intervention group) or fructose (= control group) 3 times daily. Participants and assessors were blinded to the allocation. IHL content, assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, was the primary outcome and glucose tolerance and serum lipids were the secondary outcomes. All measurements were conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants completed the study protocol. After 6 wk of fructose restriction, dietary fructose intake and urinary fructose excretion were significantly lower in the intervention group (difference: −57.0 g/d; 95% CI: −77.9, −39.5 g/d; and −38.8 μmol/d; 95% CI: −91.2, −10.7 μmol/d, respectively). Although IHL content decreased in both the intervention and control groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), the change in IHL content was more pronounced in the intervention group (difference: −0.7% point, 95% CI: −2.0, −0.03% point). The changes in glucose tolerance and serum lipids were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of fructose restriction per se led to a small, but statistically significant, decrease in IHL content in comparison with an isocaloric control group. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03067428.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7851818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78518182021-02-04 Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial Simons, Nynke Veeraiah, Pandichelvam Simons, Pomme I H G Schaper, Nicolaas C Kooi, M Eline Schrauwen-Hinderling, Vera B Feskens, Edith J M van der Ploeg, E M C (Liesbeth) Van den Eynde, Mathias D G Schalkwijk, Casper G Stehouwer, Coen D A Brouwers, Martijn C G J Am J Clin Nutr Original Research Communications BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing debate on whether fructose plays a role in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of fructose restriction on intrahepatic lipid (IHL) content in a double-blind randomized controlled trial using an isocaloric comparator. METHODS: Between March 2017 and October 2019, 44 adult overweight individuals with a fatty liver index ≥ 60 consumed a 6-wk fructose-restricted diet (<7.5 g/meal and <10 g/d) and were randomly assigned to supplementation with sachets of glucose (= intervention group) or fructose (= control group) 3 times daily. Participants and assessors were blinded to the allocation. IHL content, assessed by proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy, was the primary outcome and glucose tolerance and serum lipids were the secondary outcomes. All measurements were conducted in Maastricht University Medical Center. RESULTS: Thirty-seven participants completed the study protocol. After 6 wk of fructose restriction, dietary fructose intake and urinary fructose excretion were significantly lower in the intervention group (difference: −57.0 g/d; 95% CI: −77.9, −39.5 g/d; and −38.8 μmol/d; 95% CI: −91.2, −10.7 μmol/d, respectively). Although IHL content decreased in both the intervention and control groups (P < 0.001 and P = 0.003, respectively), the change in IHL content was more pronounced in the intervention group (difference: −0.7% point, 95% CI: −2.0, −0.03% point). The changes in glucose tolerance and serum lipids were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of fructose restriction per se led to a small, but statistically significant, decrease in IHL content in comparison with an isocaloric control group. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03067428. Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7851818/ /pubmed/33381794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa332 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research Communications
Simons, Nynke
Veeraiah, Pandichelvam
Simons, Pomme I H G
Schaper, Nicolaas C
Kooi, M Eline
Schrauwen-Hinderling, Vera B
Feskens, Edith J M
van der Ploeg, E M C (Liesbeth)
Van den Eynde, Mathias D G
Schalkwijk, Casper G
Stehouwer, Coen D A
Brouwers, Martijn C G J
Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_short Effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (FRUITLESS); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
title_sort effects of fructose restriction on liver steatosis (fruitless); a double-blind randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research Communications
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/nqaa332
work_keys_str_mv AT simonsnynke effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT veeraiahpandichelvam effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT simonspommeihg effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schapernicolaasc effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kooimeline effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schrauwenhinderlingverab effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT feskensedithjm effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vanderploegemcliesbeth effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT vandeneyndemathiasdg effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schalkwijkcasperg effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stehouwercoenda effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brouwersmartijncgj effectsoffructoserestrictiononliversteatosisfruitlessadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial