Cargando…
Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience
PURPOSE: Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w |
_version_ | 1783645720989925376 |
---|---|
author | Wurm, M. Zyskowski, M. Greve, F. Gersing, A. Biberthaler, P. Kirchhoff, C. |
author_facet | Wurm, M. Zyskowski, M. Greve, F. Gersing, A. Biberthaler, P. Kirchhoff, C. |
author_sort | Wurm, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified. RESULTS: 80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7851941 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78519412021-02-03 Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience Wurm, M. Zyskowski, M. Greve, F. Gersing, A. Biberthaler, P. Kirchhoff, C. Eur J Med Res Research PURPOSE: Absence of cortical alignment in wedge-shaped and multifragmentary fractures (Fx) results in decreased fixation stability. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome using 2.0- vs. 3.5-mm screws for open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in dislocated, wedge-shaped or fragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients suffering from AO/OTA 15 2.A-C midshaft clavicle fractures were operatively treated between 2008 and 2018. 2.0- or 3.5-mm cortical screws were used to restore anatomic alignment in dislocated, wedge-shaped and fragmentary clavicle fractures. Data of radiologic outcome were collected until fracture consolidation was identified. RESULTS: 80 consecutive patients with a mean age of 44.5 ± 16.3 years, who were operatively treated for dislocated midshaft clavicle fractures were enrolled. 40 patients were treated using 2.0-mm and 40 patients using routine 3.5-mm cortical screws, respectively. Time to fracture consolidation was 12.8 ± 7.8 months. No mal- or non-unions occurred during routine follow-up until 18 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Restoring anatomic alignment in wedge or fragmentary clavicle fractures can ultimately be addressed using cortical screw augmentation. Both groups showed comparable results with respect to fracture reduction, fixation and stability as well as time to consolidation of the fracture, while the 2.0-mm screw diameter was associated with easier handling of small Fx fragments. BioMed Central 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7851941/ /pubmed/33531034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Wurm, M. Zyskowski, M. Greve, F. Gersing, A. Biberthaler, P. Kirchhoff, C. Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title | Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title_full | Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title_fullStr | Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title_short | Comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
title_sort | comparable results using 2.0-mm vs. 3.5-mm screw augmentation in midshaft clavicle fractures: a 10-year experience |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7851941/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40001-021-00487-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wurmm comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience AT zyskowskim comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience AT grevef comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience AT gersinga comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience AT biberthalerp comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience AT kirchhoffc comparableresultsusing20mmvs35mmscrewaugmentationinmidshaftclaviclefracturesa10yearexperience |