Cargando…

The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND: The retropancreatic fusion fascia is recognized as the anatomical landmark during retropancreatic mobilization. However, its role in D2 total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to develop the retropancreatic fusion fascia-oriented...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peng, Mengyin, Liu, Jian, Yang, XiaoBo, Liu, ShiChen, Wu, Miao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32386052
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.919003
_version_ 1783645739720638464
author Peng, Mengyin
Liu, Jian
Yang, XiaoBo
Liu, ShiChen
Wu, Miao
author_facet Peng, Mengyin
Liu, Jian
Yang, XiaoBo
Liu, ShiChen
Wu, Miao
author_sort Peng, Mengyin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The retropancreatic fusion fascia is recognized as the anatomical landmark during retropancreatic mobilization. However, its role in D2 total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to develop the retropancreatic fusion fascia-oriented ex vivo approach for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (RP-SL) to avoid difficulty in using the total laparoscopic approach (TL-SL). MATERIAL/METHODS: The data for patients with PAGC who underwent D2 total gastrectomy were retrieved from our clinical database and electronic medical records (December 2016 to December 2018), with a 1:1 match ratio for balance of the 2 groups. RESULTS: In sum, 84 matched patients were included in the study. There were 2360 retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), with an average of 28.10. Sixteen patients were confirmed with positive splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, and the mean harvested lymph nodes (LNs) were significantly increased in the RP-SL group compared to the TL-SL group (3.07 vs. 2.29, P<0.001), decreased operative time (193.21 min vs. 247.74 min, P<0.001), and less blood loss (96.90 mL vs. 185.24 mL, P=0.001) in the RP-SL group. Postoperative hospital stay (6.55 days vs. 7.26 days), rate of morbidity (9.50% vs. 11.91%), and overall costs (¥65255.64 vs. ¥64419.91) were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The landmark at the conjunction between the superior mesenteric vessels and the inferior pancreatic margin made it feasible to identify the retropancreatic areolar. The RP-SL approach was safe and efficient for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7852037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher International Scientific Literature, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78520372021-02-04 The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy Peng, Mengyin Liu, Jian Yang, XiaoBo Liu, ShiChen Wu, Miao Med Sci Monit Clinical Research BACKGROUND: The retropancreatic fusion fascia is recognized as the anatomical landmark during retropancreatic mobilization. However, its role in D2 total gastrectomy for proximal advanced gastric cancer (PAGC) remains unexplored. This study aimed to develop the retropancreatic fusion fascia-oriented ex vivo approach for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy (RP-SL) to avoid difficulty in using the total laparoscopic approach (TL-SL). MATERIAL/METHODS: The data for patients with PAGC who underwent D2 total gastrectomy were retrieved from our clinical database and electronic medical records (December 2016 to December 2018), with a 1:1 match ratio for balance of the 2 groups. RESULTS: In sum, 84 matched patients were included in the study. There were 2360 retrieved lymph nodes (LNs), with an average of 28.10. Sixteen patients were confirmed with positive splenic hilar lymphadenectomy, and the mean harvested lymph nodes (LNs) were significantly increased in the RP-SL group compared to the TL-SL group (3.07 vs. 2.29, P<0.001), decreased operative time (193.21 min vs. 247.74 min, P<0.001), and less blood loss (96.90 mL vs. 185.24 mL, P=0.001) in the RP-SL group. Postoperative hospital stay (6.55 days vs. 7.26 days), rate of morbidity (9.50% vs. 11.91%), and overall costs (¥65255.64 vs. ¥64419.91) were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The landmark at the conjunction between the superior mesenteric vessels and the inferior pancreatic margin made it feasible to identify the retropancreatic areolar. The RP-SL approach was safe and efficient for splenic hilar lymphadenectomy. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2020-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7852037/ /pubmed/32386052 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.919003 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2021 This work is licensed under Creative Common Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) )
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Peng, Mengyin
Liu, Jian
Yang, XiaoBo
Liu, ShiChen
Wu, Miao
The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title_full The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title_fullStr The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title_full_unstemmed The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title_short The Retropancreatic Fusion Fascia Oriented Splenic Hilar Lymphadenectomy Versus Laparoscopic Approach In D2 Total Gastrectomy
title_sort retropancreatic fusion fascia oriented splenic hilar lymphadenectomy versus laparoscopic approach in d2 total gastrectomy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7852037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32386052
http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.919003
work_keys_str_mv AT pengmengyin theretropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT liujian theretropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT yangxiaobo theretropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT liushichen theretropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT wumiao theretropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT pengmengyin retropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT liujian retropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT yangxiaobo retropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT liushichen retropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy
AT wumiao retropancreaticfusionfasciaorientedsplenichilarlymphadenectomyversuslaparoscopicapproachind2totalgastrectomy