Cargando…

Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ip, Athena, Muller, Ingrid, Geraghty, Adam W A, Platt, Duncan, Little, Paul, Santer, Miriam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794
_version_ 1783645900800786432
author Ip, Athena
Muller, Ingrid
Geraghty, Adam W A
Platt, Duncan
Little, Paul
Santer, Miriam
author_facet Ip, Athena
Muller, Ingrid
Geraghty, Adam W A
Platt, Duncan
Little, Paul
Santer, Miriam
author_sort Ip, Athena
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. METHODS: Papers were identified through Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL on 05 November 2019, forward and backward citation searching, Google Scholar and contacting authors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting qualitative data and analysis, studies carried out among people with acne, their carers or HCPs and studies comprising different skin conditions, including acne. The title and abstracts of papers were independently screened by three researchers. Appraisal was carried out using the adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise findings. RESULTS: A total of 20 papers were included from six countries. Papers explored; experiences living with acne, psychosocial impact of acne, views on causation of acne, perceptions of acne treatments, ambivalence and ambiguity in young people’s experience of acne and HCPs’ attitudes towards acne management. Findings suggest that people often viewed acne as short-term and that this had implications for acne management, particularly long-term treatment adherence. People often felt that the substantial impact of acne was not recognised by others, or that their condition was ‘trivialised’ by HCPs. The sense of a lack of control over acne and control over treatment was linked to both psychological impact and treatment adherence. Concerns and uncertainty over acne treatments were influenced by variable advice and information from others. CONCLUSIONS: People need support with understanding the long-term management of acne, building control over acne and its treatments, acknowledging the impact and appropriate information to reduce the barriers to effective treatment use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016050525.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7853035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78530352021-02-11 Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research Ip, Athena Muller, Ingrid Geraghty, Adam W A Platt, Duncan Little, Paul Santer, Miriam BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. METHODS: Papers were identified through Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL on 05 November 2019, forward and backward citation searching, Google Scholar and contacting authors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting qualitative data and analysis, studies carried out among people with acne, their carers or HCPs and studies comprising different skin conditions, including acne. The title and abstracts of papers were independently screened by three researchers. Appraisal was carried out using the adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise findings. RESULTS: A total of 20 papers were included from six countries. Papers explored; experiences living with acne, psychosocial impact of acne, views on causation of acne, perceptions of acne treatments, ambivalence and ambiguity in young people’s experience of acne and HCPs’ attitudes towards acne management. Findings suggest that people often viewed acne as short-term and that this had implications for acne management, particularly long-term treatment adherence. People often felt that the substantial impact of acne was not recognised by others, or that their condition was ‘trivialised’ by HCPs. The sense of a lack of control over acne and control over treatment was linked to both psychological impact and treatment adherence. Concerns and uncertainty over acne treatments were influenced by variable advice and information from others. CONCLUSIONS: People need support with understanding the long-term management of acne, building control over acne and its treatments, acknowledging the impact and appropriate information to reduce the barriers to effective treatment use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016050525. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7853035/ /pubmed/33526498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Dermatology
Ip, Athena
Muller, Ingrid
Geraghty, Adam W A
Platt, Duncan
Little, Paul
Santer, Miriam
Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_full Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_fullStr Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_short Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
title_sort views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
topic Dermatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526498
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794
work_keys_str_mv AT ipathena viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT mulleringrid viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT geraghtyadamwa viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT plattduncan viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT littlepaul viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT santermiriam viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch