Cargando…
Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. M...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794 |
_version_ | 1783645900800786432 |
---|---|
author | Ip, Athena Muller, Ingrid Geraghty, Adam W A Platt, Duncan Little, Paul Santer, Miriam |
author_facet | Ip, Athena Muller, Ingrid Geraghty, Adam W A Platt, Duncan Little, Paul Santer, Miriam |
author_sort | Ip, Athena |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. METHODS: Papers were identified through Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL on 05 November 2019, forward and backward citation searching, Google Scholar and contacting authors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting qualitative data and analysis, studies carried out among people with acne, their carers or HCPs and studies comprising different skin conditions, including acne. The title and abstracts of papers were independently screened by three researchers. Appraisal was carried out using the adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise findings. RESULTS: A total of 20 papers were included from six countries. Papers explored; experiences living with acne, psychosocial impact of acne, views on causation of acne, perceptions of acne treatments, ambivalence and ambiguity in young people’s experience of acne and HCPs’ attitudes towards acne management. Findings suggest that people often viewed acne as short-term and that this had implications for acne management, particularly long-term treatment adherence. People often felt that the substantial impact of acne was not recognised by others, or that their condition was ‘trivialised’ by HCPs. The sense of a lack of control over acne and control over treatment was linked to both psychological impact and treatment adherence. Concerns and uncertainty over acne treatments were influenced by variable advice and information from others. CONCLUSIONS: People need support with understanding the long-term management of acne, building control over acne and its treatments, acknowledging the impact and appropriate information to reduce the barriers to effective treatment use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016050525. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7853035 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78530352021-02-11 Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research Ip, Athena Muller, Ingrid Geraghty, Adam W A Platt, Duncan Little, Paul Santer, Miriam BMJ Open Dermatology OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesise qualitative papers exploring views and experiences of acne and its treatments among people with acne, their carers and healthcare professionals (HCPs). DESIGN: Systematic review and synthesis of qualitative papers. METHODS: Papers were identified through Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, PsychINFO and CINAHL on 05 November 2019, forward and backward citation searching, Google Scholar and contacting authors. Inclusion criteria were studies reporting qualitative data and analysis, studies carried out among people with acne, their carers or HCPs and studies comprising different skin conditions, including acne. The title and abstracts of papers were independently screened by three researchers. Appraisal was carried out using the adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Thematic synthesis was used to synthesise findings. RESULTS: A total of 20 papers were included from six countries. Papers explored; experiences living with acne, psychosocial impact of acne, views on causation of acne, perceptions of acne treatments, ambivalence and ambiguity in young people’s experience of acne and HCPs’ attitudes towards acne management. Findings suggest that people often viewed acne as short-term and that this had implications for acne management, particularly long-term treatment adherence. People often felt that the substantial impact of acne was not recognised by others, or that their condition was ‘trivialised’ by HCPs. The sense of a lack of control over acne and control over treatment was linked to both psychological impact and treatment adherence. Concerns and uncertainty over acne treatments were influenced by variable advice and information from others. CONCLUSIONS: People need support with understanding the long-term management of acne, building control over acne and its treatments, acknowledging the impact and appropriate information to reduce the barriers to effective treatment use. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016050525. BMJ Publishing Group 2021-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7853035/ /pubmed/33526498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Dermatology Ip, Athena Muller, Ingrid Geraghty, Adam W A Platt, Duncan Little, Paul Santer, Miriam Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title | Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full | Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_fullStr | Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_full_unstemmed | Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_short | Views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
title_sort | views and experiences of people with acne vulgaris and healthcare professionals about treatments: systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research |
topic | Dermatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853035/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33526498 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ipathena viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT mulleringrid viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT geraghtyadamwa viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT plattduncan viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT littlepaul viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch AT santermiriam viewsandexperiencesofpeoplewithacnevulgarisandhealthcareprofessionalsabouttreatmentssystematicreviewandthematicsynthesisofqualitativeresearch |