Cargando…

The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us

OBJECTIVE: To gather consumer perspectives of a mental health screening protocol and to identify the incidence of previously unrecognized mental health concerns (case finding). DESIGN: Pilot study using mixed methods: quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interviews). SETTING: Primary care health t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McMillan, Colleen, Lee, Joseph, Hillier, Loretta M., Milligan, James, Lee, Linda, Bauman, Craig, Ferguson, Michelle, Slonim, Karen, Weber, Kay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100032
_version_ 1783645945843417088
author McMillan, Colleen
Lee, Joseph
Hillier, Loretta M.
Milligan, James
Lee, Linda
Bauman, Craig
Ferguson, Michelle
Slonim, Karen
Weber, Kay
author_facet McMillan, Colleen
Lee, Joseph
Hillier, Loretta M.
Milligan, James
Lee, Linda
Bauman, Craig
Ferguson, Michelle
Slonim, Karen
Weber, Kay
author_sort McMillan, Colleen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To gather consumer perspectives of a mental health screening protocol and to identify the incidence of previously unrecognized mental health concerns (case finding). DESIGN: Pilot study using mixed methods: quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interviews). SETTING: Primary care health team in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=15) with spinal cord injury living in the community. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 81 years of age (mean=46); 12 were men, 8 had tetraplegia and 5 paraplegia. The number of years since injury ranged from 1 to 32 (mean=13). INTERVENTION: Implementation of a mental health screening protocol consisting of standardized screening tools for depression, anxiety, substance abuse, social isolation, somatoform disorder, functional status, chronic pain, and cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive results on screening tool, acceptability of the screening process, perceptions of the value of screening, and intentions to follow resulting treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Screening identified 11 of 15 individuals with a chronic pain condition; 1 individual screened positive for depression, 1 for anxiety, 3 for potential substance abuse, and 1 for social isolation. Most of the participants (12/13) rated the screening protocol as very acceptable. All but 1 individual intended to follow resulting treatment recommendations. Interview analyses generated themes related to disclosure of experiences that were incomplete that concealed important information and perceptions that the screening protocol failed to assess resiliency. Although perceived as valuable, participants felt screening tools alone did not capture information important to them. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools alone may not identify mental health issues. Interviews in addition to screening tools are needed to accurately identify mental health issues in this population. Identification of mental health issues is critical to ensuring access to effective interventions and improving health outcomes and quality of life for individuals with SCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7853364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78533642021-02-03 The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us McMillan, Colleen Lee, Joseph Hillier, Loretta M. Milligan, James Lee, Linda Bauman, Craig Ferguson, Michelle Slonim, Karen Weber, Kay Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To gather consumer perspectives of a mental health screening protocol and to identify the incidence of previously unrecognized mental health concerns (case finding). DESIGN: Pilot study using mixed methods: quantitative (survey) and qualitative (interviews). SETTING: Primary care health team in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=15) with spinal cord injury living in the community. Participants ranged in age from 21 to 81 years of age (mean=46); 12 were men, 8 had tetraplegia and 5 paraplegia. The number of years since injury ranged from 1 to 32 (mean=13). INTERVENTION: Implementation of a mental health screening protocol consisting of standardized screening tools for depression, anxiety, substance abuse, social isolation, somatoform disorder, functional status, chronic pain, and cognitive impairment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Positive results on screening tool, acceptability of the screening process, perceptions of the value of screening, and intentions to follow resulting treatment recommendations. RESULTS: Screening identified 11 of 15 individuals with a chronic pain condition; 1 individual screened positive for depression, 1 for anxiety, 3 for potential substance abuse, and 1 for social isolation. Most of the participants (12/13) rated the screening protocol as very acceptable. All but 1 individual intended to follow resulting treatment recommendations. Interview analyses generated themes related to disclosure of experiences that were incomplete that concealed important information and perceptions that the screening protocol failed to assess resiliency. Although perceived as valuable, participants felt screening tools alone did not capture information important to them. CONCLUSIONS: Screening tools alone may not identify mental health issues. Interviews in addition to screening tools are needed to accurately identify mental health issues in this population. Identification of mental health issues is critical to ensuring access to effective interventions and improving health outcomes and quality of life for individuals with SCI. Elsevier 2019-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7853364/ /pubmed/33543062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100032 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
McMillan, Colleen
Lee, Joseph
Hillier, Loretta M.
Milligan, James
Lee, Linda
Bauman, Craig
Ferguson, Michelle
Slonim, Karen
Weber, Kay
The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title_full The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title_fullStr The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title_full_unstemmed The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title_short The Value in Mental Health Screening for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: What Patients Tell Us
title_sort value in mental health screening for individuals with spinal cord injury: what patients tell us
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100032
work_keys_str_mv AT mcmillancolleen thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT leejoseph thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT hillierlorettam thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT milliganjames thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT leelinda thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT baumancraig thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT fergusonmichelle thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT slonimkaren thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT weberkay thevalueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT mcmillancolleen valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT leejoseph valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT hillierlorettam valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT milliganjames valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT leelinda valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT baumancraig valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT fergusonmichelle valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT slonimkaren valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus
AT weberkay valueinmentalhealthscreeningforindividualswithspinalcordinjurywhatpatientstellus