Cargando…

Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis

OBJECTIVE: To better understand the role of the presence or absence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting functional outcomes following a severe-moderate stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective exploratory analysis. We compared the effects of the stimulation condition (active or sham), MEP status (+...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Powell, Elizabeth S., Westgate, Philip M., Goldstein, Larry B., Sawaki, Lumy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100023
_version_ 1783645948439691264
author Powell, Elizabeth S.
Westgate, Philip M.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Sawaki, Lumy
author_facet Powell, Elizabeth S.
Westgate, Philip M.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Sawaki, Lumy
author_sort Powell, Elizabeth S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To better understand the role of the presence or absence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting functional outcomes following a severe-moderate stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective exploratory analysis. We compared the effects of the stimulation condition (active or sham), MEP status (+ or −), and a combination of stimulation condition and MEP status on outcome. Within-group and between-group changes were assessed with longitudinal repeated measures analysis of variance and longitudinal repeated measures analysis of covariance, respectively. The proportions of participants who achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the main outcome measures were calculated. SETTING: University research laboratory within a rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 subjects with severe-moderate stroke-related motor impairments who participated in previous studies combining neuromodulation and motor training INTERVENTIONS: Neuromodulation (active or sham) and motor training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). RESULTS: When participants were grouped by stimulation condition or MEP status, all groups improved from baseline to immediate postintervention and follow-up evaluations (all P<.05). Analysis by stimulation condition and MEP status found that the MEP−/active group improved by 4.2 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 1.8 on ARAT (P=.003) post intervention. The MEP+/active group improved by 5.7 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 3.9 points on ARAT (P<.0001) post intervention. There were no between-group differences (P>.05). Regarding MCIDs, in the MEP−/active group, 14.5% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 8.3% on ARAT post intervention. In the MEP+/active group, 33.3% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 27.3% on ARAT post intervention. CONCLUSION: As expected, the MEP+ group had the greatest improvement in motor function. However, it was shown that individuals without MEPs can also achieve meaningful changes, as reflected by MCID, when neuromodulation is paired with motor training. To our knowledge, this is the first study to differentiate the effects of neuromodulation by MEP status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7853378
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78533782021-02-03 Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis Powell, Elizabeth S. Westgate, Philip M. Goldstein, Larry B. Sawaki, Lumy Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To better understand the role of the presence or absence of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) in predicting functional outcomes following a severe-moderate stroke. DESIGN: Retrospective exploratory analysis. We compared the effects of the stimulation condition (active or sham), MEP status (+ or −), and a combination of stimulation condition and MEP status on outcome. Within-group and between-group changes were assessed with longitudinal repeated measures analysis of variance and longitudinal repeated measures analysis of covariance, respectively. The proportions of participants who achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the main outcome measures were calculated. SETTING: University research laboratory within a rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 129 subjects with severe-moderate stroke-related motor impairments who participated in previous studies combining neuromodulation and motor training INTERVENTIONS: Neuromodulation (active or sham) and motor training. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) and Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). RESULTS: When participants were grouped by stimulation condition or MEP status, all groups improved from baseline to immediate postintervention and follow-up evaluations (all P<.05). Analysis by stimulation condition and MEP status found that the MEP−/active group improved by 4.2 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 1.8 on ARAT (P=.003) post intervention. The MEP+/active group improved by 5.7 points on FMA (P<.0001) and 3.9 points on ARAT (P<.0001) post intervention. There were no between-group differences (P>.05). Regarding MCIDs, in the MEP−/active group, 14.5% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 8.3% on ARAT post intervention. In the MEP+/active group, 33.3% of individuals reached MCID on FMA and 27.3% on ARAT post intervention. CONCLUSION: As expected, the MEP+ group had the greatest improvement in motor function. However, it was shown that individuals without MEPs can also achieve meaningful changes, as reflected by MCID, when neuromodulation is paired with motor training. To our knowledge, this is the first study to differentiate the effects of neuromodulation by MEP status. Elsevier 2019-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7853378/ /pubmed/33543054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100023 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Powell, Elizabeth S.
Westgate, Philip M.
Goldstein, Larry B.
Sawaki, Lumy
Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title_full Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title_fullStr Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title_short Absence of Motor-Evoked Potentials Does Not Predict Poor Recovery in Patients With Severe-Moderate Stroke: An Exploratory Analysis
title_sort absence of motor-evoked potentials does not predict poor recovery in patients with severe-moderate stroke: an exploratory analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853378/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2019.100023
work_keys_str_mv AT powellelizabeths absenceofmotorevokedpotentialsdoesnotpredictpoorrecoveryinpatientswithseveremoderatestrokeanexploratoryanalysis
AT westgatephilipm absenceofmotorevokedpotentialsdoesnotpredictpoorrecoveryinpatientswithseveremoderatestrokeanexploratoryanalysis
AT goldsteinlarryb absenceofmotorevokedpotentialsdoesnotpredictpoorrecoveryinpatientswithseveremoderatestrokeanexploratoryanalysis
AT sawakilumy absenceofmotorevokedpotentialsdoesnotpredictpoorrecoveryinpatientswithseveremoderatestrokeanexploratoryanalysis