Cargando…

Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services

OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clini...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keating, Shelley E., Barnett, Amandine, Croci, Ilaria, Hannigan, Amy, Elvin-Walsh, Louise, Coombes, Jeff S., Campbell, Katrina L., Macdonald, Graeme A., Hickman, Ingrid J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066
_version_ 1783645952273285120
author Keating, Shelley E.
Barnett, Amandine
Croci, Ilaria
Hannigan, Amy
Elvin-Walsh, Louise
Coombes, Jeff S.
Campbell, Katrina L.
Macdonald, Graeme A.
Hickman, Ingrid J.
author_facet Keating, Shelley E.
Barnett, Amandine
Croci, Ilaria
Hannigan, Amy
Elvin-Walsh, Louise
Coombes, Jeff S.
Campbell, Katrina L.
Macdonald, Graeme A.
Hickman, Ingrid J.
author_sort Keating, Shelley E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clinicians measured standard clinical and functional parameters at a face-to-face clinic appointment. Participants were instructed on how to perform the measures at home and to repeat self-assessments within 1 week. PARTICIPANTS: Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) (N=18) (52±14y, 56% men, 5.4±4.3y posttransplant] completed the home self-assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes assessed were body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), waist circumference, repeated chair sit-to-stand (STST), maximal push-ups, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Intertester reliability and agreement between face-to-face clinician and self-reported home-based participant measures were determined by intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, which were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) (determined a priori). RESULTS: The mean difference (95% confidence interval) and [limits of agreement] for measures (where positive values indicate lower participant value) were weight, 0.7 (0.01-1.4) kg [−2.2 to 3.6kg]; waist 0.4 (−1.2 to 2.0) cm [−5.9 to 6.8cm]; SBP 7.7 (0.6-14.7 ) mmHg [−19.4 to 34.9mmHg]; DBP 2.4 (−1.4 to 6.2 ) mmHg [−12.2 to 17.0mmHg]; 6MWT, 7.5 (−29.1 to 44.1) m [−127.3 to 142.4m]; STST 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.7) seconds [−4.3 to 5.3s]; maximal push-ups −2.2 (−4.4 to −0.1) [−10.5 to 6.0]. ICCs were all >0.75 except for STST (ICC=0.73). Mean differences indicated good agreement than MCIDs; however, wide limits of agreement indicated large individual variability in agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LTRs can reliably self-assess clinical and functional measures at home. However, there was wide individual variability in accuracy and agreement, with no functional assessment being performed within acceptable limits relative to MCIDs >80% of the time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7853394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78533942021-02-03 Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services Keating, Shelley E. Barnett, Amandine Croci, Ilaria Hannigan, Amy Elvin-Walsh, Louise Coombes, Jeff S. Campbell, Katrina L. Macdonald, Graeme A. Hickman, Ingrid J. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clinicians measured standard clinical and functional parameters at a face-to-face clinic appointment. Participants were instructed on how to perform the measures at home and to repeat self-assessments within 1 week. PARTICIPANTS: Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) (N=18) (52±14y, 56% men, 5.4±4.3y posttransplant] completed the home self-assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes assessed were body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), waist circumference, repeated chair sit-to-stand (STST), maximal push-ups, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Intertester reliability and agreement between face-to-face clinician and self-reported home-based participant measures were determined by intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, which were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) (determined a priori). RESULTS: The mean difference (95% confidence interval) and [limits of agreement] for measures (where positive values indicate lower participant value) were weight, 0.7 (0.01-1.4) kg [−2.2 to 3.6kg]; waist 0.4 (−1.2 to 2.0) cm [−5.9 to 6.8cm]; SBP 7.7 (0.6-14.7 ) mmHg [−19.4 to 34.9mmHg]; DBP 2.4 (−1.4 to 6.2 ) mmHg [−12.2 to 17.0mmHg]; 6MWT, 7.5 (−29.1 to 44.1) m [−127.3 to 142.4m]; STST 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.7) seconds [−4.3 to 5.3s]; maximal push-ups −2.2 (−4.4 to −0.1) [−10.5 to 6.0]. ICCs were all >0.75 except for STST (ICC=0.73). Mean differences indicated good agreement than MCIDs; however, wide limits of agreement indicated large individual variability in agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LTRs can reliably self-assess clinical and functional measures at home. However, there was wide individual variability in accuracy and agreement, with no functional assessment being performed within acceptable limits relative to MCIDs >80% of the time. Elsevier 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7853394/ /pubmed/33543092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Keating, Shelley E.
Barnett, Amandine
Croci, Ilaria
Hannigan, Amy
Elvin-Walsh, Louise
Coombes, Jeff S.
Campbell, Katrina L.
Macdonald, Graeme A.
Hickman, Ingrid J.
Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title_full Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title_fullStr Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title_full_unstemmed Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title_short Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
title_sort agreement and reliability of clinician-in-clinic versus patient-at-home clinical and functional assessments: implications for telehealth services
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543092
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066
work_keys_str_mv AT keatingshelleye agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT barnettamandine agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT crociilaria agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT hanniganamy agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT elvinwalshlouise agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT coombesjeffs agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT campbellkatrinal agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT macdonaldgraemea agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices
AT hickmaningridj agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices