Cargando…
Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services
OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clini...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066 |
_version_ | 1783645952273285120 |
---|---|
author | Keating, Shelley E. Barnett, Amandine Croci, Ilaria Hannigan, Amy Elvin-Walsh, Louise Coombes, Jeff S. Campbell, Katrina L. Macdonald, Graeme A. Hickman, Ingrid J. |
author_facet | Keating, Shelley E. Barnett, Amandine Croci, Ilaria Hannigan, Amy Elvin-Walsh, Louise Coombes, Jeff S. Campbell, Katrina L. Macdonald, Graeme A. Hickman, Ingrid J. |
author_sort | Keating, Shelley E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clinicians measured standard clinical and functional parameters at a face-to-face clinic appointment. Participants were instructed on how to perform the measures at home and to repeat self-assessments within 1 week. PARTICIPANTS: Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) (N=18) (52±14y, 56% men, 5.4±4.3y posttransplant] completed the home self-assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes assessed were body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), waist circumference, repeated chair sit-to-stand (STST), maximal push-ups, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Intertester reliability and agreement between face-to-face clinician and self-reported home-based participant measures were determined by intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, which were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) (determined a priori). RESULTS: The mean difference (95% confidence interval) and [limits of agreement] for measures (where positive values indicate lower participant value) were weight, 0.7 (0.01-1.4) kg [−2.2 to 3.6kg]; waist 0.4 (−1.2 to 2.0) cm [−5.9 to 6.8cm]; SBP 7.7 (0.6-14.7 ) mmHg [−19.4 to 34.9mmHg]; DBP 2.4 (−1.4 to 6.2 ) mmHg [−12.2 to 17.0mmHg]; 6MWT, 7.5 (−29.1 to 44.1) m [−127.3 to 142.4m]; STST 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.7) seconds [−4.3 to 5.3s]; maximal push-ups −2.2 (−4.4 to −0.1) [−10.5 to 6.0]. ICCs were all >0.75 except for STST (ICC=0.73). Mean differences indicated good agreement than MCIDs; however, wide limits of agreement indicated large individual variability in agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LTRs can reliably self-assess clinical and functional measures at home. However, there was wide individual variability in accuracy and agreement, with no functional assessment being performed within acceptable limits relative to MCIDs >80% of the time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7853394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78533942021-02-03 Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services Keating, Shelley E. Barnett, Amandine Croci, Ilaria Hannigan, Amy Elvin-Walsh, Louise Coombes, Jeff S. Campbell, Katrina L. Macdonald, Graeme A. Hickman, Ingrid J. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl Original Research OBJECTIVE: To compare agreement and reliability between clinician-measured and patient self-measured clinical and functional assessments for use in remote monitoring, in a home-based setting, using telehealth. DESIGN: Reliability study: repeated-measure, within-subject design. SETTING: Trained clinicians measured standard clinical and functional parameters at a face-to-face clinic appointment. Participants were instructed on how to perform the measures at home and to repeat self-assessments within 1 week. PARTICIPANTS: Liver transplant recipients (LTRs) (N=18) (52±14y, 56% men, 5.4±4.3y posttransplant] completed the home self-assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcomes assessed were body weight, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), waist circumference, repeated chair sit-to-stand (STST), maximal push-ups, and the 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Intertester reliability and agreement between face-to-face clinician and self-reported home-based participant measures were determined by intraclass-correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman plots, which were compared with minimal clinically important differences (MCID) (determined a priori). RESULTS: The mean difference (95% confidence interval) and [limits of agreement] for measures (where positive values indicate lower participant value) were weight, 0.7 (0.01-1.4) kg [−2.2 to 3.6kg]; waist 0.4 (−1.2 to 2.0) cm [−5.9 to 6.8cm]; SBP 7.7 (0.6-14.7 ) mmHg [−19.4 to 34.9mmHg]; DBP 2.4 (−1.4 to 6.2 ) mmHg [−12.2 to 17.0mmHg]; 6MWT, 7.5 (−29.1 to 44.1) m [−127.3 to 142.4m]; STST 0.5 (−0.8 to 1.7) seconds [−4.3 to 5.3s]; maximal push-ups −2.2 (−4.4 to −0.1) [−10.5 to 6.0]. ICCs were all >0.75 except for STST (ICC=0.73). Mean differences indicated good agreement than MCIDs; however, wide limits of agreement indicated large individual variability in agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, LTRs can reliably self-assess clinical and functional measures at home. However, there was wide individual variability in accuracy and agreement, with no functional assessment being performed within acceptable limits relative to MCIDs >80% of the time. Elsevier 2020-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7853394/ /pubmed/33543092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Keating, Shelley E. Barnett, Amandine Croci, Ilaria Hannigan, Amy Elvin-Walsh, Louise Coombes, Jeff S. Campbell, Katrina L. Macdonald, Graeme A. Hickman, Ingrid J. Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title | Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title_full | Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title_fullStr | Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title_full_unstemmed | Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title_short | Agreement and Reliability of Clinician-in-Clinic Versus Patient-at-Home Clinical and Functional Assessments: Implications for Telehealth Services |
title_sort | agreement and reliability of clinician-in-clinic versus patient-at-home clinical and functional assessments: implications for telehealth services |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33543092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100066 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT keatingshelleye agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT barnettamandine agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT crociilaria agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT hanniganamy agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT elvinwalshlouise agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT coombesjeffs agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT campbellkatrinal agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT macdonaldgraemea agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices AT hickmaningridj agreementandreliabilityofclinicianinclinicversuspatientathomeclinicalandfunctionalassessmentsimplicationsfortelehealthservices |