Cargando…

A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing

Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom to improve patient care, but early research indicated a third of Allied Health Professionals may not use their prescribing qualification. A previous literature review, highlighting factors influencing prescribing, identified only papers...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graham-Clarke, Emma, Rushton, Alison, Marriott, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33529197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246273
_version_ 1783645961467199488
author Graham-Clarke, Emma
Rushton, Alison
Marriott, John
author_facet Graham-Clarke, Emma
Rushton, Alison
Marriott, John
author_sort Graham-Clarke, Emma
collection PubMed
description Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom to improve patient care, but early research indicated a third of Allied Health Professionals may not use their prescribing qualification. A previous literature review, highlighting factors influencing prescribing, identified only papers with nursing and pharmacy participants. This investigation explored consensus on factors affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribers. A three round Delphi study was conducted with pharmacist and physiotherapist prescribers. Round One comprised information gathering on facilitators and barriers to prescribing participants had experienced, and underwent content analysis. This was followed by two sequential consensus seeking rounds with participants asked to rate the importance of statements to themselves. Consensus criteria were determined a priori, including median, interquartile range, percentage agreement and Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (W). Statements reaching consensus were ranked for importance in Round Three and analysed to produce top ten ranks for all participants and for each professional group. Participants, recruited October 2018, comprised 24 pharmacists and 18 physiotherapists. In Round One, content analysis of 172 statements regarding prescribing influences revealed 24 themes. 127 statements were included in Round Two for importance rating (barriers = 68, facilitators = 59). After Round Two, 29 statements reached consensus (barriers = 1, facilitators = 28), with no further statements reaching consensus following Round Three. The highest ranked statement in Round Three overall was: “Being able to prescribe to patients is more effective and really useful working [in my area]”. Medical support and improved patient care factors appeared the most important. Differences were noted between physiotherapist and pharmacist prescribers regarding the top ten ranked statements, for example team working which pharmacists ranked higher than physiotherapists. Differences may be explained by the variety of practice areas and relative newness of physiotherapy prescribing. Barriers appear to be post or person specific, whereas facilitators appear universal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7853445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78534452021-02-09 A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing Graham-Clarke, Emma Rushton, Alison Marriott, John PLoS One Research Article Non-medical prescribing was introduced into the United Kingdom to improve patient care, but early research indicated a third of Allied Health Professionals may not use their prescribing qualification. A previous literature review, highlighting factors influencing prescribing, identified only papers with nursing and pharmacy participants. This investigation explored consensus on factors affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribers. A three round Delphi study was conducted with pharmacist and physiotherapist prescribers. Round One comprised information gathering on facilitators and barriers to prescribing participants had experienced, and underwent content analysis. This was followed by two sequential consensus seeking rounds with participants asked to rate the importance of statements to themselves. Consensus criteria were determined a priori, including median, interquartile range, percentage agreement and Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance (W). Statements reaching consensus were ranked for importance in Round Three and analysed to produce top ten ranks for all participants and for each professional group. Participants, recruited October 2018, comprised 24 pharmacists and 18 physiotherapists. In Round One, content analysis of 172 statements regarding prescribing influences revealed 24 themes. 127 statements were included in Round Two for importance rating (barriers = 68, facilitators = 59). After Round Two, 29 statements reached consensus (barriers = 1, facilitators = 28), with no further statements reaching consensus following Round Three. The highest ranked statement in Round Three overall was: “Being able to prescribe to patients is more effective and really useful working [in my area]”. Medical support and improved patient care factors appeared the most important. Differences were noted between physiotherapist and pharmacist prescribers regarding the top ten ranked statements, for example team working which pharmacists ranked higher than physiotherapists. Differences may be explained by the variety of practice areas and relative newness of physiotherapy prescribing. Barriers appear to be post or person specific, whereas facilitators appear universal. Public Library of Science 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7853445/ /pubmed/33529197 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246273 Text en © 2021 Graham-Clarke et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Graham-Clarke, Emma
Rushton, Alison
Marriott, John
A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title_full A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title_fullStr A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title_full_unstemmed A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title_short A Delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
title_sort delphi study to explore and gain consensus regarding the most important barriers and facilitators affecting physiotherapist and pharmacist non-medical prescribing
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33529197
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246273
work_keys_str_mv AT grahamclarkeemma adelphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing
AT rushtonalison adelphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing
AT marriottjohn adelphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing
AT grahamclarkeemma delphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing
AT rushtonalison delphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing
AT marriottjohn delphistudytoexploreandgainconsensusregardingthemostimportantbarriersandfacilitatorsaffectingphysiotherapistandpharmacistnonmedicalprescribing