Cargando…

Impact of implementing a protocol of respiratory care measures and optimization of mechanical ventilation in potential lung donors

OBJECTIVE: To describe the results from the implementation of a respiratory care and mechanical ventilation protocol on potential lung donors who met the conditions for procurement. The secondary objective is to compare the results with historical data. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bezzi, Marco Guillermo, Brovia, Carla Candela, Carballo, Juan Manuel, Elías, Maia Inés, Moreno, Agustina Belén, Ruiz, Vanesa Romina, Cordiviola, Fernanda, Barbieri, David, Fariña, Adriana, Borello, Silvina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Associação de Medicina Intensiva Brasileira - AMIB 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7853675/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33470359
http://dx.doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.20200095
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To describe the results from the implementation of a respiratory care and mechanical ventilation protocol on potential lung donors who met the conditions for procurement. The secondary objective is to compare the results with historical data. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study. It included potential donors suitable for procurement of organs who had brain death and were hospitalized in critical care units of the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires from April 2017 to March 2018. Main variables: number of potential lung donors that reached the objective of procurement, rate of lungs procured, and rate of implanted lungs. Values of p < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Thirty potential lung donors were included, and 23 (88.5%; 95%CI 69.8 - 97.6) met the oxygenation objective. Twenty potential lung donors donated organs, of whom eight donated lungs, with which four double lung transplants and eight single lung transplants were performed. Seven of 12 lungs were procured and implanted in the preprotocol period, while all 12 were under the protocol (p = 0.38). The implantation rate was 58.3% (7/12) in the historical control period and 100% (12/12) (p = 0.04) in the study period.