Cargando…

Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is an essential skill that nursing students need to develop. Technological tools have opened new avenues for technology-supported guidance models, but the challenges and facilitators of such guidance models, as well as how they stimulate the development of critical thin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zlamal, Jaroslav, Gjevjon, Edith Roth, Fossum, Mariann, Solberg, Marianne Trygg, Steindal, Simen Alexander, Strandell-Laine, Camilla, Larsen, Marie Hamilton, Pettersen, Fredrik Solvang, Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464214
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25126
_version_ 1783646052822286336
author Zlamal, Jaroslav
Gjevjon, Edith Roth
Fossum, Mariann
Solberg, Marianne Trygg
Steindal, Simen Alexander
Strandell-Laine, Camilla
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
Pettersen, Fredrik Solvang
Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves
author_facet Zlamal, Jaroslav
Gjevjon, Edith Roth
Fossum, Mariann
Solberg, Marianne Trygg
Steindal, Simen Alexander
Strandell-Laine, Camilla
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
Pettersen, Fredrik Solvang
Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves
author_sort Zlamal, Jaroslav
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is an essential skill that nursing students need to develop. Technological tools have opened new avenues for technology-supported guidance models, but the challenges and facilitators of such guidance models, as well as how they stimulate the development of critical thinking, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We developed a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review to investigate the use of technology-supported guidance models that stimulate the development of critical thinking in nursing education clinical practice. METHODS: A convergent integrated design following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis will be employed. A pair of authors will select the articles by screening titles and abstracts, and the methodological quality of the articles included in the review will be assessed by a pair of authors according to checklists for specific study designs. The data will be extracted using the standardized Joanna Briggs Institute mixed methods data extraction form and following a convergent integrated approach. The thematic synthesis for data transformation will be used. RESULTS: Development of a comprehensive systematic search strategy was completed in October 2020. The database searches were performed on October 21, 2020. As of January 2021, analysis and synthesis is ongoing. Completion of this review is expected by January 2021. CONCLUSIONS: By combining evidence from studies with varied methodological approaches, the results should provide broad insight into the use of technology-supported guidance models for clinical practice in nursing education with a focus on the development of nursing students’ critical thinking. The results of this mixed methods systematic review can also be used to develop or improve current technology-supported guidance models for clinical practice in nursing education. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/25126
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7854029
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78540292021-02-05 Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review Zlamal, Jaroslav Gjevjon, Edith Roth Fossum, Mariann Solberg, Marianne Trygg Steindal, Simen Alexander Strandell-Laine, Camilla Larsen, Marie Hamilton Pettersen, Fredrik Solvang Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: Critical thinking is an essential skill that nursing students need to develop. Technological tools have opened new avenues for technology-supported guidance models, but the challenges and facilitators of such guidance models, as well as how they stimulate the development of critical thinking, remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: We developed a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review to investigate the use of technology-supported guidance models that stimulate the development of critical thinking in nursing education clinical practice. METHODS: A convergent integrated design following the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis will be employed. A pair of authors will select the articles by screening titles and abstracts, and the methodological quality of the articles included in the review will be assessed by a pair of authors according to checklists for specific study designs. The data will be extracted using the standardized Joanna Briggs Institute mixed methods data extraction form and following a convergent integrated approach. The thematic synthesis for data transformation will be used. RESULTS: Development of a comprehensive systematic search strategy was completed in October 2020. The database searches were performed on October 21, 2020. As of January 2021, analysis and synthesis is ongoing. Completion of this review is expected by January 2021. CONCLUSIONS: By combining evidence from studies with varied methodological approaches, the results should provide broad insight into the use of technology-supported guidance models for clinical practice in nursing education with a focus on the development of nursing students’ critical thinking. The results of this mixed methods systematic review can also be used to develop or improve current technology-supported guidance models for clinical practice in nursing education. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/25126 JMIR Publications 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7854029/ /pubmed/33464214 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25126 Text en ©Jaroslav Zlamal, Edith Roth Gjevjon, Mariann Fossum, Marianne Trygg Solberg, Simen Alexander Steindal, Camilla Strandell-Laine, Marie Hamilton Larsen, Fredrik Solvang Pettersen, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves Nes. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (http://www.researchprotocols.org), 19.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Zlamal, Jaroslav
Gjevjon, Edith Roth
Fossum, Mariann
Solberg, Marianne Trygg
Steindal, Simen Alexander
Strandell-Laine, Camilla
Larsen, Marie Hamilton
Pettersen, Fredrik Solvang
Nes, Andréa Aparecida Gonçalves
Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title_full Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title_fullStr Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title_short Technology-Supported Guidance Models Stimulating the Development of Critical Thinking in Clinical Practice: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review
title_sort technology-supported guidance models stimulating the development of critical thinking in clinical practice: protocol for a mixed methods systematic review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854029/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464214
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/25126
work_keys_str_mv AT zlamaljaroslav technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT gjevjonedithroth technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT fossummariann technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT solbergmariannetrygg technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT steindalsimenalexander technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT strandelllainecamilla technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT larsenmariehamilton technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT pettersenfredriksolvang technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview
AT nesandreaaparecidagoncalves technologysupportedguidancemodelsstimulatingthedevelopmentofcriticalthinkinginclinicalpracticeprotocolforamixedmethodssystematicreview