Cargando…

The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study

BACKGROUND: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centered approaches to support families in hospital- and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enabl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patel, Shrujna, Boulton, Kelsie Ann, Redoblado-Hodge, Marie Antoinette, Papanicolaou, Angela, Barnett, Diana, Bennett, Beverley, Drevensek, Suzi, Cramsie, Jane, Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi, Ong, Natalie, Rozsa, Magdalen, Sutherland, Rebecca, Williamsz, Marcia, Pokorski, Izabella, Song, Yun Ju Christine, Silove, Natalie, Guastella, Adam John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464217
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18214
_version_ 1783646053285756928
author Patel, Shrujna
Boulton, Kelsie Ann
Redoblado-Hodge, Marie Antoinette
Papanicolaou, Angela
Barnett, Diana
Bennett, Beverley
Drevensek, Suzi
Cramsie, Jane
Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi
Ong, Natalie
Rozsa, Magdalen
Sutherland, Rebecca
Williamsz, Marcia
Pokorski, Izabella
Song, Yun Ju Christine
Silove, Natalie
Guastella, Adam John
author_facet Patel, Shrujna
Boulton, Kelsie Ann
Redoblado-Hodge, Marie Antoinette
Papanicolaou, Angela
Barnett, Diana
Bennett, Beverley
Drevensek, Suzi
Cramsie, Jane
Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi
Ong, Natalie
Rozsa, Magdalen
Sutherland, Rebecca
Williamsz, Marcia
Pokorski, Izabella
Song, Yun Ju Christine
Silove, Natalie
Guastella, Adam John
author_sort Patel, Shrujna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centered approaches to support families in hospital- and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education, and ethnic background. METHODS: Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first on-site clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire. RESULTS: Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (164/184, 89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (24/62, 39%; P<.001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaire online (151/173, 87.3%), compared to paper completion (22/173, 12.7%; P<.001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated with modality preference, such that those with a higher level of education reported a greater preference for EDC (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that EDC is feasible in hospital-based clinics and has the potential to offer substantial benefits in terms of centralized data collation, time and cost savings, efficiency of service, and resource allocation. The results of this study therefore support the continued use of electronic methods to improve family-centered care in clinical practices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7854031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78540312021-02-05 The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study Patel, Shrujna Boulton, Kelsie Ann Redoblado-Hodge, Marie Antoinette Papanicolaou, Angela Barnett, Diana Bennett, Beverley Drevensek, Suzi Cramsie, Jane Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi Ong, Natalie Rozsa, Magdalen Sutherland, Rebecca Williamsz, Marcia Pokorski, Izabella Song, Yun Ju Christine Silove, Natalie Guastella, Adam John JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: There is a growing need for cost-efficient and patient-centered approaches to support families in hospital- and community-based neurodevelopmental services. For such purposes, electronic data collection (EDC) may hold advantages over paper-based data collection. Such EDC approaches enable automated data collection for scoring and interpretation, saving time for clinicians and services and promoting more efficient service delivery. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of EDC for the Child Development Unit, a hospital-based diagnostic assessment clinic in the Sydney Children’s Hospital Network. Caregiver response rates and preference for EDC or paper-based methods were evaluated as well as the moderating role of demographic characteristics such as age, level of education, and ethnic background. METHODS: Families were sent either a paper-based questionnaire via post or an electronic mail link for completion before attending their first on-site clinic appointment for assessment. A total of 62 families were provided a paper version of the questionnaire, while 184 families were provided the online version of the same questionnaire. RESULTS: Completion rates of the questionnaire before the first appointment were significantly higher for EDC (164/184, 89.1%) in comparison to paper-based methods (24/62, 39%; P<.001). Within the EDC group, a vast majority of respondents indicated a preference for completing the questionnaire online (151/173, 87.3%), compared to paper completion (22/173, 12.7%; P<.001). Of the caregiver demographic characteristics, only the respondent’s level of education was associated with modality preference, such that those with a higher level of education reported a greater preference for EDC (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: These results show that EDC is feasible in hospital-based clinics and has the potential to offer substantial benefits in terms of centralized data collation, time and cost savings, efficiency of service, and resource allocation. The results of this study therefore support the continued use of electronic methods to improve family-centered care in clinical practices. JMIR Publications 2021-01-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7854031/ /pubmed/33464217 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18214 Text en ©Shrujna Patel, Kelsie Ann Boulton, Marie Antoinette Redoblado-Hodge, Angela Papanicolaou, Diana Barnett, Beverley Bennett, Suzi Drevensek, Jane Cramsie, Kalaichelvi Ganesalingam, Natalie Ong, Magdalen Rozsa, Rebecca Sutherland, Marcia Williamsz, Izabella Pokorski, Yun Ju Christine Song, Natalie Silove, Adam John Guastella. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (http://formative.jmir.org), 19.01.2021. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Patel, Shrujna
Boulton, Kelsie Ann
Redoblado-Hodge, Marie Antoinette
Papanicolaou, Angela
Barnett, Diana
Bennett, Beverley
Drevensek, Suzi
Cramsie, Jane
Ganesalingam, Kalaichelvi
Ong, Natalie
Rozsa, Magdalen
Sutherland, Rebecca
Williamsz, Marcia
Pokorski, Izabella
Song, Yun Ju Christine
Silove, Natalie
Guastella, Adam John
The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title_full The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title_fullStr The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title_full_unstemmed The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title_short The Acceptability and Efficacy of Electronic Data Collection in a Hospital Neurodevelopmental Clinic: Pilot Questionnaire Study
title_sort acceptability and efficacy of electronic data collection in a hospital neurodevelopmental clinic: pilot questionnaire study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33464217
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/18214
work_keys_str_mv AT patelshrujna theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT boultonkelsieann theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT redobladohodgemarieantoinette theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT papanicolaouangela theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT barnettdiana theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT bennettbeverley theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT drevenseksuzi theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT cramsiejane theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT ganesalingamkalaichelvi theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT ongnatalie theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT rozsamagdalen theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT sutherlandrebecca theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT williamszmarcia theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT pokorskiizabella theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT songyunjuchristine theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT silovenatalie theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT guastellaadamjohn theacceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT patelshrujna acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT boultonkelsieann acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT redobladohodgemarieantoinette acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT papanicolaouangela acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT barnettdiana acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT bennettbeverley acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT drevenseksuzi acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT cramsiejane acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT ganesalingamkalaichelvi acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT ongnatalie acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT rozsamagdalen acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT sutherlandrebecca acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT williamszmarcia acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT pokorskiizabella acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT songyunjuchristine acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT silovenatalie acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy
AT guastellaadamjohn acceptabilityandefficacyofelectronicdatacollectioninahospitalneurodevelopmentalclinicpilotquestionnairestudy