Cargando…
Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007 |
_version_ | 1783646076298854400 |
---|---|
author | Cortez, Daniel Erickson, Kari Hiremath, Gurumurthy Rodgers, Nathan Dugas, Brenda Braunlin, Elizabeth Ameduri, Rebecca Lohr, Jamie L. |
author_facet | Cortez, Daniel Erickson, Kari Hiremath, Gurumurthy Rodgers, Nathan Dugas, Brenda Braunlin, Elizabeth Ameduri, Rebecca Lohr, Jamie L. |
author_sort | Cortez, Daniel |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a favorable option for children without pacing indications. Unfortunately, initial pediatric studies have demonstrated a high complication rate, likely due to the 3-incision technique employed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ICD but no pacing indication were retrospectively reviewed after implantation of subcutaneous ICD via the two-incision technique. In half of the patients, 10-J impedance test was also performed to compare with impedance obtained after defibrillation threshold testing with 65-J. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included. The median age was 14 years (range 10–16 years) with eight males included (72.7%). The median weight was 55 kg (range 29 kg–75.1 kg). Follow-up had a median of 11.5 months (range 2–27 months). The median body mass index was 18.4 kg/m squared (range 15.5–27.9 kg/m squared). One patient suffered a minor complication after tearing off the incisional adhesive strips early and required a non-invasive repair in clinic. Shock impedance had a median of 55 J (range 48–68 J). There was one appropriate shock/charge and no inappropriate shocks during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The two-incision, intermuscular technique appears to have a lower acute complication rate than prior reports, in our cohort of 12 pediatric patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7854380 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78543802021-02-05 Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique Cortez, Daniel Erickson, Kari Hiremath, Gurumurthy Rodgers, Nathan Dugas, Brenda Braunlin, Elizabeth Ameduri, Rebecca Lohr, Jamie L. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a favorable option for children without pacing indications. Unfortunately, initial pediatric studies have demonstrated a high complication rate, likely due to the 3-incision technique employed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ICD but no pacing indication were retrospectively reviewed after implantation of subcutaneous ICD via the two-incision technique. In half of the patients, 10-J impedance test was also performed to compare with impedance obtained after defibrillation threshold testing with 65-J. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included. The median age was 14 years (range 10–16 years) with eight males included (72.7%). The median weight was 55 kg (range 29 kg–75.1 kg). Follow-up had a median of 11.5 months (range 2–27 months). The median body mass index was 18.4 kg/m squared (range 15.5–27.9 kg/m squared). One patient suffered a minor complication after tearing off the incisional adhesive strips early and required a non-invasive repair in clinic. Shock impedance had a median of 55 J (range 48–68 J). There was one appropriate shock/charge and no inappropriate shocks during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The two-incision, intermuscular technique appears to have a lower acute complication rate than prior reports, in our cohort of 12 pediatric patients. Elsevier 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7854380/ /pubmed/33221529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007 Text en © 2020 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cortez, Daniel Erickson, Kari Hiremath, Gurumurthy Rodgers, Nathan Dugas, Brenda Braunlin, Elizabeth Ameduri, Rebecca Lohr, Jamie L. Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title | Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title_full | Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title_fullStr | Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title_full_unstemmed | Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title_short | Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
title_sort | pediatric subq-icd implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854380/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cortezdaniel pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT ericksonkari pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT hiremathgurumurthy pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT rodgersnathan pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT dugasbrenda pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT braunlinelizabeth pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT amedurirebecca pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique AT lohrjamiel pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique |