Cargando…

Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cortez, Daniel, Erickson, Kari, Hiremath, Gurumurthy, Rodgers, Nathan, Dugas, Brenda, Braunlin, Elizabeth, Ameduri, Rebecca, Lohr, Jamie L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007
_version_ 1783646076298854400
author Cortez, Daniel
Erickson, Kari
Hiremath, Gurumurthy
Rodgers, Nathan
Dugas, Brenda
Braunlin, Elizabeth
Ameduri, Rebecca
Lohr, Jamie L.
author_facet Cortez, Daniel
Erickson, Kari
Hiremath, Gurumurthy
Rodgers, Nathan
Dugas, Brenda
Braunlin, Elizabeth
Ameduri, Rebecca
Lohr, Jamie L.
author_sort Cortez, Daniel
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a favorable option for children without pacing indications. Unfortunately, initial pediatric studies have demonstrated a high complication rate, likely due to the 3-incision technique employed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ICD but no pacing indication were retrospectively reviewed after implantation of subcutaneous ICD via the two-incision technique. In half of the patients, 10-J impedance test was also performed to compare with impedance obtained after defibrillation threshold testing with 65-J. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included. The median age was 14 years (range 10–16 years) with eight males included (72.7%). The median weight was 55 kg (range 29 kg–75.1 kg). Follow-up had a median of 11.5 months (range 2–27 months). The median body mass index was 18.4 kg/m squared (range 15.5–27.9 kg/m squared). One patient suffered a minor complication after tearing off the incisional adhesive strips early and required a non-invasive repair in clinic. Shock impedance had a median of 55 J (range 48–68 J). There was one appropriate shock/charge and no inappropriate shocks during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The two-incision, intermuscular technique appears to have a lower acute complication rate than prior reports, in our cohort of 12 pediatric patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7854380
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78543802021-02-05 Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique Cortez, Daniel Erickson, Kari Hiremath, Gurumurthy Rodgers, Nathan Dugas, Brenda Braunlin, Elizabeth Ameduri, Rebecca Lohr, Jamie L. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J Original Article INTRODUCTION: Pediatric patients with cardiomyopathies are at risk for sudden death and may need implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD’s), but given their small size and duration of use, children are at increased risk for complications associated with ICD use. The subcutaneous ICD presents a favorable option for children without pacing indications. Unfortunately, initial pediatric studies have demonstrated a high complication rate, likely due to the 3-incision technique employed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with ICD but no pacing indication were retrospectively reviewed after implantation of subcutaneous ICD via the two-incision technique. In half of the patients, 10-J impedance test was also performed to compare with impedance obtained after defibrillation threshold testing with 65-J. RESULTS: Twelve patients were included. The median age was 14 years (range 10–16 years) with eight males included (72.7%). The median weight was 55 kg (range 29 kg–75.1 kg). Follow-up had a median of 11.5 months (range 2–27 months). The median body mass index was 18.4 kg/m squared (range 15.5–27.9 kg/m squared). One patient suffered a minor complication after tearing off the incisional adhesive strips early and required a non-invasive repair in clinic. Shock impedance had a median of 55 J (range 48–68 J). There was one appropriate shock/charge and no inappropriate shocks during follow-up. CONCLUSION: The two-incision, intermuscular technique appears to have a lower acute complication rate than prior reports, in our cohort of 12 pediatric patients. Elsevier 2020-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7854380/ /pubmed/33221529 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007 Text en © 2020 Indian Heart Rhythm Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Cortez, Daniel
Erickson, Kari
Hiremath, Gurumurthy
Rodgers, Nathan
Dugas, Brenda
Braunlin, Elizabeth
Ameduri, Rebecca
Lohr, Jamie L.
Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title_full Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title_fullStr Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title_full_unstemmed Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title_short Pediatric SubQ-ICD implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
title_sort pediatric subq-icd implantation, a single center review of the inter-muscular technique
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33221529
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipej.2020.10.007
work_keys_str_mv AT cortezdaniel pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT ericksonkari pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT hiremathgurumurthy pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT rodgersnathan pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT dugasbrenda pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT braunlinelizabeth pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT amedurirebecca pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique
AT lohrjamiel pediatricsubqicdimplantationasinglecenterreviewoftheintermusculartechnique