Cargando…

Lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesion for mastectomy—an approach to reducing the seroma rate?

PURPOSE: Postoperative seromas are a problem in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesive TissuGlu(®) without drainage is equal/ non-inferior to standard mastecomy with drainage. METHODS: The study was designed as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boeer, B., Schneider, J., Schoenfisch, B., Röhm, C., Paepke, S., Oberlechner, E., Ohlinger, R., Hartkopf, A., Brucker, S. Y., Hahn, M., Marx, M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854407/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33146769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05801-1
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Postoperative seromas are a problem in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesive TissuGlu(®) without drainage is equal/ non-inferior to standard mastecomy with drainage. METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, multicentre non-inferiority study comparing the use of TissuGlu(®) without drainage with standard wound care with a drain insertion in ablative breast procedures. The number of clinical interventions, quality of life and wound complications were followed-up for 90 days in both groups. RESULTS: Although the statistical power was not reached, twice as many clinical interventions were performed in the TissuGlu(®) group than in the drainage group, especially aspirations of clinically relevant seromas (p = 0.014). The TissuGlu(®) group produced overall less wound fluid, but developed a clinically relevant seroma (100% vs. 63%) which made an intervention necessary. Less hospitalisation time was observed in the TissuGlu(®) group, but the complication rate was higher. There was no significant difference in regards to postoperative pain. In summary the non-inferiority of TissuGlu(®) compared to standard drainage couldn’t be reached. DISCUSSION: The present evaluation shows no advantage of the tissue adhesive TissuGlu(®) in terms of seroma formation and frequency of intervention compared to a standard drainage for mastectomies, but the shorter inpatient stay certainly has a positive effect on the quality of life.