Cargando…

Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management

PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 17...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baggio, Silvia, Garzon, Simone, Russo, Anna, Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino, Santi, Lorenza, Laganà, Antonio Simone, Raffaelli, Ricciarda, Franchi, Massimo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2
_version_ 1783646093835239424
author Baggio, Silvia
Garzon, Simone
Russo, Anna
Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino
Santi, Lorenza
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Raffaelli, Ricciarda
Franchi, Massimo
author_facet Baggio, Silvia
Garzon, Simone
Russo, Anna
Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino
Santi, Lorenza
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Raffaelli, Ricciarda
Franchi, Massimo
author_sort Baggio, Silvia
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 173 (49.7%) underwent surgical treatment; 38 (21.9%) were treated with methotrexate (MTX), and 49 (28.3%) had expectant management. Clinical data were retrieved by medical records, fertility outcomes were obtained by phone follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) of intrauterine clinical pregnancy (CP), miscarriage, live birth (LB), and recurrent EP, and the time between treatment and first intrauterine CP were compared between women treated with MTX, surgery and expectant management. RESULTS: The CI of intrauterine CP starting from 12 months after the EP was 65.3% for the expectant management, 55.3% for the MTX group, and 39.5% for surgery (p = 0.012). Post-hoc analysis showed expectant management having higher intrauterine CP and LB, and shorter time between treatment and first intrauterine CP compared to surgery (p < 0.05). The CI of recurrent EP was comparable between the 3 groups. The analysis stratified per βhCG cut-off of 1745 mUI/mL and EP mass cut-off of 25 mm reported consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Women successfully managed by expectation appear to have better reproductive outcomes compared to women who underwent surgery, with the shortest time to achieve a subsequent intrauterine CP. Therefore, if safely applicable the expectant management should be considered in the case of tubal EP. The fact that the chosen treatment was primarily guided by the βhCG value and EP mass diameter based on the protocol, which is intrinsically related to the characteristics of the EP, represents the main limitation of the present study. Indeed, we cannot completely exclude that the observed differences between treatments are related to the EP itself instead of the treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7854461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78544612021-02-11 Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management Baggio, Silvia Garzon, Simone Russo, Anna Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino Santi, Lorenza Laganà, Antonio Simone Raffaelli, Ricciarda Franchi, Massimo Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 173 (49.7%) underwent surgical treatment; 38 (21.9%) were treated with methotrexate (MTX), and 49 (28.3%) had expectant management. Clinical data were retrieved by medical records, fertility outcomes were obtained by phone follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) of intrauterine clinical pregnancy (CP), miscarriage, live birth (LB), and recurrent EP, and the time between treatment and first intrauterine CP were compared between women treated with MTX, surgery and expectant management. RESULTS: The CI of intrauterine CP starting from 12 months after the EP was 65.3% for the expectant management, 55.3% for the MTX group, and 39.5% for surgery (p = 0.012). Post-hoc analysis showed expectant management having higher intrauterine CP and LB, and shorter time between treatment and first intrauterine CP compared to surgery (p < 0.05). The CI of recurrent EP was comparable between the 3 groups. The analysis stratified per βhCG cut-off of 1745 mUI/mL and EP mass cut-off of 25 mm reported consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Women successfully managed by expectation appear to have better reproductive outcomes compared to women who underwent surgery, with the shortest time to achieve a subsequent intrauterine CP. Therefore, if safely applicable the expectant management should be considered in the case of tubal EP. The fact that the chosen treatment was primarily guided by the βhCG value and EP mass diameter based on the protocol, which is intrinsically related to the characteristics of the EP, represents the main limitation of the present study. Indeed, we cannot completely exclude that the observed differences between treatments are related to the EP itself instead of the treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7854461/ /pubmed/32852572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
Baggio, Silvia
Garzon, Simone
Russo, Anna
Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino
Santi, Lorenza
Laganà, Antonio Simone
Raffaelli, Ricciarda
Franchi, Massimo
Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title_full Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title_fullStr Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title_full_unstemmed Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title_short Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
title_sort fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
topic Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2
work_keys_str_mv AT baggiosilvia fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT garzonsimone fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT russoanna fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT ianniciellocesarequintino fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT santilorenza fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT laganaantoniosimone fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT raffaelliricciarda fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement
AT franchimassimo fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement