Cargando…
Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management
PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 17...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2 |
_version_ | 1783646093835239424 |
---|---|
author | Baggio, Silvia Garzon, Simone Russo, Anna Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino Santi, Lorenza Laganà, Antonio Simone Raffaelli, Ricciarda Franchi, Massimo |
author_facet | Baggio, Silvia Garzon, Simone Russo, Anna Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino Santi, Lorenza Laganà, Antonio Simone Raffaelli, Ricciarda Franchi, Massimo |
author_sort | Baggio, Silvia |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 173 (49.7%) underwent surgical treatment; 38 (21.9%) were treated with methotrexate (MTX), and 49 (28.3%) had expectant management. Clinical data were retrieved by medical records, fertility outcomes were obtained by phone follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) of intrauterine clinical pregnancy (CP), miscarriage, live birth (LB), and recurrent EP, and the time between treatment and first intrauterine CP were compared between women treated with MTX, surgery and expectant management. RESULTS: The CI of intrauterine CP starting from 12 months after the EP was 65.3% for the expectant management, 55.3% for the MTX group, and 39.5% for surgery (p = 0.012). Post-hoc analysis showed expectant management having higher intrauterine CP and LB, and shorter time between treatment and first intrauterine CP compared to surgery (p < 0.05). The CI of recurrent EP was comparable between the 3 groups. The analysis stratified per βhCG cut-off of 1745 mUI/mL and EP mass cut-off of 25 mm reported consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Women successfully managed by expectation appear to have better reproductive outcomes compared to women who underwent surgery, with the shortest time to achieve a subsequent intrauterine CP. Therefore, if safely applicable the expectant management should be considered in the case of tubal EP. The fact that the chosen treatment was primarily guided by the βhCG value and EP mass diameter based on the protocol, which is intrinsically related to the characteristics of the EP, represents the main limitation of the present study. Indeed, we cannot completely exclude that the observed differences between treatments are related to the EP itself instead of the treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7854461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78544612021-02-11 Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management Baggio, Silvia Garzon, Simone Russo, Anna Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino Santi, Lorenza Laganà, Antonio Simone Raffaelli, Ricciarda Franchi, Massimo Arch Gynecol Obstet Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine PURPOSE: To compare fertility and reproductive outcome after surgical, medical, and expectant management for tubal ectopic pregnancy (EP). METHODS: 133 of 228 patients, who were managed between January 2012 and December 2017 for a tubal EP, tried to conceive immediately after treatment: 86 out of 173 (49.7%) underwent surgical treatment; 38 (21.9%) were treated with methotrexate (MTX), and 49 (28.3%) had expectant management. Clinical data were retrieved by medical records, fertility outcomes were obtained by phone follow-up. The cumulative incidence (CI) of intrauterine clinical pregnancy (CP), miscarriage, live birth (LB), and recurrent EP, and the time between treatment and first intrauterine CP were compared between women treated with MTX, surgery and expectant management. RESULTS: The CI of intrauterine CP starting from 12 months after the EP was 65.3% for the expectant management, 55.3% for the MTX group, and 39.5% for surgery (p = 0.012). Post-hoc analysis showed expectant management having higher intrauterine CP and LB, and shorter time between treatment and first intrauterine CP compared to surgery (p < 0.05). The CI of recurrent EP was comparable between the 3 groups. The analysis stratified per βhCG cut-off of 1745 mUI/mL and EP mass cut-off of 25 mm reported consistent results. CONCLUSIONS: Women successfully managed by expectation appear to have better reproductive outcomes compared to women who underwent surgery, with the shortest time to achieve a subsequent intrauterine CP. Therefore, if safely applicable the expectant management should be considered in the case of tubal EP. The fact that the chosen treatment was primarily guided by the βhCG value and EP mass diameter based on the protocol, which is intrinsically related to the characteristics of the EP, represents the main limitation of the present study. Indeed, we cannot completely exclude that the observed differences between treatments are related to the EP itself instead of the treatment. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-27 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7854461/ /pubmed/32852572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine Baggio, Silvia Garzon, Simone Russo, Anna Ianniciello, Cesare Quintino Santi, Lorenza Laganà, Antonio Simone Raffaelli, Ricciarda Franchi, Massimo Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title | Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title_full | Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title_fullStr | Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title_full_unstemmed | Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title_short | Fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
title_sort | fertility and reproductive outcome after tubal ectopic pregnancy: comparison among methotrexate, surgery and expectant management |
topic | Gynecologic Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05749-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baggiosilvia fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT garzonsimone fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT russoanna fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT ianniciellocesarequintino fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT santilorenza fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT laganaantoniosimone fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT raffaelliricciarda fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement AT franchimassimo fertilityandreproductiveoutcomeaftertubalectopicpregnancycomparisonamongmethotrexatesurgeryandexpectantmanagement |