Cargando…
Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
Treatment of patients with malignancy sometimes be delayed due to various reasons. Several studies revealed that an influence of diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on outcomes differs depending on the type of malignancy. In this study, we evaluated the influence of DTI on clinical outcomes in new...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82615-4 |
_version_ | 1783646108651618304 |
---|---|
author | Yoshida, Masahiro Nakaya, Yosuke Shimizu, Katsujun Tatsumi, Naoko Tsutsumi, Minako Fuseya, Hoyuri Horiuchi, Mirei Yoshimura, Takuro Hayashi, Yoshiki Nakao, Takafumi Inoue, Takeshi Yamane, Takahisa |
author_facet | Yoshida, Masahiro Nakaya, Yosuke Shimizu, Katsujun Tatsumi, Naoko Tsutsumi, Minako Fuseya, Hoyuri Horiuchi, Mirei Yoshimura, Takuro Hayashi, Yoshiki Nakao, Takafumi Inoue, Takeshi Yamane, Takahisa |
author_sort | Yoshida, Masahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | Treatment of patients with malignancy sometimes be delayed due to various reasons. Several studies revealed that an influence of diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on outcomes differs depending on the type of malignancy. In this study, we evaluated the influence of DTI on clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A total of 199 patients were identified with a median DTI of 22 days. At 2 years, patients with short DTI (0–22 days) showed significantly poorer OS (62.7% vs 86.4%) and PFS (55.1% vs 75.9%) compared to those with long DTI (over 22 days). Although short DTI was strongly correlated with several known adverse factors, it remained to be an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, our study confirmed the importance of DTI in patients with DLBCL. Researchers should consider DTI as one of the important prognostic factors and plan clinical trials to be able to enroll patients with aggressive disease requiring urgent treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7854577 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78545772021-02-03 Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Yoshida, Masahiro Nakaya, Yosuke Shimizu, Katsujun Tatsumi, Naoko Tsutsumi, Minako Fuseya, Hoyuri Horiuchi, Mirei Yoshimura, Takuro Hayashi, Yoshiki Nakao, Takafumi Inoue, Takeshi Yamane, Takahisa Sci Rep Article Treatment of patients with malignancy sometimes be delayed due to various reasons. Several studies revealed that an influence of diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) on outcomes differs depending on the type of malignancy. In this study, we evaluated the influence of DTI on clinical outcomes in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A total of 199 patients were identified with a median DTI of 22 days. At 2 years, patients with short DTI (0–22 days) showed significantly poorer OS (62.7% vs 86.4%) and PFS (55.1% vs 75.9%) compared to those with long DTI (over 22 days). Although short DTI was strongly correlated with several known adverse factors, it remained to be an independent prognostic factor by multivariate analysis. In conclusion, our study confirmed the importance of DTI in patients with DLBCL. Researchers should consider DTI as one of the important prognostic factors and plan clinical trials to be able to enroll patients with aggressive disease requiring urgent treatment. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7854577/ /pubmed/33531642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82615-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yoshida, Masahiro Nakaya, Yosuke Shimizu, Katsujun Tatsumi, Naoko Tsutsumi, Minako Fuseya, Hoyuri Horiuchi, Mirei Yoshimura, Takuro Hayashi, Yoshiki Nakao, Takafumi Inoue, Takeshi Yamane, Takahisa Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title | Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title_full | Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title_fullStr | Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title_short | Importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
title_sort | importance of diagnosis-to-treatment interval in newly diagnosed patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854577/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33531642 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82615-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoshidamasahiro importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT nakayayosuke importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT shimizukatsujun importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT tatsuminaoko importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT tsutsumiminako importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT fuseyahoyuri importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT horiuchimirei importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT yoshimuratakuro importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT hayashiyoshiki importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT nakaotakafumi importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT inouetakeshi importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma AT yamanetakahisa importanceofdiagnosistotreatmentintervalinnewlydiagnosedpatientswithdiffuselargebcelllymphoma |