Cargando…

Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a handcycling high-intensity interval training program for individuals with spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN: Pilot non-randomized clinical trial OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of performing handcycling high intensity interval training (HIIT) for six weeks in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. SETTING: Participant’s home METHODS: Participa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koontz, Alicia M., Garfunkel, Cecile E., Crytzer, Theresa M., Anthony, Steven J., Nindl, Bradley C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7854955/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32908194
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-00548-7
Descripción
Sumario:STUDY DESIGN: Pilot non-randomized clinical trial OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of performing handcycling high intensity interval training (HIIT) for six weeks in wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. SETTING: Participant’s home METHODS: Participants completed pre and post graded exercise stress tests, exercise surveys and six weeks of handcycling HIIT. The HIIT program consisted of two weekly, 25 minute supervised at-home sessions (2-3 min warm-up, then 10 intervals of cycling with a ratio of 1 minute work at 90% peak power output (PPO) to 1 minute recovery at 0-20% PPO, then 2-3 min cool-down). Real-time power output and heart rate were recorded via sensors and a bike computer. The sensor data were analyzed to evaluate training efficacy. RESULTS: Seven of the 10 enrolled participants (70%) completed the study. All but one completed the required 12 sessions. The participants met at least one of the HIIT target intensity criteria in 76 out of 89 total sessions (85.4%) performed. Participants expressed a high level of enjoyment on the Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale, mean (SD) = 114.8 (11.3), and satisfaction with the overall experience. Five of the seven participants (71%) who completed the study felt an increase in endurance, function and health. Objective physiological changes showed mixed results. CONCLUSIONS: Six weeks of handcycling HIIT appears to be safe, feasible and acceptable. A longer HIIT work interval may be needed to elicit significant physiological responses. Future investigation of the feasibility and efficacy of differing HIIT parameters is needed.