Cargando…
Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis
Introduction: Despite surgical and chemotherapeutical treatment options, the prognosis for glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Some studies have found that using lomustine plus bevacizumab to treat GBM can prolong overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this study was to e...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.603947 |
_version_ | 1783646165979365376 |
---|---|
author | Ren, Xing Ai, Di Li, Tong Xia, Lei Sun, Lingzhi |
author_facet | Ren, Xing Ai, Di Li, Tong Xia, Lei Sun, Lingzhi |
author_sort | Ren, Xing |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: Despite surgical and chemotherapeutical treatment options, the prognosis for glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Some studies have found that using lomustine plus bevacizumab to treat GBM can prolong overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of the two drugs in combination treatment of GBM using a meta-analysis of the existing literature to help settle the ongoing debate. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the effectiveness of lomustine plus bevacizumab in GBM literature, updated on June 6, 2020. The main outcomes analyzed included PFS and OS; the effects of this drug combination on the 6-month PFS, which represents the percentage of patients who had PFS for 6 months, were also analyzed. All the data were pooled: OS and PFS with the mean difference (MD) and 6-month PFS with the risk ratio (RR). Because there were different control groups and dose groups, two subgroup analyses were run to ensure they were comparable. All statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager Version 5.3 software. Results: Six clinical trials were identified which included 1,095 patients (treatment group: 516; control group: 579). The group treated with lomustine and bevacizumab showed an improvement in OS (MD =1.37; 95% CI, 0.49–2.25; p = 0.002), PFS (MD = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13–0.34; p < 0.00001), and 6-month PFS (RR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.43–3.65; p = 0.0005). Two subgroup analyses of the main outcome, OS, show that the results of Control group A (p = 0.01) and Dose group 2 (p = 0.003) are significantly different from those of the other control or dose groups. Conclusion: This study shows that lomustine and bevacizumab can effectively increase OS, PFS, and 6-month PFS in patients with GBM. The encouraging results of the lomustine and bevacizumab combination therapy for GBM should be studied in more clinical trials in the future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7855027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78550272021-02-04 Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis Ren, Xing Ai, Di Li, Tong Xia, Lei Sun, Lingzhi Front Neurol Neurology Introduction: Despite surgical and chemotherapeutical treatment options, the prognosis for glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor. Some studies have found that using lomustine plus bevacizumab to treat GBM can prolong overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The aim of this study was to explore the efficacy of the two drugs in combination treatment of GBM using a meta-analysis of the existing literature to help settle the ongoing debate. Materials and Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for the effectiveness of lomustine plus bevacizumab in GBM literature, updated on June 6, 2020. The main outcomes analyzed included PFS and OS; the effects of this drug combination on the 6-month PFS, which represents the percentage of patients who had PFS for 6 months, were also analyzed. All the data were pooled: OS and PFS with the mean difference (MD) and 6-month PFS with the risk ratio (RR). Because there were different control groups and dose groups, two subgroup analyses were run to ensure they were comparable. All statistical analyses were performed using the Review Manager Version 5.3 software. Results: Six clinical trials were identified which included 1,095 patients (treatment group: 516; control group: 579). The group treated with lomustine and bevacizumab showed an improvement in OS (MD =1.37; 95% CI, 0.49–2.25; p = 0.002), PFS (MD = 0.23; 95% CI, 0.13–0.34; p < 0.00001), and 6-month PFS (RR = 2.29; 95% CI, 1.43–3.65; p = 0.0005). Two subgroup analyses of the main outcome, OS, show that the results of Control group A (p = 0.01) and Dose group 2 (p = 0.003) are significantly different from those of the other control or dose groups. Conclusion: This study shows that lomustine and bevacizumab can effectively increase OS, PFS, and 6-month PFS in patients with GBM. The encouraging results of the lomustine and bevacizumab combination therapy for GBM should be studied in more clinical trials in the future. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7855027/ /pubmed/33551965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.603947 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ren, Ai, Li, Xia and Sun. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neurology Ren, Xing Ai, Di Li, Tong Xia, Lei Sun, Lingzhi Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of Lomustine Combined With Bevacizumab in Glioblastoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of lomustine combined with bevacizumab in glioblastoma: a meta-analysis |
topic | Neurology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33551965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.603947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renxing effectivenessoflomustinecombinedwithbevacizumabinglioblastomaametaanalysis AT aidi effectivenessoflomustinecombinedwithbevacizumabinglioblastomaametaanalysis AT litong effectivenessoflomustinecombinedwithbevacizumabinglioblastomaametaanalysis AT xialei effectivenessoflomustinecombinedwithbevacizumabinglioblastomaametaanalysis AT sunlingzhi effectivenessoflomustinecombinedwithbevacizumabinglioblastomaametaanalysis |