Cargando…

Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition

BACKGROUND: The SwiftScan solution (General Electric Healthcare) combines a new low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator and a tomographic step-and-shoot continuous (SSC) mode acquisition. The purpose of this study is to determine whether SSC mode can be used in clinical practice with short...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Picone, Valentin, Makris, Nikolaos, Boutevin, Fanny, Roy, Sarah, Playe, Margot, Soussan, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00354-x
_version_ 1783646175900991488
author Picone, Valentin
Makris, Nikolaos
Boutevin, Fanny
Roy, Sarah
Playe, Margot
Soussan, Michael
author_facet Picone, Valentin
Makris, Nikolaos
Boutevin, Fanny
Roy, Sarah
Playe, Margot
Soussan, Michael
author_sort Picone, Valentin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The SwiftScan solution (General Electric Healthcare) combines a new low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator and a tomographic step-and-shoot continuous (SSC) mode acquisition. The purpose of this study is to determine whether SSC mode can be used in clinical practice with shorter examination times, while preserving image quality and ensuring accurate semi-quantification. Twenty bone scan and 10 lung scan studies were randomly selected over a period of 2 months. Three sets of image datasets were produced: step-and-shoot (SS) acquisition, simulated 25% count reduction using the Poisson resampling method (SimSS), and SimSS continuous acquisition (SimSSC), where SimSS was summed with counts acquired during detector head rotation. Visual assessment (5-point Likert scale, 2 readers) and semi-quantitative evaluation (50 focal uptake from 10 bone studies), assessed by SUV(mean), coefficient of variation (COV), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were performed using t test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intra-reader agreement was substantial for reader 1 (k = 0.71) and for reader 2 (k = 0.61). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for SS set (k = 0.93) and moderate for SimSSC (k = 0.52). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good interchangeability of SS and SimSSC SUV values. The mean CNR between SS and SimSSC was not significantly different: 42.9 ± 43.7 [23.7–62.1] vs. 43.1 ± 46 [22.9–63.3] (p = 0.46), respectively. COV values, assessing noise level, did not deviate significantly between SS and SimSSC: 0.20 ± 0.08 [0.18–0.23] vs. 0.21 ± 0.08, [0.18–0.23] (p = 0.15), respectively, whereas a significant difference was demonstrated between SS and SimSS: 0.20 ± 0.08 [0.18–0.23] vs. 0.23 ± 0.09 [0.20–0.25] (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SSC mode acquisition decreases examination time by approximately 25% in bone and lung SPECT/CT studies compared to SS mode (~ 2 min per single-bed SPECT), without compromising image quality and signal quantification. This SPECT sensitivity improvement also offers the prospect of more comfortable exams, with less motion artifacts, especially in painful or dyspneic patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7855188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78551882021-02-11 Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition Picone, Valentin Makris, Nikolaos Boutevin, Fanny Roy, Sarah Playe, Margot Soussan, Michael EJNMMI Phys Original Research BACKGROUND: The SwiftScan solution (General Electric Healthcare) combines a new low-energy high-resolution sensitivity collimator and a tomographic step-and-shoot continuous (SSC) mode acquisition. The purpose of this study is to determine whether SSC mode can be used in clinical practice with shorter examination times, while preserving image quality and ensuring accurate semi-quantification. Twenty bone scan and 10 lung scan studies were randomly selected over a period of 2 months. Three sets of image datasets were produced: step-and-shoot (SS) acquisition, simulated 25% count reduction using the Poisson resampling method (SimSS), and SimSS continuous acquisition (SimSSC), where SimSS was summed with counts acquired during detector head rotation. Visual assessment (5-point Likert scale, 2 readers) and semi-quantitative evaluation (50 focal uptake from 10 bone studies), assessed by SUV(mean), coefficient of variation (COV), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), were performed using t test and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: Intra-reader agreement was substantial for reader 1 (k = 0.71) and for reader 2 (k = 0.61). Inter-reader agreement was substantial for SS set (k = 0.93) and moderate for SimSSC (k = 0.52). Bland-Altman analysis showed a good interchangeability of SS and SimSSC SUV values. The mean CNR between SS and SimSSC was not significantly different: 42.9 ± 43.7 [23.7–62.1] vs. 43.1 ± 46 [22.9–63.3] (p = 0.46), respectively. COV values, assessing noise level, did not deviate significantly between SS and SimSSC: 0.20 ± 0.08 [0.18–0.23] vs. 0.21 ± 0.08, [0.18–0.23] (p = 0.15), respectively, whereas a significant difference was demonstrated between SS and SimSS: 0.20 ± 0.08 [0.18–0.23] vs. 0.23 ± 0.09 [0.20–0.25] (p < 0.0001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SSC mode acquisition decreases examination time by approximately 25% in bone and lung SPECT/CT studies compared to SS mode (~ 2 min per single-bed SPECT), without compromising image quality and signal quantification. This SPECT sensitivity improvement also offers the prospect of more comfortable exams, with less motion artifacts, especially in painful or dyspneic patients. Springer International Publishing 2021-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7855188/ /pubmed/33532876 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00354-x Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Picone, Valentin
Makris, Nikolaos
Boutevin, Fanny
Roy, Sarah
Playe, Margot
Soussan, Michael
Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title_full Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title_fullStr Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title_full_unstemmed Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title_short Clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during SPECT acquisition
title_sort clinical validation of time reduction strategy in continuous step-and-shoot mode during spect acquisition
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33532876
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40658-021-00354-x
work_keys_str_mv AT piconevalentin clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition
AT makrisnikolaos clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition
AT boutevinfanny clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition
AT roysarah clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition
AT playemargot clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition
AT soussanmichael clinicalvalidationoftimereductionstrategyincontinuousstepandshootmodeduringspectacquisition