Cargando…

Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study

BACKGROUND: The development and clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for the identification of parameters altering radiomics reproducibility. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of magnetic field strength on magnetic resonance imaging (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ammari, Samy, Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie, Dercle, Laurent, Chouzenoux, Emilie, Moalla, Salma, Reuze, Sylvain, Talbot, Hugues, Mokoyoko, Tite, Hadchiti, Joya, Diffetocq, Sebastien, Volk, Andreas, El Haik, Mickeal, Lakiss, Sara, Balleyguier, Corinne, Lassau, Nathalie, Bidault, Francois
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541663
_version_ 1783646199160504320
author Ammari, Samy
Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie
Dercle, Laurent
Chouzenoux, Emilie
Moalla, Salma
Reuze, Sylvain
Talbot, Hugues
Mokoyoko, Tite
Hadchiti, Joya
Diffetocq, Sebastien
Volk, Andreas
El Haik, Mickeal
Lakiss, Sara
Balleyguier, Corinne
Lassau, Nathalie
Bidault, Francois
author_facet Ammari, Samy
Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie
Dercle, Laurent
Chouzenoux, Emilie
Moalla, Salma
Reuze, Sylvain
Talbot, Hugues
Mokoyoko, Tite
Hadchiti, Joya
Diffetocq, Sebastien
Volk, Andreas
El Haik, Mickeal
Lakiss, Sara
Balleyguier, Corinne
Lassau, Nathalie
Bidault, Francois
author_sort Ammari, Samy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The development and clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for the identification of parameters altering radiomics reproducibility. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of magnetic field strength on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features in neuroradiology clinical practice. METHODS: T1 3D SPGR sequence was acquired on two phantoms and 10 healthy volunteers with two clinical MR devices from the same manufacturer using two different magnetic fields (1.5 and 3T). Phantoms varied in terms of gadolinium concentrations and textural heterogeneity. 27 regions of interest were segmented (phantom: 21, volunteers: 6) using the LIFEX software. 34 features were analyzed. RESULTS: In the phantom dataset, 10 (67%) out of 15 radiomics features were significantly different when measured at 1.5T or 3T (student’s t-test, p < 0.05). Gray levels resampling, and pixel size also influence part of texture features. These findings were validated in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: According to daily used protocols for clinical examinations, radiomic features extracted on 1.5T should not be used interchangeably with 3T when evaluating texture features. Such confounding factor should be adjusted when adapting the results of a study to a different platform, or when designing a multicentric trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7855708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78557082021-02-04 Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study Ammari, Samy Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie Dercle, Laurent Chouzenoux, Emilie Moalla, Salma Reuze, Sylvain Talbot, Hugues Mokoyoko, Tite Hadchiti, Joya Diffetocq, Sebastien Volk, Andreas El Haik, Mickeal Lakiss, Sara Balleyguier, Corinne Lassau, Nathalie Bidault, Francois Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: The development and clinical adoption of quantitative imaging biomarkers (radiomics) has established the need for the identification of parameters altering radiomics reproducibility. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of magnetic field strength on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics features in neuroradiology clinical practice. METHODS: T1 3D SPGR sequence was acquired on two phantoms and 10 healthy volunteers with two clinical MR devices from the same manufacturer using two different magnetic fields (1.5 and 3T). Phantoms varied in terms of gadolinium concentrations and textural heterogeneity. 27 regions of interest were segmented (phantom: 21, volunteers: 6) using the LIFEX software. 34 features were analyzed. RESULTS: In the phantom dataset, 10 (67%) out of 15 radiomics features were significantly different when measured at 1.5T or 3T (student’s t-test, p < 0.05). Gray levels resampling, and pixel size also influence part of texture features. These findings were validated in healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: According to daily used protocols for clinical examinations, radiomic features extracted on 1.5T should not be used interchangeably with 3T when evaluating texture features. Such confounding factor should be adjusted when adapting the results of a study to a different platform, or when designing a multicentric trial. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7855708/ /pubmed/33552944 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541663 Text en Copyright © 2021 Ammari, Pitre-Champagnat, Dercle, Chouzenoux, Moalla, Reuze, Talbot, Mokoyoko, Hadchiti, Diffetocq, Volk, El Haik, Lakiss, Balleyguier, Lassau and Bidault http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Ammari, Samy
Pitre-Champagnat, Stephanie
Dercle, Laurent
Chouzenoux, Emilie
Moalla, Salma
Reuze, Sylvain
Talbot, Hugues
Mokoyoko, Tite
Hadchiti, Joya
Diffetocq, Sebastien
Volk, Andreas
El Haik, Mickeal
Lakiss, Sara
Balleyguier, Corinne
Lassau, Nathalie
Bidault, Francois
Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title_full Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title_short Influence of Magnetic Field Strength on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics Features in Brain Imaging, an In Vitro and In Vivo Study
title_sort influence of magnetic field strength on magnetic resonance imaging radiomics features in brain imaging, an in vitro and in vivo study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7855708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33552944
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.541663
work_keys_str_mv AT ammarisamy influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT pitrechampagnatstephanie influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT derclelaurent influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT chouzenouxemilie influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT moallasalma influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT reuzesylvain influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT talbothugues influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT mokoyokotite influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT hadchitijoya influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT diffetocqsebastien influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT volkandreas influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT elhaikmickeal influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT lakisssara influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT balleyguiercorinne influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT lassaunathalie influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy
AT bidaultfrancois influenceofmagneticfieldstrengthonmagneticresonanceimagingradiomicsfeaturesinbrainimaginganinvitroandinvivostudy