Cargando…

Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator

INTRODUCTION: The hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) has the potential to test novel concepts in breast cancer patients such as daily MR-guided real-time plan adaptation. Before starting clinical trials, preparatory studies for example of the MR-dependent electron stream effect (ESE)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De-Colle, C., Nachbar, M., Mӧnnich, D., Boeke, S., Gani, C., Weidner, N., Heinrich, V., Winter, J., Tsitsekidis, S., Dohm, O., Zips, D., Thorwarth, D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.005
_version_ 1783646239324110848
author De-Colle, C.
Nachbar, M.
Mӧnnich, D.
Boeke, S.
Gani, C.
Weidner, N.
Heinrich, V.
Winter, J.
Tsitsekidis, S.
Dohm, O.
Zips, D.
Thorwarth, D.
author_facet De-Colle, C.
Nachbar, M.
Mӧnnich, D.
Boeke, S.
Gani, C.
Weidner, N.
Heinrich, V.
Winter, J.
Tsitsekidis, S.
Dohm, O.
Zips, D.
Thorwarth, D.
author_sort De-Colle, C.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) has the potential to test novel concepts in breast cancer patients such as daily MR-guided real-time plan adaptation. Before starting clinical trials, preparatory studies for example of the MR-dependent electron stream effect (ESE) are necessary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To prospectively investigate the ESE, data from 11 patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI) at the 1.5 T MRL were evaluated. A bolus was placed on the chin and in vivo dosimetry results were compared with the dose simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The same measurements were carried out for three patients treated at a conventional linac. Toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated. RESULTS: Median doses measured and simulated on top/ underneath the bolus were 1.91 / 0.62 Gy and 2.82 / 0.63 Gy, respectively. Median differences between calculations and measurements were 0.8 Gy and 0.1 Gy. At the conventional linac, median measured doses on top/ underneath the bolus were 0.98 and 1.37 Gy. No acute toxicity exceeding grade 2 was recorded. Cosmesis was good or excellent and patient reported outcome measures were mostly scored as none or mild. CONCLUSION: The dose due to the ESE is low, correctly predicted by the TPS and effectively minimized by a bolus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856390
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78563902021-02-05 Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator De-Colle, C. Nachbar, M. Mӧnnich, D. Boeke, S. Gani, C. Weidner, N. Heinrich, V. Winter, J. Tsitsekidis, S. Dohm, O. Zips, D. Thorwarth, D. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Original Research Article INTRODUCTION: The hybrid magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) has the potential to test novel concepts in breast cancer patients such as daily MR-guided real-time plan adaptation. Before starting clinical trials, preparatory studies for example of the MR-dependent electron stream effect (ESE) are necessary. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To prospectively investigate the ESE, data from 11 patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI) at the 1.5 T MRL were evaluated. A bolus was placed on the chin and in vivo dosimetry results were compared with the dose simulated by the treatment planning system (TPS). The same measurements were carried out for three patients treated at a conventional linac. Toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated. RESULTS: Median doses measured and simulated on top/ underneath the bolus were 1.91 / 0.62 Gy and 2.82 / 0.63 Gy, respectively. Median differences between calculations and measurements were 0.8 Gy and 0.1 Gy. At the conventional linac, median measured doses on top/ underneath the bolus were 0.98 and 1.37 Gy. No acute toxicity exceeding grade 2 was recorded. Cosmesis was good or excellent and patient reported outcome measures were mostly scored as none or mild. CONCLUSION: The dose due to the ESE is low, correctly predicted by the TPS and effectively minimized by a bolus. Elsevier 2021-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7856390/ /pubmed/33553697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.005 Text en © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
De-Colle, C.
Nachbar, M.
Mӧnnich, D.
Boeke, S.
Gani, C.
Weidner, N.
Heinrich, V.
Winter, J.
Tsitsekidis, S.
Dohm, O.
Zips, D.
Thorwarth, D.
Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title_full Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title_fullStr Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title_short Analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator
title_sort analysis of the electron-stream effect in patients treated with partial breast irradiation using the 1.5 t mr-linear accelerator
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856390/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33553697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ctro.2020.12.005
work_keys_str_mv AT decollec analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT nachbarm analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT mönnichd analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT boekes analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT ganic analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT weidnern analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT heinrichv analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT winterj analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT tsitsekidiss analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT dohmo analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT zipsd analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator
AT thorwarthd analysisoftheelectronstreameffectinpatientstreatedwithpartialbreastirradiationusingthe15tmrlinearaccelerator