Cargando…
Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132 |
_version_ | 1783646253897220096 |
---|---|
author | Gibson, Angela L F Carney, Bonnie C Cuttle, Leila Andrews, Christine J Kowalczewski, Christine J Liu, Aiping Powell, Heather M Stone, Randolph Supp, Dorothy M Singer, Adam J Shupp, Jeffrey W Stalter, Lily Moffatt, Lauren T |
author_facet | Gibson, Angela L F Carney, Bonnie C Cuttle, Leila Andrews, Christine J Kowalczewski, Christine J Liu, Aiping Powell, Heather M Stone, Randolph Supp, Dorothy M Singer, Adam J Shupp, Jeffrey W Stalter, Lily Moffatt, Lauren T |
author_sort | Gibson, Angela L F |
collection | PubMed |
description | Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise details reported for the experimental procedures make comparison of research between investigators challenging and ultimately affect translation to patients. They sought to compare deep partial thickness porcine burn models from five well-established laboratories. In doing so, they uncovered a lack of consistency in approaches to the evaluation of burn injury depth that was present within and among various models. They then used an iterative process to develop a scoring rubric with an educational component to facilitate burn injury depth evaluation that improved reliability of the scoring. Using the developed rubric to re-score the five burn models, they found that all models created a deep partial thickness injury and that agreement about specific characteristics identified on histological staining was improved. Finally, they present consensus statements on the evaluation and interpretation of the microanatomy of deep partial thickness burns in pigs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7856457 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-78564572021-02-05 Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? Gibson, Angela L F Carney, Bonnie C Cuttle, Leila Andrews, Christine J Kowalczewski, Christine J Liu, Aiping Powell, Heather M Stone, Randolph Supp, Dorothy M Singer, Adam J Shupp, Jeffrey W Stalter, Lily Moffatt, Lauren T J Burn Care Res Original Articles Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise details reported for the experimental procedures make comparison of research between investigators challenging and ultimately affect translation to patients. They sought to compare deep partial thickness porcine burn models from five well-established laboratories. In doing so, they uncovered a lack of consistency in approaches to the evaluation of burn injury depth that was present within and among various models. They then used an iterative process to develop a scoring rubric with an educational component to facilitate burn injury depth evaluation that improved reliability of the scoring. Using the developed rubric to re-score the five burn models, they found that all models created a deep partial thickness injury and that agreement about specific characteristics identified on histological staining was improved. Finally, they present consensus statements on the evaluation and interpretation of the microanatomy of deep partial thickness burns in pigs. Oxford University Press 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7856457/ /pubmed/32835360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Gibson, Angela L F Carney, Bonnie C Cuttle, Leila Andrews, Christine J Kowalczewski, Christine J Liu, Aiping Powell, Heather M Stone, Randolph Supp, Dorothy M Singer, Adam J Shupp, Jeffrey W Stalter, Lily Moffatt, Lauren T Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title | Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title_full | Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title_fullStr | Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title_full_unstemmed | Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title_short | Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? |
title_sort | coming to consensus: what defines deep partial thickness burn injuries in porcine models? |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856457/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gibsonangelalf comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT carneybonniec comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT cuttleleila comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT andrewschristinej comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT kowalczewskichristinej comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT liuaiping comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT powellheatherm comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT stonerandolph comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT suppdorothym comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT singeradamj comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT shuppjeffreyw comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT stalterlily comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels AT moffattlaurent comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels |