Cargando…

Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?

Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gibson, Angela L F, Carney, Bonnie C, Cuttle, Leila, Andrews, Christine J, Kowalczewski, Christine J, Liu, Aiping, Powell, Heather M, Stone, Randolph, Supp, Dorothy M, Singer, Adam J, Shupp, Jeffrey W, Stalter, Lily, Moffatt, Lauren T
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132
_version_ 1783646253897220096
author Gibson, Angela L F
Carney, Bonnie C
Cuttle, Leila
Andrews, Christine J
Kowalczewski, Christine J
Liu, Aiping
Powell, Heather M
Stone, Randolph
Supp, Dorothy M
Singer, Adam J
Shupp, Jeffrey W
Stalter, Lily
Moffatt, Lauren T
author_facet Gibson, Angela L F
Carney, Bonnie C
Cuttle, Leila
Andrews, Christine J
Kowalczewski, Christine J
Liu, Aiping
Powell, Heather M
Stone, Randolph
Supp, Dorothy M
Singer, Adam J
Shupp, Jeffrey W
Stalter, Lily
Moffatt, Lauren T
author_sort Gibson, Angela L F
collection PubMed
description Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise details reported for the experimental procedures make comparison of research between investigators challenging and ultimately affect translation to patients. They sought to compare deep partial thickness porcine burn models from five well-established laboratories. In doing so, they uncovered a lack of consistency in approaches to the evaluation of burn injury depth that was present within and among various models. They then used an iterative process to develop a scoring rubric with an educational component to facilitate burn injury depth evaluation that improved reliability of the scoring. Using the developed rubric to re-score the five burn models, they found that all models created a deep partial thickness injury and that agreement about specific characteristics identified on histological staining was improved. Finally, they present consensus statements on the evaluation and interpretation of the microanatomy of deep partial thickness burns in pigs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7856457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-78564572021-02-05 Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models? Gibson, Angela L F Carney, Bonnie C Cuttle, Leila Andrews, Christine J Kowalczewski, Christine J Liu, Aiping Powell, Heather M Stone, Randolph Supp, Dorothy M Singer, Adam J Shupp, Jeffrey W Stalter, Lily Moffatt, Lauren T J Burn Care Res Original Articles Deep partial thickness burns are clinically prevalent and difficult to diagnose. In order to develop methods to assess burn depth and therapies to treat deep partial thickness burns, reliable, accurate animal models are needed. The variety of animal models in the literature and the lack of precise details reported for the experimental procedures make comparison of research between investigators challenging and ultimately affect translation to patients. They sought to compare deep partial thickness porcine burn models from five well-established laboratories. In doing so, they uncovered a lack of consistency in approaches to the evaluation of burn injury depth that was present within and among various models. They then used an iterative process to develop a scoring rubric with an educational component to facilitate burn injury depth evaluation that improved reliability of the scoring. Using the developed rubric to re-score the five burn models, they found that all models created a deep partial thickness injury and that agreement about specific characteristics identified on histological staining was improved. Finally, they present consensus statements on the evaluation and interpretation of the microanatomy of deep partial thickness burns in pigs. Oxford University Press 2020-08-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7856457/ /pubmed/32835360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Burn Association. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Articles
Gibson, Angela L F
Carney, Bonnie C
Cuttle, Leila
Andrews, Christine J
Kowalczewski, Christine J
Liu, Aiping
Powell, Heather M
Stone, Randolph
Supp, Dorothy M
Singer, Adam J
Shupp, Jeffrey W
Stalter, Lily
Moffatt, Lauren T
Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title_full Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title_fullStr Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title_full_unstemmed Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title_short Coming to Consensus: What Defines Deep Partial Thickness Burn Injuries in Porcine Models?
title_sort coming to consensus: what defines deep partial thickness burn injuries in porcine models?
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7856457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32835360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraa132
work_keys_str_mv AT gibsonangelalf comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT carneybonniec comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT cuttleleila comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT andrewschristinej comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT kowalczewskichristinej comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT liuaiping comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT powellheatherm comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT stonerandolph comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT suppdorothym comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT singeradamj comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT shuppjeffreyw comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT stalterlily comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels
AT moffattlaurent comingtoconsensuswhatdefinesdeeppartialthicknessburninjuriesinporcinemodels